so you think going around making false allegations makes you right? ROFL
Tell us truthfully, you married Evince, didn't you? you two sound exactly alike.
You unwilling to provide evidence to back up your claim that you weren't is proof.
so you think going around making false allegations makes you right? ROFL
Tell us truthfully, you married Evince, didn't you? you two sound exactly alike.
Stop being a dumb, lazy ass. You made an unfounded accusation. Don't expect who you accused to prove you wrong.
If the illegals weren't where they didn't belong, it wouldn't be an issue. Amazing how choices can have negative consequences. Interesting how you're willing to overlook criminal activity.
EAT SHIT & DIE..
Oh & have a nice day..![]()
aw, triggered again. i'm really sorry about proving you wrong all the time. tell us, how do you claim to be a 'law and order' person when you don't like the laws?
Good points... He needs to pay you for all the shcoolin you gave him..feed it to me, I'll eat it.

He claimed it wasn't a dishonorable discharge and that evidence was there to prove it. Where is it?
Good points... He needs to pay you for all the shcoolin you gave him..
Use pay pal, he'll ask for your address so he can pretend to stock you....
I'm not getting involved in your squabble here.
You already have.
No. I just pointed out where you committed a glaring logical fallacy. So I got involved with your squabble with logic, not your squabble with STY.
You got involved in the conversation. Trying to separate something that can't be separated isn't logical.
That's like the driver of the getaway car in a bank robbery didn't take part in the robbery because he wasn't in the bank.
You got involved in the conversation.
people posting on an OPEN forum

A better analogy is watching a car accident happen and commenting on which driver was at fault.
This "crying pussy" was just squawking about this being an open forum![]()
If you comment, or in the case of a witness at an accident telling the officer responding to it what you say, you're involved. Your involvement is different than if you were in it but you're still involved.
That's like saying a juror is involved in the crime that he's in court for.
The juror didn't witness anything. You already said you did.
he called you out on your stupid logical fallacy. stfu and accept that you were a moron about it. you know, that whole 'being a man about it' shit that you spewed earlier but know nothing about.
The juror didn't witness anything. You already said you did.