If Kim thinks...
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
That's because Trump is the master at giving his enemies nicknames that stick: Crooked Hillary, Lying Ted, Little Marco. "Rocket Man" was sheer brilliance.
He is the master at schoolyard bullying.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Yup. And he's protecting your sorry ass.
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
Do you REALLY think Trump is "bullying" the rocket boy? Do you remember seeing this?
The scrawny little moron is picking on the fat kid, he represents rocket boy.
The fat kid represents Trump(just thought you'd get a chuckle out of that, you're welcome). On top of all the school work he has to do, everyone hates him.
So, the scrawny little moron is getting some licks in, probably thinking he's gonna be a heavyweight boxer if he keeps eating his Vegemite, and he doesn't seem to notice the fat kid is getting tired of this shit.
Long story short, after exhibiting patience of a saint, the fat kid finally cleans the scrawny little moron's clock in spectacular fashion. The fat kid is not "bullying" the scrawny little moron by winning a fight he didn't start, is he?
Think about it. I don't want to use stick figures Jarod.
How exactly is engaging in name calling protecting me?
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
By controlling a mad man.
Name calling is controlling him? How?
All the experts say its exactly what Kim wants, acknowledgement from the leaders of the West, it helps legitimize his struggle for legitimacy at home.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
If Trump had any balls whatsoever, he'd have called Kim Rocket BOY instead of man.
Imagine how infuriating that would be for a young, pudgy faced little punk like him.
Rocket Man is not even derogatory.
Nomad
Every trumper is a N4T.
MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
All the experts say that Kim wants to be made fun of?
floridafan
Verified User
Its a shame that GWB never did a thing to stop NK from testing their first nuclear device 12 yawns ago. Because of him we are now in the current situation.
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
Why did it piss him off then?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
THANK DEMOCRATS
North Korea has reached final stage of its crash course to develop thermonuclear weapons that can reach and destroy U.S. cities. So why are we not on a crash course to protect our cities from North Korean nuclear missiles?
Answer: Because for more than three decades, DEMOCRATS have done everything in their power to prevent, obstruct or delay the deployment of ballistic missile defense.
Opposition to missile defense has been an article of faith for DEMOCRATS since President Ronald Reagan announced the Strategic Defense Initiative in 1983.
DEMOCRAT Sen. Edward M.Kennedy led the early opposition to what DEMOCRATS derisively labeled “Star Wars,” denouncing missile defense as a “mirage” and “a certain prescription for an arms race in outer space.”
Running against Reagan in 1984, DEMOCRAT Walter Mondale called it a “dangerously destabilizing” and unworkable “hoax.”
Reagan nonetheless moved forward with research and development, and his successor, George H. W. Bush, put missile defense on track for deployment with the Global Protection Against Limited Strikes (GPALS) program.
But as soon as DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton took office in 1993, he terminated GPALS and cut national missile defense funding by 80 percent, while downgrading it from an acquisition program to a technology demonstration program.
DEMOCRAT Clinton also signed an agreement to revive the moribund Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which banned deployment of missile defense and whose status had come into question with the 1991 collapse of our treaty partner, the Soviet Union.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-democrats-left-us-vulnerable-to-north-koreas-nukes/2017/09/06/534e7cc2-9302-11e7-89fa-bb822a46da5b_story.html?utm_term=.7e08890fa4d2
it did?
Русский агент
Путин - мl
When Republicans took over Congress, and passed a defense authorization bill in 1996 that required deployment, DEMOCRAT Clinton vetoed it on the grounds that there was no threat.
DEMOCRAT Secretary of Defense William Perry declared “we do not need a national missile defense system because no rogue nation has intercontinental ballistic missiles, and if these powers should ever pose a threat, our ability to retaliate with an overwhelming nuclear response will serve as a deterrent.”
In other words, national missile defense would never be needed — even to protect against North Korea, according to DEMOCRATS.
When President George W. Bush came to office, he revitalized missile defense efforts and withdrew from the ABM Treaty.
DEMOCRATS were more upset than the Russians.
DEMOCRAT Sen. Joseph Biden declared “The thing we remain the least vulnerable to is an ICBM attack from another nation” adding “This premise that one day Kim will wake up one morning and say, ‘Aha, San Francisco’ is specious.”
DEMOCRAT Secretary of Defense William Perry declared “we do not need a national missile defense system because no rogue nation has intercontinental ballistic missiles, and if these powers should ever pose a threat, our ability to retaliate with an overwhelming nuclear response will serve as a deterrent.”
In other words, national missile defense would never be needed — even to protect against North Korea, according to DEMOCRATS.
When President George W. Bush came to office, he revitalized missile defense efforts and withdrew from the ABM Treaty.
DEMOCRATS were more upset than the Russians.
DEMOCRAT Sen. Joseph Biden declared “The thing we remain the least vulnerable to is an ICBM attack from another nation” adding “This premise that one day Kim will wake up one morning and say, ‘Aha, San Francisco’ is specious.”