DACA.... Dreamers! Where do you stand?

[christiefan915]

Be honest.

Admit that there is nothing but hate in your heart for the man because you blame him for taking your beloved Hillary's "turn" to be president.

Admit that if Trump was still a DEMOCRAT you'd be all about everything he says and does.

Let's pretend that it's 2016 during the campaign, and everything about trump is the same except he's a Democrat. I would still be forced to acknowledge all the lying, bad behaviour and general nastiness that's been on the record for years.

Sorry but character still counts for something.

 

[Русский агент]

Let's pretend that it's 2016 during the campaign, and everything about trump is the same except he's a Democrat. I would still be forced to acknowledge all the lying, bad behaviour and general nastiness that's been on the record for years.

Sorry but character still counts for something.

You think Hillary has "character"?

Admit it. If Her Hillyness hadn't insisted that it was "her turn" and Trump had been the DEMOCRAT candidate you'd be praising him and defending him no matter what.

You'd wring out Hillary's Depends and make soup out of the squeezings if you could.

Admit it.

 

[canceled.2021.1]

DREAMER Shot Young Man To Death In Arizona


Police arrested and charged Fernando Enriquez, 15, of Flagstaff Tuesday night with homicide. He is accused of killing Flagstaff resident Jacob M. Allen, 20, who was shot and killed in the men’s bathroom of the rec center.

Enriquez is being charged as an adult and was booked into Coconino County Jail.

Enriquez, whose name was not made public in earlier reports, was also shot during the incident. Police said he fled the scene but was identified and taken to Flagstaff Medical Center. He arrested directly after his release from FMC.

Allen was found by rec center staff, who immediately began unsuccessful lifesaving attempts before the arrival of police and emergency personnel.

Police have confirmed that two firearms were involved in the incident, but only one has been found. Police have not publicly identified the owner of the found handgun and are asking for assistance in finding the second firearm.

The police report did not state the reason for the shooting or why Allen and Enriquez were in the bathroom at the same time. However, police have confirmed that the crime was not a random act and no further suspects are being sought.


http://www.illegalaliencrimereport.com/murder/dreamer-shot-young-man-to-death-in-arizona/

But he is here "through no fault of his own"

Maybe his Dream was to kill an American. Gayrod wants him to,have his dream

These libtards are so warped they probably wouldn't care if it was their own kids getting murdered by the precious "dreamer"

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Let's pretend that it's 2016 during the campaign, and everything about trump is the same except he's a Democrat. I would still be forced to acknowledge all the lying, bad behaviour and general nastiness that's been on the record for years.

Sorry but character still counts for something.

Bullshit liar. If Trump were a democrat you and Rana would have t shirts saying "GRAB OUR WRINKLED GREY PUSSIES"

 

[Русский агент]

But he is here "through no fault of his own"

Maybe his Dream was to kill an American. Gayrod wants him to,have his dream

These libtards are so warped they probably wouldn't care if it was their own kids getting murdered by the precious "dreamer"

Maybe they would consider the murder of their own kids a free, very late term abortion.

 

[Русский агент]

Bullshit liar. If Trump were a democrat you and Rana would have t shirts saying "GRAB OUR WRINKLED GREY PUSSIES"

 

[Русский агент]

Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) abandoned required background checks for Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) directive, which grants illegal aliens a two-year deferment from deportation.

Acting on a tip from a whistleblower at a federal law enforcement agency, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request with DHS, for “all communications, memoranda, emails, policy guidance, directives, initiatives, and any other correspondence respecting the scope and extent of background checks to be performed (or not) on aliens applying to the Obama administration’s DACA program.”

The FOIA was filed on October 26, 2012. The FOIA documents reveal a costly, haphazard process, with only cursory review for the backgrounds of illegal aliens seeking “deferred status.”

Document highlights include:

In a series of agency memos beginning in September 14, 2012, field offices were told to expect the National Benefits Center (which collects all DACA applications) to conduct only “lean & lite” background checks on illegal alien applicants, and that, henceforth, “NBC will not perform full TECS checks or any evidence review on these cases before we ship to the field.”

