Trump Orders Airstrikes Near Sirte, Libya

Obama allowed IS to have free rein over vast swathes of Syria and Iraq, so any civilian casualties incurred whilst taking back the likes of Raqqa and Mosul should be attributed to him.

LMFAO.

You are actually blaming Obama for activities which Trump ordered.
 
You think you are smart, and you defend the semi-literate Bomb Boosting Budhist, why do you ignore his lies, his misinformation, and how often he is simply incorrect?

[h=1]Nearly 90 Percent Of People Killed In Recent Drone Strikes Were Not The Target[/h][h=2]U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.[/h]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civilian-deaths-drone-strikes_us_561fafe2e4b028dd7ea6c4ff

[h=1]41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground[/h]


New analysis of data conducted by human rights group Reprieve shared with the Guardian, raises questions about accuracy of intelligence guiding ‘precise’ strikes

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147


Now, Tom, will you admit you were wrong, like a man, or are you going to double down, like a Trump anus licking pussy?



Have you seen the dates on those articles? Those strikes happened under Obama ffs. I don't believe those figures anyway, especially if they are in the Guardian or HuffPo.
 
LMFAO.

You are actually blaming Obama for activities which Trump ordered.
The battle for Mosul started in October last year, so who was president dummy? Anyway having to take back territory that shouldn't have been lost in the first place is clearly the fault of Obama.
 
You think you are smart, and you defend the semi-literate Bomb Boosting Budhist, why do you ignore his lies, his misinformation, and how often he is simply incorrect?

[h=1]Nearly 90 Percent Of People Killed In Recent Drone Strikes Were Not The Target[/h][h=2]U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.[/h]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civilian-deaths-drone-strikes_us_561fafe2e4b028dd7ea6c4ff

[h=1]41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground[/h]


New analysis of data conducted by human rights group Reprieve shared with the Guardian, raises questions about accuracy of intelligence guiding ‘precise’ strikes

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147


Now, Tom, will you admit you were wrong, like a man, or are you going to double down, like a Trump anus licking pussy?



Save your Norseshit for another, Runatic.
 
The battle for Mosul started in October last year, so who was president dummy? Anyway having to take back territory that shouldn't have been lost in the first place is clearly the fault of Obama.
You guys have no part in it, as I remember, the invasion was done by a coalition, seems that your government is to blame
as well, afterall Blair was right there with Bush banging the war drum. You should have stayed as well. You guys left before we did.
 
You think you are smart, and you defend the semi-literate Bomb Boosting Budhist, why do you ignore his lies, his misinformation, and how often he is simply incorrect?

[h=1]Nearly 90 Percent Of People Killed In Recent Drone Strikes Were Not The Target[/h][h=2]U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia.[/h]
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civilian-deaths-drone-strikes_us_561fafe2e4b028dd7ea6c4ff

[h=1]41 men targeted but 1,147 people killed: US drone strikes – the facts on the ground[/h]


New analysis of data conducted by human rights group Reprieve shared with the Guardian, raises questions about accuracy of intelligence guiding ‘precise’ strikes

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/nov/24/-sp-us-drone-strikes-kill-1147


Now, Tom, will you admit you were wrong, like a man, or are you going to double down, like a Trump anus licking pussy?

did you READ it? *no*. THIS ALL HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA.

Q. How do you stop it?
A. do not use "signature strikes" -where the target isn't known/verified only it's behavior "terrorist activities"
That solves the problem.. the worse was when we droned a wedding in Yemen, thinking it looked like a convoy of 'terrorists'

Drones and Airstrikes are not going to stop -nor should they.
But the hit or miss targeting has to stop - Brennan of the CIA started this crap managing Obama's secret "kill list"-
-more Deep State shenanigans

Why don't you agitate for an end to signature strikes and do something worthwhile,rather then worthless bitching?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civilian-deaths-drone-strikes_us_561fafe2e4b028dd7ea6c4ff
According to a new report from The Intercept, nearly 90 percent of people killed in recent drone strikes in Afghanistan “were not the intended targets” of the attacks.

Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.

The report, compiled from classified documents released by a source in the intelligence community, corroborates the many news accounts of civilian deaths caused by drone strikes. U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia since 2009.
 
You guys have no part in it, as I remember, the invasion was done by a coalition, seems that your government is to blame
as well, afterall Blair was right there with Bush banging the war drum. You should have stayed as well. You guys left before we did.
It will be a cold day in hell before I'd defend Tony B Liar. The British Army was in Basra in case you didn't know and that mission ended successfully. IS never went anywhere southern Iraq anyway, there was a little town called Baghdad in the way! They were only interested in recreating the Levant and reversing Sykes-Picot. Sorry but that fiasco was wholly down to your man Obama and history will judge him harshly. If you want to rewrite history then Crypiss is your boy, he even has the Russian blood so it's second nature for him.
 
This is where you claim there were no civilian deaths

thought the reality is

Report: U.S. Air Strikes Killing Far More Civilians Under Trump


The number of civilians killed by U.S. air strikes in Syria and Iraq has skyrocketed over the last several months, the latest sign of a possible military-strategy shift under President Trump.
The Daily Beast, partnering with the watchdog organization Airwars, found that the total number of dead since Trump took office is roughly equivalent to all civilian casualties during President Obama’s entire tenure.
Airwars researchers estimate that at least 2,300 civilians likely died from Coalition strikes overseen by the Obama White House—roughly 80 each month in Iraq and Syria. As of July 13, more than 2,200 additional civilians appear to have been killed by Coalition raids since Trump was inaugurated—upwards of 360 per month, or 12 or more civilians killed for every single day of his administration.”

