And the beat goes on,

Notes from former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort on a meeting he attended last year with a Russian lobbyist and Donald Trump Jr. are not seen as damaging to the Trump family or campaign officials, according to government officials and others who have looked at the notes.

The Trump Tower meeting has come under scrutiny because Trump Jr. wrote in an email that he agreed to the encounter in order to find “dirt” on Hillary Clinton, and it has since become a focus for special counsel Robert Mueller. Mueller has sought to interview White House officials about the fallout, and the Russian lobbyist has testified in front of a grand jury.

The notes from the meeting do not contain any damaging information about Clinton or references to promises of damaging information about her, nor do they indicate that officials on the campaign were promising favors or seeking them in return for money, the people who’ve seen them said.

According to these people, the notes have been with Senate officials for weeks and have been reviewed by a number of people on Capitol Hill. Also in attendance at the June 2016 meeting in New York were a Russian lawyer, a Russian businessman and other Trump campaign officials, including Jared Kushner, the president’s son-in-law.


https://archive.is/vGJF1


:rofl2:
 
Darth Omar said:
What was Goldstone up to, and who put him up to conning Junior into a fake meeting about Russian dirt on Hillary? That's the million dollar question.

What is Goldstone's link to Fusion GPS?

The problem for the Collusion Seekers is that 'collusion' is a verb that denotes some kind of team work to accomplish an objective. But since the Russians had no dirt on Hillary, there can be, by definition, no collusion.

Moreover, I'm not convinced using foreign nationals for opposition research is illegal, to begin with. Didn't the Piss Dossier originate with a foreign national?

Oh wait, that's different lol.
Click to expand...
It really doesn't matter if you're convinced. It's illegal. That's all that matters
 
christiefan915 said:
:rofl2: He wanted to learn about Hillary's fitness from a Russian? I swear stupidity runs in the genes in that family.
Click to expand...
Stupidity, or delusion. I'm not sure which. They all seem to believe that everyone buys their bullshit.

For all the bluster in that family, they simply aren't intelligent enough to fabricate a lie that's believable.

Probably because in their grand daddy's real estate empire, nobody ever questioned them.
 
Althea said:
Stupidity, or delusion. I'm not sure which. They all seem to believe that everyone buys their bullshit.

For all the bluster in that family, they simply aren't intelligent enough to fabricate a lie that's believable.

Probably because in their grand daddy's real estate empire, nobody ever questioned them.
Click to expand...

Says the one that thought Obama being black was somehow a qualification for the job.

You can tell yourself all you want he did something good but in the end, he was nothing more than another unqualified black in a government job living in government housing.
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
I did read and I'm weeping, over the failure that you have once again exhibited.
11 CFR 300.2 has to do with expenditures or disbursements.

300.2 Definitions.
(a)501(c) organization that makes expenditures or disbursements in connection with a Federal election.

:facepalm:
Click to expand...

You missed this one, stupid fuck:

(e)Donation. For purposes of part 300, donation means a payment, gift, subscription, loan, advance, deposit, or anything of value given to a person, but does not include contributions.

I've been over this multiple times. How many does it take for it to sink in?
 
aloysious said:
In other words you didn't.
Click to expand...

Nope. Not in other words. In these words.

(e)Donation. For purposes of part 300, donation means a payment, gift, subscription, loan, advance, deposit, or anything of value given to a person, but does not include contributions.
 
Yaya said:
Of course to YOU, they were bogus and anything into Trump is legitimate.
Click to expand...
Really? What were the results of his myriad bogus investigations?

Cute how you already consider Mueller's investigation as much ado about nothing, while referencing 8 years of Hillary investigations.
 
Yaya said:
Of course to YOU, they were bogus and anything into Trump is legitimate.
Click to expand...

How many times was Hillary found guilty in a court of law?

What crimes has she been convicted of?

Then Y-E-S, the investigations of Hillary were bogus.
 
Althea said:
Really? What were the results of his myriad bogus investigations?

Cute how you already consider Mueller's investigation as much ado about nothing, while referencing 8 years of Hillary investigations.
Click to expand...

Allow me to sum up using a popular Right Wing colloquialism.

They investigated Hillary over and over and over and the only thing they found was a GIANT NOTHING BURGER!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top