Breaking News.....the Russians COULD NOT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ELECTION

TheDonald said:
The Liberal NY Times says that there was a Uranium deal between Hillary and Russia

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.





Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton
Click to expand...

You're a delusional, uninformed clod.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-russian-uranium-deal/?utm_term=.97bcd5169fc5
 
TheDonald said:
https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

Yawning
Click to expand...

lol

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the deal. In 2013, Russia assumed 100 percent ownership.


The deal gave Russia control of about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity, according to a 2010 CNN article about the deal. In other words, Russia has rights to the uranium extracted at those sites, which represents 20 percent of the U.S. uranium production capacity.

Clinton’s role

"The State Department was one of nine agencies comprising CFIUS, which vets potential national security impacts of transactions where a foreign government gains control of a U.S. company. It was established by Congress in 2007 after the controversy over the planned purchase of seaports by a company in United Arab Emirates. The other agencies were the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security, and two White House agencies (Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Office of Science and Technology Policy)."

As for Giustra:


"As PolitiFact found, the majority of these donations were made before and during Clinton’s 2008 presidential run."

Flail away, punk. You keep trying to make something out of nothing in almost every topic, but so far you are O4.
 
domer76 said:
lol

The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved the deal. In 2013, Russia assumed 100 percent ownership.


The deal gave Russia control of about 20 percent of U.S. uranium extraction capacity, according to a 2010 CNN article about the deal. In other words, Russia has rights to the uranium extracted at those sites, which represents 20 percent of the U.S. uranium production capacity.

Clinton’s role

"The State Department was one of nine agencies comprising CFIUS, which vets potential national security impacts of transactions where a foreign government gains control of a U.S. company. It was established by Congress in 2007 after the controversy over the planned purchase of seaports by a company in United Arab Emirates. The other agencies were the departments of Treasury, Defense, Justice, Commerce, Energy and Homeland Security, and two White House agencies (Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and Office of Science and Technology Policy)."

As for Giustra:


"As PolitiFact found, the majority of these donations were made before and during Clinton’s 2008 presidential run."

Flail away, punk. You keep trying to make something out of nothing in almost every topic, but so far you are O4.
Click to expand...

Write the NYT and complain.................

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

Yawning again
 
TheDonald said:
Write the NYT and complain.................

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

Yawning again
Click to expand...

lol

Uninformed, delusional clod. "In 2007, Giustra sold UrAsia to Uranium One, which was based in South Africa and chaired by his friend, Ian Telfer. Giustra said he sold his personal stake in the deal in fall 2007, shortly after the merger with Uranium One, in the midst of Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and before Clinton realized Barack Obama would win the nomination and she would become his secretary of state."

Let's review:

Giustra sold his portion in 2007
Giustra made the majority of his donations in 2007, prior to Clinton becoming SOS
Nine agencies had to sign off on the deal
The signoffs did not rise to the level of SOS
Russia cannot export any of the uranium

Dismissed clod.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Uninformed, delusional clod. "In 2007, Giustra sold UrAsia to Uranium One, which was based in South Africa and chaired by his friend, Ian Telfer. Giustra said he sold his personal stake in the deal in fall 2007, shortly after the merger with Uranium One, in the midst of Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and before Clinton realized Barack Obama would win the nomination and she would become his secretary of state."

Let's review:

Giustra sold his portion in 2007
Giustra made the majority of his donations in 2007, prior to Clinton becoming SOS
Nine agencies had to sign off on the deal
The signoffs did not rise to the level of SOS
Russia cannot export any of the uranium

Dismissed clod.
Click to expand...

Look dude, if your version of reality is correct, then you have the right to demand a retraction from the New York Times..................

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

Yawning
 
floridafan said:
There was no Hillary uranium scandal and never was, just another figment of right wing imagination.
Click to expand...

Right....the NY TIMES and NY POST are simply lying. And I enjoyed the hell out of the way YOU DOCUMENTED your words of truth. Laugh My Proverbial Ass Off. You demand links then say they are lying but you just don't have the evidence to prove they are lying today? Is that right SOCK?
 
