Another Clinton lie

Mr.Badguy said:
Only in the same way you contribute to Hillary's income anytime you watch something about her.
Click to expand...

Is that right? False equivalency.

I just checked and Alex Jones gets income from each view on YouTube.

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...alex-jones-harassment-and-hate-youtube/215824

According to Media Matters, Y O U are supporting hate.

You say that watching YouTube news clips about Her Hillyness (who won't go away) puts money in her already-bulging coffers?

Let's see the evidence for that bold assertion.

I'll wait.
 
archives said:
Always entertaining to see the right just can't shake their Hillary obsession, now they got her killing people and running for President in 2020, always earns a chuckle
Click to expand...

The obsession is like that of a cat that catches a mouse and plays with it until it dies or plays dead long enough, then we will get bored and walk away.
 
God bless America said:
Is that right? False equivalency.

I just checked and Alex Jones gets income from each view on YouTube.

https://www.mediamatters.org/blog/2...alex-jones-harassment-and-hate-youtube/215824

According to Media Matters, Y O U are supporting hate.

You say that watching YouTube news clips about Her Hillyness (who won't go away) puts money in her already-bulging coffers?

Let's see the evidence for that bold assertion.

I'll wait.
Click to expand...

If you must know, and apparently you MUST, I don't watch the Info Wars channel on YouTube. I typically see Alex Jones in compilations created by other YouTubers. So, my viewership of him only contributes to his income in the sense that keeping anyone in the public eye does.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
If you must know, and apparently you MUST, I don't watch the Info Wars channel on YouTube. I typically see Alex Jones in compilations created by other YouTubers. So, my viewership of him only contributes to his income in the sense that keeping anyone in the public eye does.
Click to expand...

I am disappointed. It appears to me that you clearly intended to convey the impression that you gleaned your knowledge of Mr. Jones first-hand. Now you confess that you don't watch his YouTube channels after it's pointed out to you that he derives income from that practice.

Would you be suspicious if you were in my position here?

BTW, where is your proof that I enrich Her Hillyness by watching news clips of her speaking? That is what you claimed, right?
 
God bless America said:
I am disappointed. It appears to me that you clearly intended to convey the impression that you gleaned your knowledge of Mr. Jones first-hand. Now you confess that you don't watch his YouTube channels after it's pointed out to you that he derives income from that practice.

Would you be suspicious if you were in my position here?

BTW, where is your proof that I enrich Her Hillyness by watching news clips of her speaking? That is what you claimed, right?
Click to expand...

You produce ad revenue to whatever outlet posts stories about her, such as in the op. This makes her a hotter commodity to whatever sites you visit. This makes demand for her go up among interviewers. She gets paid for interviews. Do you really not know how any of this works?
 
domer76 said:
When, exactly, will you obsessed idiots get bored and walk away? No sign of it yet.
Click to expand...

I already told you, as long as SHE keeps twitching and moaning in the media, she will be a fun toy to toss about. It's up to her.

At least we only mock and ridicule her for fun (and because she deserves it) unlike the intolerant, sometimes violent, oppression of free speech from the left.

K6Jpn42CoSo_en6jQGnd8WXSu5WnQcUm5paJalHH7N0.jpg
 
Last edited:
Mr.Badguy said:
To clarify a bit better, you contribute to her "viral" status.
Click to expand...

Weak, and does not come close to proving your claim.

Mr.Badguy said:
Only in the same way you contribute to Hillary's income anytime you watch something about her.
Click to expand...

If you propose that I increase Her Hillyness' income by watching Fox News and other media clips on YouTube, you cannot therefore deny that you increase the wealth of Mr. Jones by watching third-party clips featuring him on YouTube.

Mr.Badguy said:
I don't watch the Info Wars channel on YouTube. I typically see Alex Jones in compilations created by other YouTubers. So, my viewership of him only contributes to his income in the sense that keeping anyone in the public eye does.
Click to expand...

Your claim that I increase Her Hillyness' vast fortune by watching news reports about her because "she is paid for interviews" is also flimsy.

First, very few clips are "interviews". Many are of her speeches, and they don't include the ones she sold to Goldman-Sachs.

Second, where is your evidence that she demands payment for granting an interview to journalists? I actually hope you have some, BTW, since that would make the old hagling as even more venal.

The thought that I might increase her popularity with the media is prima facie laughable. She is a shameless self-promoter who is fawned over the the DEMOCRAT-infested liberal media without any meager assistance from me.

Try again.
 
You know, I could have just said "I don't contribute to his income" but that would have been untruthful. Can't say I'm not entertained by your mental gymnastics trying to prove you don't contribute to Hillary being in the public eye and profiting off of it though.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
You know, I could have just said "I don't contribute to his income" but that would have been untruthful. Can't say I'm not entertained by your mental gymnastics trying to prove you don't contribute to Hillary being in the public eye and profiting off of it though.
Click to expand...

Now you expect me to prove a negative after you made a claim that embarrasses you because you cannot back it up?

I guess I am not surprised. If you were intelligent enough to refrain from indulging in fallacious arguments, your title would be "Moderate Conservative".
 
God bless America said:
Now you expect me to prove a negative after you made a claim that embarrasses you because you cannot back it up?

I guess I am not surprised. If you were intelligent enough to refrain from indulging in fallacious arguments, your title would be "Moderate Conservative".
Click to expand...

I don't expect you to prove anything, but you seem desperate to anyway.
 
God bless America said:
I never said you did. Archives said "the right" is obsessed, in this thread. I am on the right.



Are you saying I'm not obsessed? Good.

Then you won't be able to tell me how I'm the obsessed one - as Archives claims, will you?

When does the Alex Jones show come on?

How about Rush Limbaugh?

:rofl2:
Click to expand...

You asked Mr Badguy to "tell you again" how you are obssesed.

He never said you were.

IOW...you were LYING.

Not that anyone is surprised.
 
God bless America said:
I am disappointed. It appears to me that you clearly intended to convey the impression that you gleaned your knowledge of Mr. Jones first-hand. Now you confess that you don't watch his YouTube channels after it's pointed out to you that he derives income from that practice.

Would you be suspicious if you were in my position here?

BTW, where is your proof that I enrich Her Hillyness by watching news clips of her speaking? That is what you claimed, right?
Click to expand...

ROFL!

"It appears to me..."

"Clearly intended to..."

GBA doing a whole lot of ASSuming!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top