Hillary! for 2020

dukkha

Verified User
HRC likely sees an opening in 2020 for another presidential run.

Over the last few days, I have spoken to a number of Republicans and Democrats regarding this possibility. One Republican kept asking: “Why are so many Democrats still deferential and respectful to the Clintons, and especially Hillary? She is yesterday’s news now — swept into the dustbin of history.”

Not so fast, I cautioned the distressed Republican. Influential establishment Democrats — just like influential establishment Republicans — are mostly interested in what is best for them. They elevate the definition of “craven” to an entirely new level.

With regard to the 2020 presidential primary, these entrenched political bigwigs simply want to be seen as backing the winning candidate and will switch politicians as many times as needed to position themselves with the victor.

Then, when the winner finally emerges, these faux-sycophants will enthusiastically rubber-stamp any pronouncement by the candidate to cement their position.

If the candidate says, “The sky looks green,” they will scream in unison, “Yes, hunter green!”

In this particular case, prominent “mainstream” Democrats will almost always be concerned about their own advancement or maintaining their base of power, and no one understands this better than Hillary Clinton.

There are no shortages of opinions on both sides regarding the former secretary of state. Leaving aside that almost endless and polarized list, four things Clinton is for sure are: intelligent, tough, vindictive and a survivor.

No one has to tell Clinton that the emerging Democratic field for 2020 is weak at best. Likewise, for the key “queen-” or “king-” makers in the Democratic Party.

The party as a whole — along with its supporters in the mainstream media, the entertainment community and academia — has been driven to the point of rage-filled incoherence because of the election of Donald Trump. Many of these Democrats, journalists, celebrities and academics are no longer capable of giving a rational assessment of the Trump presidency. Rather, they cover you in spittle as they call the president everything from a puppy murderer to a war criminal.

To say Democrats are desperate to defeat President Trump in 2020 would be the political understatement of modern politics.

From this mindless madness emerges Hillary Clinton.

I believe she does see a legitimate opening in 2020. I think she does want to avenge her embarrassing loss to Donald Trump. And I’m convinced she will still have the fire in her belly to go through the grueling process one more time to become president.

The current Democratic presidential hopefuls are probably frustrated and fearful that Clinton’s post-mortem book on the 2016 election titled “What Happened,” could muddy the waters for 2020.

Politically, I see the forthcoming memoir as a brilliant move. Leaving aside whatever revisionist history there might be in the book, its publication amplifies the No. 1 question Clinton wants to implant in the minds of influential Democrats and voters. That being: What if? What if Clinton is still viable for 2020? What if she runs? What if she gets the nomination? What if she wins the presidency?

Hence the deferential treatment and respect.

As I write this — just weeks before its publication — Clinton’s book has claimed the No. 1 best-seller spot on Amazon. And, like her or not, it is safe to predict that it’s going to be a massive best-seller. More than being a best-seller, it is going to accomplish her No. 1 goal, and that is keeping her name in the 2020 presidential discussions.

Over the years, I advised clients and politicians that the best way to “win” is to be brutally honest about yourself, your business or your product.

Not surprisingly, many people don’t like to focus on or admit to their weaknesses. But if this process is followed, hints, signs and patterns will emerge.

As of now, there are real signs popping up that Hillary Clinton still is a political force to be reckoned with and that a path could be cleared for her in 2020.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-perspec-hillary-clinton-2020-0901-story.html
 
How can anyone say at this point that the '20 field is "weak"? Obama came out of nowhere, Trump came out of nowhere. No one has any idea who will run.

Give me a break w/ this stuff. Hillary doesn't get a 2nd chance after gifting the election to a loon like Trump. She might run, but Dems will not support her & she will not get traction.

Wishful thinking on your part.
 
“Why are so many Democrats still deferential and respectful to the Clintons, and especially Hillary? She is yesterday’s news now — swept into the dustbin of history.”

The Democratic Party is not like your party. Your party nominated George Dumbya Bush, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, and a deranged reality TV star named Donald Drumpf.

Of course from the Republican perspective there is good reason to be ashamed of your chosen leaders, an inclination to want to sweep them under the rug. I mean, George Dumbya, Cheney, and Palin can't even show their faces at Republican National Conventions. They are persona non grata, and for good reason. Your party would like to forget you were ever their cheerleaders.