Ralph said:
Right....the NY TIMES and NY POST are simply lying. And I enjoyed the hell out of the way YOU DOCUMENTED your words of truth. Laugh My Proverbial Ass Off. You demand links then say they are lying but you just don't have the evidence to prove they are lying today? Is that right SOCK?
Click to expand...

People who demand links are retarded, now that you know that please do not pick on them as this is not politically correct.

Note this link that clearly proves something.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-st...-25/hunt-for-bigfoot-in-crawford-county-is-on

http://www.mufon.com/
 
TheDonald said:
Look Son, you are not calling me out on anything, you are in disagreement with the NYT, so feel free to demand a retraction from them.

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

Yawning
Click to expand...

Whose post is this, prepuce?

"Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election...."

Yep, that's yours. And I demonstrated that it is complete, delusional bullshittery. Go ahead now, continue to show your ignorance.
 
domer76 said:
Whose post is this, prepuce?

"Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election...."

Yep, that's yours. And I demonstrated that it is complete, delusional bullshittery. Go ahead now, continue to show your ignorance.
Click to expand...

The only way for the Russians to have influenced the election is by having electors change their votes................This can and did not happen

How many times have you ejaculated into your hand today?
 
TheDonald said:
The only way for the Russians to have influenced the election is by having electors change their votes................This can and did not happen

How many times have you ejaculated into your hand today?
Click to expand...

lol

Go ahead and continue to demonstrate what a fool you are. How are electors chosen? I'll give you a recap:

Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Trump won those states by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively — and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes. Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes.

See how that works, fool? A 0.2% margin provides 100% of the electoral vote. Now, tell us again how it is IMPOSSIBLE for influence on that 0.2% popular vote.
 
domer76 said:
lol

Go ahead and continue to demonstrate what a fool you are. How are electors chosen? I'll give you a recap:

Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Trump won those states by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively — and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes. Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes.

See how that works, fool? A 0.2% margin provides 100% of the electoral vote. Now, tell us again how it is IMPOSSIBLE for influence on that 0.2% popular vote.
Click to expand...

Wrong kid, the electors are not bound by the popular vote, this is the entire purpose of the electoral college

Go back to the porn site
 
TheDonald said:
Wrong kid, the electors are not bound by the popular vote, this is the entire purpose of the electoral college

Go back to the porn site
Click to expand...

Now you've stepped from the delusional and uninformed to the absurd.

Tell us how many electors change their votes. Then address the "impossible" notion again. I'll wait.
 
domer76 said:
Now you've stepped from the delusional and uninformed to the absurd.

Tell us how many electors change their votes. Then address the "impossible" notion again. I'll wait.
Click to expand...

You do not understand why the electoral college exist. But then what do you understand. The fact is that any elector can vote for whomever he or she chooses, they are not bound by the popular vote, as say Madonna could run and get more votes than Trump and Madonna could actually say that I will not be president and that you are all crackheads. No law prevents this, nor is there any law to stop people voting for turds wearing colostomy bags
 
DUMBER & IQ76 said:
lol

Go ahead and continue to demonstrate what a fool you are. How are electors chosen? I'll give you a recap:

Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Trump won those states by 0.2, 0.7 and 0.8 percentage points, respectively — and by 10,704, 46,765 and 22,177 votes. Those three wins gave him 46 electoral votes.

See how that works, fool? A 0.2% margin provides 100% of the electoral vote. Now, tell us again how it is IMPOSSIBLE for influence on that 0.2% popular vote.
Click to expand...

You really are an idiot on steroids; but alas, too stupid to comprehend how moronic you look.
 
TheDonald said:
You do not understand why the electoral college exist. But then what do you understand. The fact is that any elector can vote for whomever he or she chooses, they are not bound by the popular vote, as say Madonna could run and get more votes than Trump and Madonna could actually say that I will not be president and that you are all crackheads. No law prevents this, nor is there any law to stop people voting for turds wearing colostomy bags
Click to expand...

The fact, dumbfuck, is that they DON'T change their votes in any significant number. So, the ignorance of your ridiculous OP still stands.

Fucking cretinous lemmingtard.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top