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...e-killing-far-more-civilians-under-trump.html


Looks like
A. You are incredibly ignorant, especially for one who styles herself and "expert"
B. You are a serial liar with no regard for the truth.
gawd almighty..look at an article before you comment on it..m'k?

Here's what you are bitching about..

As of July 13, more than 2,200 additional civilians appear to have been killed by Coalition raids since Trump was inaugurated—upwards of 360 per month, or 12 or more civilians killed for every single day of his administration.”
do you know what a "coalition raid "is? apparently not.

It's anyone from Kurds to Shiite militias to Iraqi troops as well as any US activities.
It does NOT COMPARE drone strikes to drone strikes but to "casualties" killed by sectarian militia (et all) to US strikes

It's not even apples to oranges
 
It will be a cold day in hell before I'd defend Tony B Liar. The British Army was in Basra in case you didn't know and that mission ended successfully. IS never went anywhere southern Iraq anyway, there was a little town called Baghdad in the way! They were only interested in recreating the Levant and reversing Sykes-Picot. Sorry but that fiasco was wholly down to your man Obama and history will judge him harshly. If you want to rewrite history then Crypiss is your boy, he even has the Russian blood so it's second nature for him.
It was stupifying to watch ISIS advance and seize weapons without being challenged by ANY US air power.
Obama's "JV " dismissal let ISIS lose on Iraq.
 
gawd almighty..look at an article before you comment on it..m'k?

Here's what you are bitching about..

do you know what a "coalition raid "is? apparently not.

It's anyone from Kurds to Shiite militias to Iraqi troops as well as any US activities.
It does NOT COMPARE drone strikes to drone strikes but to "casualties" killed by sectarian militia (et all) to US strikes

It's not even apples to oranges
Bullshit!
The only point is that deaths have dramatically increased under Trump.
 
did you READ it? *no*. THIS ALL HAPPENED UNDER OBAMA.

Q. How do you stop it?
A. do not use "signature strikes" -where the target isn't known/verified only it's behavior "terrorist activities"
That solves the problem.. the worse was when we droned a wedding in Yemen, thinking it looked like a convoy of 'terrorists'

Drones and Airstrikes are not going to stop -nor should they.
But the hit or miss targeting has to stop - Brennan of the CIA started this crap managing Obama's secret "kill list"-
-more Deep State shenanigans

Why don't you agitate for an end to signature strikes and do something worthwhile,rather then worthless bitching?

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/civilian-deaths-drone-strikes_us_561fafe2e4b028dd7ea6c4ff
According to a new report from The Intercept, nearly 90 percent of people killed in recent drone strikes in Afghanistan “were not the intended targets” of the attacks.

Documents detailing a special operations campaign in northeastern Afghanistan, Operation Haymaker, show that between January 2012 and February 2013, U.S. special operations airstrikes killed more than 200 people. Of those, only 35 were the intended targets. During one five-month period of the operation, according to the documents, nearly 90 percent of the people killed in airstrikes were not the intended targets. In Yemen and Somalia, where the U.S. has far more limited intelligence capabilities to confirm the people killed are the intended targets, the equivalent ratios may well be much worse.

The report, compiled from classified documents released by a source in the intelligence community, corroborates the many news accounts of civilian deaths caused by drone strikes. U.S. drone strikes have killed scores of civilians in Afghanistan, Pakistan, Yemen and Somalia since 2009.
ASSHOLE!My only point is that 9 innocents die for every terrorist killed, and it seems to be getting worse under Trump.

You blind asshole, I didn't support Obama droning, I didn't support Bush droning.

You act like it is OK because "obama did it".
 
It was stupifying to watch ISIS advance and seize weapons without being challenged by ANY US air power.
Obama's "JV " dismissal let ISIS lose on Iraq.

They all know that is true but seek to deny it publically. It is all about hubris and refusing to back down.
 
Last edited:
It will be a cold day in hell before I'd defend Tony B Liar. The British Army was in Basra in case you didn't know and that mission ended successfully. IS never went anywhere southern Iraq anyway, there was a little town called Baghdad in the way! They were only interested in recreating the Levant and reversing Sykes-Picot. Sorry but that fiasco was wholly down to your man Obama and history will judge him harshly. If you want to rewrite history then Crypiss is your boy, he even has the Russian blood so it's second nature for him.
I might also add that there are British, including the SAS, fighting in Raqqa alongside Kurds and US forces.
 
Bullshit!
The only point is that deaths have dramatically increased under Trump.
the expression "dumber then a fence post " is too good for you. you must strive for stupidity.

So an Iraqi militiaman shoots a civilian in Mosul..tell me how Trump figures in this??
he DOESNT -yet you want to count that death as "before and after Trump"... towards what end?
you are incredibly idiotic
 
ASSHOLE!My only point is that 9 innocents die for every terrorist killed, and it seems to be getting worse under Trump.

You blind asshole, I didn't support Obama droning, I didn't support Bush droning.

You act like it is OK because "obama did it".
you moron.
Signature strikes are literally a "shot in the dark"- it's why all the collateral damage.

My only point is that 9 innocents die for every terrorist killed, and it seems to be getting worse under Trump.
no that's not what it says..nor does Trump have anything to do with house to house fighting by Iraqis
except for being part of a coalition to rid ISIS from the region
 
Back
Top