The Democratic Party, generally, does not have that problem. I am proud of my votes for Sec State Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton. They are respected elder Statesmen and women of the party. I believe that is a widespread, if not universal sentiment, in the Democratic Party.

On a tangent, I question your political acumen if you put any weight on the author's opinion. This guy is an obscure, third-rate political analyst, and this article reads to me like something he threw together at the last minute to meet a publication deadline. It's garbage.
 
"Over the years, I advised clients and politicians that the best way to “win” is to be brutally honest about yourself, your business or your product."

Since she's a whiner who blames everything and everyone else for her own failures...I say the Dems will not nominate her.
 
"Over the years, I advised clients and politicians that the best way to “win” is to be brutally honest about yourself, your business or your product."

Since she's a whiner who blames everything and everyone else for her own failures...I say the Dems will not nominate her.

The DEMOCRATS found out that she's a whiner who blames everything and everyone else for her own failures when she lost to The Obama, and yet...
 
HRC likely sees an opening in 2020 for another presidential run.

Over the last few days, I have spoken to a number of Republicans and Democrats regarding this possibility. One Republican kept asking: “Why are so many Democrats still deferential and respectful to the Clintons, and especially Hillary? She is yesterday’s news now — swept into the dustbin of history.”

Not so fast, I cautioned the distressed Republican. Influential establishment Democrats — just like influential establishment Republicans — are mostly interested in what is best for them. They elevate the definition of “craven” to an entirely new level.

With regard to the 2020 presidential primary, these entrenched political bigwigs simply want to be seen as backing the winning candidate and will switch politicians as many times as needed to position themselves with the victor.

Then, when the winner finally emerges, these faux-sycophants will enthusiastically rubber-stamp any pronouncement by the candidate to cement their position.

If the candidate says, “The sky looks green,” they will scream in unison, “Yes, hunter green!”

In this particular case, prominent “mainstream” Democrats will almost always be concerned about their own advancement or maintaining their base of power, and no one understands this better than Hillary Clinton.

There are no shortages of opinions on both sides regarding the former secretary of state. Leaving aside that almost endless and polarized list, four things Clinton is for sure are: intelligent, tough, vindictive and a survivor.

No one has to tell Clinton that the emerging Democratic field for 2020 is weak at best. Likewise, for the key “queen-” or “king-” makers in the Democratic Party.

The party as a whole — along with its supporters in the mainstream media, the entertainment community and academia — has been driven to the point of rage-filled incoherence because of the election of Donald Trump. Many of these Democrats, journalists, celebrities and academics are no longer capable of giving a rational assessment of the Trump presidency. Rather, they cover you in spittle as they call the president everything from a puppy murderer to a war criminal.

To say Democrats are desperate to defeat President Trump in 2020 would be the political understatement of modern politics.

From this mindless madness emerges Hillary Clinton.

I believe she does see a legitimate opening in 2020. I think she does want to avenge her embarrassing loss to Donald Trump. And I’m convinced she will still have the fire in her belly to go through the grueling process one more time to become president.

The current Democratic presidential hopefuls are probably frustrated and fearful that Clinton’s post-mortem book on the 2016 election titled “What Happened,” could muddy the waters for 2020.

Politically, I see the forthcoming memoir as a brilliant move. Leaving aside whatever revisionist history there might be in the book, its publication amplifies the No. 1 question Clinton wants to implant in the minds of influential Democrats and voters. That being: What if? What if Clinton is still viable for 2020? What if she runs? What if she gets the nomination? What if she wins the presidency?

Hence the deferential treatment and respect.

As I write this — just weeks before its publication — Clinton’s book has claimed the No. 1 best-seller spot on Amazon. And, like her or not, it is safe to predict that it’s going to be a massive best-seller. More than being a best-seller, it is going to accomplish her No. 1 goal, and that is keeping her name in the 2020 presidential discussions.

Over the years, I advised clients and politicians that the best way to “win” is to be brutally honest about yourself, your business or your product.