An October 14 memo reiterated that under the new “lean and lite” policy, “Hits will be sent to the field without resolution.”

An email chain from September 5 and through November 14 indicates managerial pressure not to turn any illegal alien applicant away for lack of ID, including the explicit directive in an October 3 memo, “Biometric processing should not be refused solely because an applicant does not present an acceptable ID.”

On November 9, 2012, just three days after Obama was reelected, in an “!!! IMPORTANT DACA MESSAGE!!! The agency was directed to: “Please put all DACA work on hold until further notice.”

There are no later-dated documents in the production to indicate if USCIS ever resumed DACA background checks.

The documents also reveal that, contrary to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano’s claim that DACA applied only to minors who came to this country illegally “through no fault of their own,” the directive actually created a new avenue of chain migration, whereby immediate relatives of DACA requesters could be approved for amnesty.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/homeland-security-documents-reveal-dhs-abandoned-required-illegal-alien-background-checks-to-meet-flood-of-amnesty-requests-following-obamas-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-directive/

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Has Nancy Pelosi brought DACA amnesty up for a vote on the floor of the House yet? I heard she struck a deal so surely she will bring it up for a vote very soon


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Does anybody really want to throw out good, educated and accomplished young people who have jobs, some serving in the military? Really!.....

I have no problem keeping the ones that are here, but to allow such a law to continue as it has undermines the heart of the law. The spirit of the law was not to inspire illegal immigration just to have a kid born here, it needs to change.

 

[Русский агент]

I have no problem keeping the ones that are here, but to allow such a law to continue as it has undermines the heart of the law. The spirit of the law was not to inspire illegal immigration just to have a kid born here, it needs to change.

The so-called "Dreamers" who were granted a temporary reprieve by The Obama's DACA Executive Order weren't born here.

You're thinking of anchor babies, perhaps.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

The so-called "Dreamers" who were granted a temporary reprieve by The Obama's DACA Executive Order weren't born here.

You're thinking of anchor babies, perhaps.

Shows how much I follow that issue, LOL.

I see now, well, in essence it is like treating them like anchor babies. The law needs to change. We are basically encouraging illegal immigration for those with young children. That is both dangerous and against our nation's laws. There has to be another way.

Do these kids automatically get citizenship or do they have to apply?

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

POST OF THE YEAR!!!!

Thank you sir.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

POST OF THE YEAR!!!!

I told you what a hack you are, that no matter what Trump does, you will find fault. He reaches across the aisle and you and racist Bukkkle think he is bending the knee.

You people are the reason we have such division in politics.

 

[Русский агент]

Shows how much I follow that issue, LOL.

I see now, well, in essence it is like treating them like anchor babies. The law needs to change. We are basically encouraging illegal immigration for those with young children. That is both dangerous and against our nation's laws. There has to be another way.

Do these kids automatically get citizenship or do they have to apply?

They have to apply. DACA was a temporary measure that The Obama decreed by Executive Order when Congress wouldn't pass the DREAM Act.

Many constitutional scholars think he exceeded his authority by making an end run around Congress.

Be that as it may, to his credit even The Obama told the Dreamers that it was a only temporary stay of deportation and it could be revoked at any time.

The deferment (that's what it is) which they had to apply for, is only good as long as the Executive order stands.

Trump has given Congress 6 months to pass legislation which would grant Dreamers the opportunity to become citizens. Nobody knows how that law will read, because it hasn't bee drafted or proposed yet, much less debated or amended.

In the meantime POTUS will not rescind The Obama's Executive Order. No new applications will be accepted for DACA, and no new work permits will be issued during the interim.

It's worth noting that Congress has never passed an amnesty for illegals (which is what the DREAM act was) despite repeated attempts. The first legislation was introduced ages ago (2001), and the Congress has never acted on it.

Anchors babies are not going away. The concept of jus soli is constitutional.

The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution indicates that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The Supreme Court of the United States affirmed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship for nearly all individuals born in the United States, provided that their parents are foreign citizens, have permanent domicile status in the United States, and are engaging in business in the United States except performing in a diplomatic or official capacity of a foreign power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby

Silly Billy, a liberal, made a thread the other day complaining about anchor babies. Why would a liberal be opposed to anchor babies?

