Breaking News.....the Russians COULD NOT HAVE INFLUENCED THE ELECTION

"explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office" Its called buying influence honey pot, just like what you accused Mrs Clinton of with donations to her charity. As usual you are completely FOS. NOW, document the $100 million you accused Obama of accepting. You know you can't because it never happened.

I accused Crooked Hillary of nothing, durian dumpling, and I didn't say "the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office".
 
You don't think that donating a $100 million to the presidents daughter is not buying influence. Is there anything, absolutely anything that you won't do to defend trump?
 
Yup it's true, it is impossible for the Russians to have influenced the last election because of the electoral college. Simple really, see you did not vote, or your votes meant nothing because Trump was elected by the electoral college, not the people. Why? this was designed to prohibit tampering and it worked wonderfully.

Thanks George...................

Next

Wrong again, idiot. Only 77,000 had to be influenced.

10,000 in Michigan
22,000 in Wisconsin
46,000 in Pennsylvania

That was the difference. All 0.8% margin or less.

How one can be so easily mislead and chronically wrong is astounding.
 
I am still waiting for your proof for your link, honey bunch. So far all we have is a whole lot of bullshyte and a woman who doesn't know what fascism is.

Ralph is a rambling, senilic moron. What's the new word? Dotard.

You'll get bogged down in his non-sensical drivel if you allow it.
 
Wrong again, idiot. Only 77,000 had to be influenced.

10,000 in Michigan
22,000 in Wisconsin
46,000 in Pennsylvania

That was the difference. All 0.8% margin or less.

How one can be so easily mislead and chronically wrong is astounding.

So you are saying that the Russians put a gun to 77,000 Americans heads.....................LOL

Take your pills
 
fe6dueqgwgnz.png
 
I didn't say that at all, you illiterate fuck. I said the premise of your post is bullshit.

Votes = electoral college.

So now you are claiming that the Russians influenced 77,000 members of the electoral college.............

Whew, you need shots pronto

Try heroin in the eyeballs
 
So now you are claiming that the Russians influenced 77,000 members of the electoral college.............

Whew, you need shots pronto

Try heroin in the eyeballs[/QUOTE

Congrats on moving to the number one spot on the Illiterate List, dumbfuck.

Go back to grade school and bitch slap the teacher that failed to teach you reading comprehension.
 
So now you are claiming that the Russians influenced 77,000 members of the electoral college.............

Whew, you need shots pronto

Try heroin in the eyeballs[/QUOTE

Congrats on moving to the number one spot on the Illiterate List, dumbfuck.

Go back to grade school and bitch slap the teacher that failed to teach you reading comprehension.

Just tell us how the Russians twisted the Arms of the electoral college?
 
Just tell us how the Russians twisted the Arms of the electoral college?

You really are an illiterate fuck. Try this:

Read your initial post. It's bullshit.

One state, with its concomitant ELECTORAL COLLEGE votes, was decided by 0.2% of the popular vote. Did I say the Russians did that? Nope. I sure didn't, even though a dimwit like you thinks I did. But when you state that it's IMPOSSIBLE to influence an election because of the electoral college, you are demonstrating your massive ignorance.
 
"explain how the Saudis are helping Donald Trump get elected by helping his family promote capitalism 5 months after Trump took office"

Its called buying influence honey pot, just like what you accused Mrs Clinton of with donations to her charity. As usual you are completely FOS. NOW, document the $100 million you accused Obama of accepting. You know you can't because it never happened.

Sock: If I were going to purchase a candidate....I would purchase him Before the Election not 5 months after the fact. As I said, you clearly are a bigot and a anti-feminist as the Saudis funded a trust to help females become business owners. If any of that money is funneled into Politics as you are suggesting, its a direct violation of US Law (campaign finances) and Trump would be in jail as we speak. What are you also suggesting that the DOJ who is in the process of building a FAKE RUSSIAN TRUMP collusion would not have jumped on this ALREADY? They would have been "drooling" at such a blatant act....unlike The Clintons who actually did solicit money from foreign nation for personal gain and campaign reasons...and it documented.

