Oh my Fucking God!

Damocles said:
I realize that they often receive entitlement money in that form as well, yes. Are you realizing that they didn't pay yet receive money back because their income was below the taxable levels?
Click to expand...

MEatNoon said:
That may be the case in some instances and it may not be in most. You'd have to be very specific about income levels and goverment services handed back
Click to expand...

I've stated this like 10 times.
 
Desh said:
Having money does not preclude a person from being a decent honest person. There are many who make their money in honest decent ways.

I judge on the content of their souls and actions not size of their bank account.
Click to expand...

With a fair running and voting system that would not let money be a factor---the rich would have a equal shot of getting the most votes also--just like everybody else. If they were good (not the least of two evils)--I would vote for them. If they did us wrong--we would be able to replace him with another of which we did not consider a evil. This change is only going to let the contry naturally progress to the people again---just like it has naturally progressed to the elite. Right now--you have to be elite to have a good shot of winning--and that can not possiblly represent the rest of the population accuratly. I am not saying they are evil--everybody has their own interests--and those interests of theirs will naturally progress if that is all we can elect. I am just saying--let everybody have a shot of winning--and let nature take it's course. (that folks---would truly be the good for the all) We will elect more good ones than bad ones---we don't have good choices, and that has to stop if we intend to follow the constitution. Guess what---they (the elite running this country) don't intend on following the constitution. It is against their interests. Their interests only. Contibutions have a way of corrupting good poeple---there would be no contributions with my system--a free market approach of voting so exciting---80% of the population would actually vote--and feel good about their candidate.
 
Last edited:
LadyT said:
No, I not once indicated that weren't people who did not eventually get back what they put in. And once AGAIN....that was not my point nor was it ever.
Click to expand...


Oh my god, now you are claiming you did not say everyone pays income taxes on taxable income? Maybe, what you really really really meant is everyone has federal income taxes withheld? Just how inept are we to assume you are in expressing your meaning?

You are backpedaling and your making yourself look worse and worse.
 
RStringfield said:
Oh my god, now you are claiming you did not say everyone pays income taxes on taxable income? Maybe, what you really really really meant is everyone has federal income taxes withheld? Just how inept are we to assume you are in expressing your meaning?

You are backpedaling and your making yourself look worse and worse.[/QUOTE]

Just call me a Ron Paul supporter then.
Click to expand...
 
Actually, this thread shows how and why you are wrong on Paul. You jump in with little info and take off running. You don't bother to check yourself and when shown wrong you persist in denial.
 
" Today, 10:43 AM
LadyT
Coolest Member Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 8,185



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LOL.

I guess we know what it feels like to be Superfreak for a day.
For the record, little accorn didn't provide the link Dungheap did.

And SF, take note, when you're wrong, its cool to say so. This is why liberals tend to be smarter and just overall debaters, we acknowledge when we're wrong and move on and grow. Conservatives try to twist what they originally said and morph it into someting completely different. "

From the NOW thread.....
 
I return from my lunch, which I wrote off, to find a perfect done 'rote de bautre.'
 
RStringfield said:
Actually, this thread shows how and why you are wrong on Paul. You jump in with little info and take off running. You don't bother to check yourself and when shown wrong you persist in denial.
Click to expand...

Once again:

LadyT At Noon:

That may be the case in some instances and it may not be in most. You'd have to be very specific about income levels and goverment services handed back
 
RStringfield said:
Actually, this thread shows how and why you are wrong on Paul. You jump in with little info and take off running. You don't bother to check yourself and when shown wrong you persist in denial.
Click to expand...


It is an example of how the facts will crush any liberial in a good debate.

Sorry ladyT. I am not qualified to crush many liberials, and I like you because you speak your mind and also seem to accept new input---but AssHatZombie does a pretty good job of it--and he can do it consistantly because he is well versed in the facts that are not taught in liberial commie colleges today.
It all makes sence in school---but a good traditionalist/constitutionalist will have no problem smacking down any of those liberial professors with facts of ignored history.
 
Last edited:
theMAJORITY said:
It is an example of how the facts will crush any liberial in a good debate.

Sorry ladyT. I am not qualified to crush many liberials, and I like you because you speak your mind---but AssHatZombie does a pretty good job of it--and he can do it consistantly because he is well versed in the facts that are not taught in liberial commie colleges today.
It all makes sence in school---but a good traditionalist/constitutionalist will have no problem smacking down any of thsoe liberial professors.
Click to expand...

Um, has anyone noticed that this guy compliments Assface an awful lot??
 
Darla said:
Um, has anyone noticed that this guy compliments Assface an awful lot??
Click to expand...

Yep---I think he is the sharpest person on this board. By far. You should listen to him more often.

may be you can be gay---and wise. Right now--ya really have nothing going for you--and nothing to lose. hehe
 
Last edited:
LadyT said:
Once again:

LadyT At Noon:

That may be the case in some instances and it may not be in most. You'd have to be very specific about income levels and goverment services handed back
Click to expand...

And SF, take note, when you're wrong, its cool to say so. This is why liberals tend to be smarter and just overall debaters, we acknowledge when we're wrong and move on and grow. Conservatives try to twist what they originally said and morph it into someting completely different. "
 
Superfreak said:
And SF, take note, when you're wrong, its cool to say so. This is why liberals tend to be smarter and just overall debaters, we acknowledge when we're wrong and move on and grow. Conservatives try to twist what they originally said and morph it into someting completely different. "
Click to expand...


HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You need to step back more than pricks length from the liberials---so you can see that statement is true for both parties. Also note what the consertative party is turing into---liberials.--and liberials are turning into socialists/ collectivists--which is a communistic way.

I guess you are not well endowed engough to step back far enough to see that fact. Put it back in your pants--and go get a little distance from the smoke screen between the left and the right.

I have noticed that liberial gays let their dick do much of their thinking.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top