Not surprisingly, many people don’t like to focus on or admit to their weaknesses. But if this process is followed, hints, signs and patterns will emerge.

As of now, there are real signs popping up that Hillary Clinton still is a political force to be reckoned with and that a path could be cleared for her in 2020.
http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...-perspec-hillary-clinton-2020-0901-story.html
why not slick willy again? at least that lying pervert actually won.
 
The Democratic Party is not like your party. Your party nominated George Dumbya Bush, Dick Cheney, Sarah Palin, and a deranged reality TV star named Donald Drumpf.

Of course from the Republican perspective there is good reason to be ashamed of your chosen leaders, an inclination to want to sweep them under the rug. I mean, George Dumbya, Cheney, and Palin can't even show their faces at Republican National Conventions. They are persona non grata, and for good reason. Your party would like to forget you were ever their cheerleaders.

The Democratic Party, generally, does not have that problem. I am proud of my votes for Sec State Clinton, Barack Obama, John Kerry, Al Gore, and Bill Clinton. They are respected elder Statesmen and women of the party. I believe that is a widespread, if not universal sentiment, in the Democratic Party.

On a tangent, I question your political acumen if you put any weight on the author's opinion. This guy is an obscure, third-rate political analyst, and this article reads to me like something he threw together at the last minute to meet a publication deadline. It's garbage.

Hillary was the second most disliked candidate to run for President in the past 50 years. From a partisan perspective by all means keep her at the forefront
 
She might run, but Dems will not support her & she will not get traction.

All pay heed and tremble!

The High Oracle of Situational Selectivity (HOSS) hath proclaimed His prophecy.

Doubters are invited to peruse His flawless record of perfect prognosticatative pronouncements.

:rofl2:
 
Hillary was the second most disliked candidate to run for President in the past 50 years. From a partisan perspective by all means keep her at the forefront

I keep hearing that she is the most qualified candidate to ever run for president, so there's that.
 
Yeah, I know. That comment was just more of a shot at the penis envier and her dickhead husband. ;)


The last election showed the lengths the Clinton crime family will go to to grab the nomination.

Crooked Hillary colluded with Dirty Debbie Wasserman Schultz to cheat Bernie, and the whole world knows it.

I have no reason to think she won't try again.
 
She felt the Bern, now she blames the Bern. :rofl2:

And instead of calling her out, Bernie offers olive branch; after she blamed him for the defeat.

Typical weak socialist. Can't imagine if he was in power. "Hey Kim Jung Un, keep those missiles coming, its okay, we are bad!"
 
And instead of calling her out, Bernie offers olive branch; after she blamed him for the defeat.

Typical weak socialist. Can't imagine if he was in power. "Hey Kim Jung Un, keep those missiles coming, its okay, we are bad!"


Not only do DEMOCRATS coddle their fellow leftists in North Korea, for more than three decades, DEMOCRATS have done everything in their power to prevent, obstruct or delay the deployment of America's ballistic missile defense.

Opposition to missile defense has been an article of faith for DEMOCRATS since Reagan announced the Strategic Defense Initiative in 1983.

DEMOCRAT Chappaquiddick Ted Kennedy led the early opposition to what DEMOCRATS derisively labeled “Star Wars,” denouncing missile defense as a “mirage” and “a certain prescription for an arms race in outer space.”

Running against Reagan in 1984, DEMOCRAT Walter Mondale called it a “dangerously destabilizing” and unworkable “hoax.”

Reagan moved forward, and George H. W. Bush, put missile defense on track for deployment with the Global Protection Against Limited Strikes (GPALS) program.

But as soon as DEMOCRAT Bill Clinton infested the Oval Office in 1993, he terminated GPALS and cut national missile defense funding by 80 percent, and downgraded missile defense from an acquisition program to a technology demonstration program.

DEMOCRAT Clinton also signed an agreement to revive the moribund Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which banned deployment of missile defense and whose status had come into question with the 1991 collapse of our treaty partner, the Soviet Union.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/how-democrats-left-us-vulnerable-to-north-koreas-nukes/2017/09/06/534e7cc2-9302-11e7-89fa-bb822a46da5b_story.html?utm_term=.7e08890fa4d2
 
Back
Top