Now where's YOUR evidence that the Saudis have colluded with Donald Trump...as he has severed all ties to his business while in office.....to purchase favors. Proceed DOCUMENT your evidence in an objective and testable fashion in something other than your MOUTH (typical demwit).

www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/h...foundation-scandal-defended-article-1.2765590

Or....the Hillary Russian Uranium scandal that you refuse to acknowledge

www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us/cash-...s-pressed-for-control-of-uranium-company.html

And the Obama's use of the internet to solicit campaign funds (the same thing you are bitching about others accessing a mere 100K) is also easily documented. Where have you been with your head up your ass? The numbers were wrong...as he chalked up some 600 million thanks to his use of the net. And the sad fact? No one will ever know just where these internet funds came from as there is no way of tracking the small donations....as the contributions were not made through a traceable Social Media outlet. All one would have to do is set up a phony accounts that would revolve new names (socks, something you should be very familiar with) with every donation.
https://www.wired.com/2008/11/propelled-by-in/

I know, I know....you would attempt to attack messenger if the sources had not been the New Daily News and the New York Times. Can't blame it on fake internet news....the left wing catch all when in reality its the main stream media that has been caught time and time again presenting supposed news from a famous character.

Mr. and/or Mrs. "Anonymous"
 
Last edited:
You really are an illiterate fuck. Try this:

Read your initial post. It's bullshit.

One state, with its concomitant ELECTORAL COLLEGE votes, was decided by 0.2% of the popular vote. Did I say the Russians did that? Nope. I sure didn't, even though a dimwit like you thinks I did. But when you state that it's IMPOSSIBLE to influence an election because of the electoral college, you are demonstrating your massive ignorance.

The Electoral College was created for two reasons. The first purpose was to create a buffer between population and the selection of a President. The second as part of the structure of the government that gave extra power to the smaller states.

The first reason that the founders created the Electoral College is hard to understand today. The founding fathers were afraid of direct election to the Presidency. They feared a tyrant could manipulate public opinion and come to power. Hamilton wrote in the Federalist Papers: (Still the electoral college preferred Trump over Hillary)

It was equally desirable, that the immediate election should be made by men most capable of analyzing the qualities adapted to the station, and acting under circumstances favorable to deliberation, and to a judicious combination of all the reasons and inducements which were proper to govern their choice. A small number of persons, selected by their fellow-citizens from the general mass, will be most likely to possess the information and discernment requisite to such complicated investigations. It was also peculiarly desirable to afford as little opportunity as possible to tumult and disorder. This evil was not least to be dreaded in the election of a magistrate, who was to have so important an agency in the administration of the government as the President of the United States. But the precautions which have been so happily concerted in the system under consideration, promise an effectual security against this mischief.
 
There was no Hillary uranium scandal and never was, just another figment of right wing imagination.

The Liberal NY Times says that there was a Uranium deal between Hillary and Russia

https://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/...d-for-control-of-uranium-company.html?mcubz=0

The headline on the website Pravda trumpeted President Vladimir V. Putin’s latest coup, its nationalistic fervor recalling an era when its precursor served as the official mouthpiece of the Kremlin: “Russian Nuclear Energy Conquers the World.”

The article, in January 2013, detailed how the Russian atomic energy agency, Rosatom, had taken over a Canadian company with uranium-mining stakes stretching from Central Asia to the American West. The deal made Rosatom one of the world’s largest uranium producers and brought Mr. Putin closer to his goal of controlling much of the global uranium supply chain.

But the untold story behind that story is one that involves not just the Russian president, but also a former American president and a woman who would like to be the next one.

At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.





Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton
 
Better question, why would the Russians want to influence the elections? Did they think Hillary was, or would be, in their pocket and the entire attempt misfired? I don't see how they would benefit from Trump being in office.
 
Remember the wailing, the bellowing, the screaming accusations by the rightwing at the remotest possibility, the merest hint, that the Chinese influenced or aided Clinton's election in the 1990s?

I do!

WOW......how far the goal posts have been moved! It is really quite remarkable!
 
Back
Top