Two different analogies- no rule says that they have to relate in every detail.
If you jump into the conversation, you're involved regardless of how much or how little.
Two different analogies- no rule says that they have to relate in every detail.
You logic failed several posts ago.If you jump into the conversation, you're involved regardless of how much or how little.
You logic failed several posts ago.
Your cowardice showed itself the first time you denied being involved in something to which you responded.
OIC. So I'm a coward for pointing out your logical fallacy. Now you're doubling down...
For claiming you're not part of a conversation to which you responded. You're part of it whether you're man enough to admit it or not.
LOL So now my manhood's in question because I pointed out your logical fallacy. You're digging an even deeper hole.
You're manhood was in question before you posted anything. Don't be confused.
I've lost count of your logical fallacies here. LOL
You've proven you're not a man.
You've proven that you can't debate.
nor can he keep track of his wifes outside amorous activities, but i digress
You just committed a logical fallacy yourself, and a rather low one at that.
yeah, but for him I don't mind stooping that law............sometimes. especially since he likes to start the crap.
The lowest I choose to go is to call someone (who called others skank) a cunt. I draw the line at family members. Apparently I grew up in a different culture.
no, I don't think you grew up in a different culture, not any different than me anyway. I simply have no problem dishing out the same shit others shovel at me. you'll notice that I don't attack other forum members family for that reason.