The Fake Americans Russia Created to Influence the Election -- are there any here?

blackascoal said:
It doesn't matter what the focus was on before the investigation began. Surely you know that.
Click to expand...
I do. The same thing Starr did to Clinton . SP's are unchecked/free range -and I'm sure unConstitutional
(operating like a general warrant). we killed them by Congress for a reason, but left a 'Special Counsel"
( actual title) loophole for DoJ
 
blackascoal said:
It doesn't matter what the focus was on before the investigation began. Surely you know that.
Click to expand...

that isn't up to demmycrats.......the independent voters will decide whether it matters or not.....you guys aren't ranking too highly with them at the moment.....we'll see where they stand in 2020.......
 
noise said:
I do. The same thing Starr did to Clinton . SP's are unchecked/free range -and I'm sure unConstitutional
(operating like a general warrant). we killed them by Congress for a reason, but left a 'Special Counsel"
( actual title) loophole for DoJ
Click to expand...

Something tells me you did not spend any significant amount of time whining and complaining about fairness, when Hillary Clinton was relentlessly investigated for over twenty years - starting with Whitewater - for obvious political reasons, since there was never anything found that remotely suggested criminal and illegal activity on her part.
 
Cypress said:
Something tells me you did not spend any significant amount of time whining and complaining about fairness, when Hillary Clinton was relentlessly investigated for over twenty years - starting with Whitewater - for obvious political reasons, since there was never anything found that remotely suggested criminal and illegal activity on her part.
Click to expand...
Once again you come along with your assumptions.
I was a ( blue dog)Democrat back under Bill Clinton -the party left me, i didn't leave the party.

But aside from partisan politics -if you are capable of thinking beyond such- the Starr SP indeed shows how dangerous they are.
Special prosecutor/special counsel -they are pretty much the same, except what branch of government does the appointing.

as to her criminality it's manifest she violated the Gross Negligence subsection of the Espionage Act..
Comey let her slide, writing draft letter of non-prosecution before he interviewed her of her staff/
 
noise said:
not for Russian collusion,, that is a dry hole.. however since Mueller is a special prosecutor he can go where he wants to..
So now it's nothing to do with Russian collusion, he's looking into Trumps Russian business deals,

This is just like Ken Star..don't tell me you support this shit? It was fucked up then, and it's fucked up now
Click to expand...

Well you think his dirty dealings w/ America's adversaries is fine, MOST AMERICANS DON'T & WANT TO KNOW WTF IS GOING ON..

For you & the dreckig family that is a bad thing as some of the dirty dealings & possible compromising situations & crooked deals/oligarch money laundering etc etc etc can seriously damage more than his/there shitty reputation-IT CAN COMPROMISE & DESTROY THIS NATION..............

Never before has such trash been put in such a position of power & honor, nor anyone of such questionable character....trump_in_the_gutter.jpg
 
noise said:
I do. The same thing Starr did to Clinton . SP's are unchecked/free range -and I'm sure unConstitutional
(operating like a general warrant). we killed them by Congress for a reason, but left a 'Special Counsel"
( actual title) loophole for DoJ
Click to expand...

Well you should be "confident" that your hero & his dealings are all on the up & up....... Oddly, or not :whome: there seems to be a lack of that "confidence"...
 
Bill said:
Well you should be "confident" that your hero & his dealings are all on the up & up....... Oddly, or not :whome: there seems to be a lack of that "confidence"...
Click to expand...
SP has no business checking them out , unless they are directly related to "Russian collusion" on the election.

SP is the very definition of "mission creep"
 
This is all very reminiscent of the 'reds under the beds' era, except this time round it is the Left not the Right acting like Joe McCarthy.
 
Bill said:
Such a narrow confidence... Are you as confident they won't find something else, other dirty dealings etc??
Click to expand...

I am sure lib'ruls will holler than anything they find is "dirty dealings" and "vile capitalism"........I have no intent to support impeachment over something that a business man did before taking office.......and demmycrats already established that as their position when they elected the protege of Ayers for president......did anyone on Trump's campaign blow up post offices?.....
 
blackascoal said:
Sometimes an international offensive begins with a few shots that draw little notice. So it was last year when Melvin Redick of Harrisburg, Pa., a friendly-looking American with a backward baseball cap and a young daughter, posted on Facebook a link to a brand-new website.

