GOP ready to help end bump stock legality

That would be sensible. I'll believe it when I see it.

What is it you think you're going to see? Paddock is conveniently dead.

Are you admitting that you rejoiced when you saw the bloody corpses of so many likely Trump supporters sprawled lifeless on the ground?
 
I say every after market modifier that increases the deadly aspects of a gun should be illegal

Liberal Michael Moore wants to repeal and replace the Second Amendment to the Constitution of the United States of America, skank.

Do you agree, skank?

Answer, skank.
 
Many don't based on articles I've seen where they say bump stocks CONVERT semi to auto.

Effectively they do...

400 rounds per minute can not be construed as "semi automatic gunfire" by anyone.
While sacrificing accuracy for rounds per minute, hopolomaniacs are not interested in accuracy when they crave "full auto" ability.
 
a bump stock is not a gun idiot
Neither is a so called 'silencer' idiot.....Are they legal ?

FACT....

The NRA said, "The Obama administration approved the sale of bump fire stocks on at least two occasions."
We indeed found two occasions in which ATF, a bureau within the executive branch, decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
These decisions allowed two companies to sell bump stocks. It’s important to note this was not a statement of Obama’s preferred policy, which called for more regulation of guns, but was what the agency determined it had to do under the language of current law.
We rate this statement Mostly True.


Its not 'mostly true'....its ABSOLUTELY TRUE.........
 
Neither is a so called 'silencer' idiot.....Are they legal ?

FACT....

The NRA said, "The Obama administration approved the sale of bump fire stocks on at least two occasions."
We indeed found two occasions in which ATF, a bureau within the executive branch, decided it could not regulate bump stocks during the Obama administration.
These decisions allowed two companies to sell bump stocks. It’s important to note this was not a statement of Obama’s preferred policy, which called for more regulation of guns, but was what the agency determined it had to do under the language of current law.
We rate this statement Mostly True.


Its not 'mostly true'....its ABSOLUTELY TRUE.........

Wrong, stupid fuck. They didn't "approve the sale", stupid fuck. They deemed the part did not meet the standards of the law to be banned, stupid fuck. That's EXACTLY what the text you just provided said, stupid fuck.

Illiterate, too, stupid fuck.
 
Wrong, stupid fuck. They didn't "approve the sale", stupid fuck. They deemed the part did not meet the standards of the law to be banned, stupid fuck. That's EXACTLY what the text you just provided said, stupid fuck.

Illiterate, too, stupid fuck.
Allowing them to be sold. In other words, approving them for sale. ..._ _ _..._ _ _...
 
Allowing them to be sold. In other words, approving them for sale. ..._ _ _..._ _ _...

Finding that the EXISTING law didn't exclude them, stupid fuck.

When the chance arose to amend that law, stupid fuck, who blocked it, stupid fuck?
 
Finding that the EXISTING law didn't exclude them, stupid fuck.

When the chance arose to amend that law, stupid fuck, who blocked it, stupid fuck?

Now, now, now Domer. No need to swear and cry because you are absolutely wrong.....again.
 
Back
Top