Because he saw a story that said that Russians were coming to the US and renting Trump-branded condos for the purpose of allowing their child to be born a US citizen.

That hypocrisy of the liberals on this issue is astounding. I made a thread earlier that shows Crooked Hillary, Cryin' Chuck and other DEMOCRATS saying the same thing in essence that Trump does: Deport all illegals.

Naturally the libs had nothing to say, so they slunk away in shame.

 

[Русский агент]

People have gone through the legal process and spent years to become citizens. Giving a free pass to anchor babies is a slap in the face to those people.

But I defer to his dealmaking skills and grand plan. There has to be a give and take and I'm good with it. Still much better than the gridlock and hate we saw during Obama's terms.

Anchor babies have nothing to do with DACA.

The concept of birthright citizenship is constitutional.

The problem with the so-called "Dreamers" is that they are illegal aliens who weren't born here.

 

[Buckly J. Ewer]

Anchor babies have nothing to do with DACA.

The concept of birthright citizenship is constitutional.

The problem with the so-called "Dreamers" is that they are illegal aliens who weren't born here.

The orange clown has gotten past their illegal status and bent the knee to the Democrats arguments that the dreamers are an upstanding, tax paying and military serving, productive part of American society...
DACA is here to stay, much to the disappointment of your stupid redneck racist friend
Your stupid redneck racist friend thinks dreamers are anchor babies?...LOL!

 

[canceled.2021.1]

Has Nancy Pelosi brought the DACA bill to the floor of the House yet? I hear there is a deal


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

 

[Darth Omar]

They have to apply. DACA was a temporary measure that The Obama decreed by Executive Order when Congress wouldn't pass the DREAM Act.

Many constitutional scholars think he exceeded his authority by making an end run around Congress.

Be that as it may, to his credit even The Obama told the Dreamers that it was a only temporary stay of deportation and it could be revoked at any time.

The deferment (that's what it is) which they had to apply for, is only good as long as the Executive order stands.

Trump has given Congress 6 months to pass legislation which would grant Dreamers the opportunity to become citizens. Nobody knows how that law will read, because it hasn't bee drafted or proposed yet, much less debated or amended.

In the meantime POTUS will not rescind The Obama's Executive Order. No new applications will be accepted for DACA, and no new work permits will be issued during the interim.

It's worth noting that Congress has never passed an amnesty for illegals (which is what the DREAM act was) despite repeated attempts. The first legislation was introduced ages ago (2001), and the Congress has never acted on it.

Anchors babies are not going away. The concept of jus soli is constitutional.

The Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution indicates that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

The Supreme Court of the United States affirmed in United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898), that the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees citizenship for nearly all individuals born in the United States, provided that their parents are foreign citizens, have permanent domicile status in the United States, and are engaging in business in the United States except performing in a diplomatic or official capacity of a foreign power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchor_baby

Silly Billy, a liberal, made a thread the other day complaining about anchor babies. Why would a liberal be opposed to anchor babies?

Because he saw a story that said that Russians were coming to the US and renting Trump-branded condos for the purpose of allowing their child to be born a US citizen.

That hypocrisy of the liberals on this issue is astounding. I made a thread earlier that shows Crooked Hillary, Cryin' Chuck and other DEMOCRATS saying the same thing in essence that Trump does: Deport all illegals.

Naturally the libs had nothing to say, so they slunk away in shame.

Why don't these people just apply for citizenship? Make it so they are safe from deportation so long as they are making an effort to *learn english* and become legal citizens.

I don't understand what the problem is. And I'm ok with knee-bending so long as Chuck and Nancy are willing to reciprocate on tax reform or the wall.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

You're not aware, period. He campaigned on ending it.

and he has ended it.......now, Congress MAY come up with a bilateral replacement for it, or they may not.....but it IS ended.......

 

[Phantasmal]

It is very obvious from reading certain posters that they shouldn't discuss DACA because they have no idea what it is, or who it involves, they aren't anchor babies and they speak English.