“These guys show hidden truth about Hillary Clinton, George Soros and other leaders of the US,” he wrote on June 8, 2016. “Visit #DCLeaks website. It’s really interesting!”

Mr. Redick turned out to be a remarkably elusive character. No Melvin Redick appears in Pennsylvania records, and his photos seem to be borrowed from an unsuspecting Brazilian. But this fictional concoction has earned a small spot in history: The Redick posts that morning were among the first public signs of an unprecedented foreign intervention in American democracy.

The DCLeaks site had gone live a few days earlier, posting the first samples of material, stolen from prominent Americans by Russian hackers, that would reverberate through the presidential election campaign and into the Trump presidency. The site’s phony promoters were in the vanguard of a cyberarmy of counterfeit Facebook and Twitter accounts, a legion of Russian-controlled impostors whose operations are still being unraveled.

The Russian information attack on the election did not stop with the hacking and leaking of Democratic emails or the fire hose of stories, true, false and in between, that battered Mrs. Clinton on Russian outlets like RT and Sputnik. Far less splashy, and far more difficult to trace, was Russia’s experimentation on Facebook and Twitter, the American companies that essentially invented the tools of social media and, in this case, did not stop them from being turned into engines of deception and propaganda.

An investigation by The New York Times, and new research from the cybersecurity firm FireEye, reveals some of the mechanisms by which suspected Russian operators used Twitter and Facebook to spread anti-Clinton messages and promote the hacked material they had leaked. On Wednesday, Facebook officials disclosed that they had shut down several hundred accounts that they believe were created by a Russian company linked to the Kremlin and used to buy $100,000 in ads pushing divisive issues during and after the American election campaign.

On Twitter, as on Facebook, Russian fingerprints are on hundreds or thousands of fake accounts that regularly posted anti-Clinton messages. Many were automated Twitter accounts, called bots, that sometimes fired off identical messages seconds apart — and in the exact alphabetical order of their made-up names, according to the FireEye researchers. On Election Day, for instance, they found that one group of Twitter bots sent out the hashtag #WarAgainstDemocrats more than 1,700 times.

The Russian efforts were sometimes crude or off-key, with a trial-and-error feel, and many of the suspect posts were not widely shared. The fakery may have added only modestly to the din of genuine American voices in the pre-election melee, but it helped fuel a fire of anger and suspicion in a polarized country

Given the powerful role of social media in political contests, understanding the Russian efforts will be crucial in preventing or blunting similar, or more sophisticated, attacks in the 2018 congressional races and the 2020 presidential election. Multiple government agencies have investigated the Russian attack, though it remains unclear whether any agency is focused specifically on tracking foreign intervention in social media. Both Facebook and Twitter say they are studying the 2016 experience and how to defend against such meddling.

Russia has been quite open about playing its hacking card. In February last year, at a conference in Moscow, a top cyberintelligence adviser to President Vladimir V. Putin hinted that Russia was about to unleash a devastating information attack on the United States.

“We are living in 1948,” said the adviser, Andrey Krutskikh, referring to the eve of the first Soviet atomic bomb test, in a speech reported by The Washington Post. “I’m warning you: We are at the verge of having something in the information arena that will allow to us to talk to the Americans as equals.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/...st-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Click to expand...

Now....the demwits are blaming other's for their stupidity? Really? Let's silence the web and allow Big Brother to control the content and context the way they have controlled the state run media on the left...that sounds like a solution for 2018. To hell with the first amendment..right you Black Marxist traitor? ;)
 
noise said:
SP has no business checking them out , unless they are directly related to "Russian collusion" on the election.

SP is the very definition of "mission creep"
Click to expand...

???Was this meant to display your confidence??

I believe some dirt will surface, & I also believe that you & other fans believe so as well...... Thus the fear & hostility....

Unfortunately this will be another stain placed on the country by him & his band of pilfering offspring & loyal leeches...
 
Corazón said:
This is all very reminiscent of the 'reds under the beds' era, except this time round it is the Left not the Right acting like Joe McCarthy.
Click to expand...

mccarthy....:rofl2: as bad as ppl comparing trump, obama, bush etc w/ hitler=cliché'........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
have no intent to support impeachment over something that a business man did before taking office.....
Click to expand...

No need to start apologizing for the crooked dealings of you hero before the evidence has been shown...:rofl2:

You would not hold him accountable under any circumstances nor for any reason-NO FUCKIN SURPRISE HERE!!!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top