And the beat goes on,

archives said:
No problem,

"The Crown prosecutor of Russia[a] met with his father Aras this morning and in their meeting offered to provide the Trump campaign with some official documents and information that would incriminate Hillary and her dealings with Russia and would be very useful to your father."

"This is obviously very high level and sensitive information but is part of Russia and its government’s support for Mr. Trump"

To which Don Jr replies,

" Seems we have some time and if it’s what you say I love it "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_campaign–Russian_meeting
Click to expand...

SO NOW, liberals want to believe the Russians and be buddies with them!!

OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, THE IRONY. :D
 
Althea said:
The Russians.
Click to expand...

tenor.gif
 
I wonder if Mueller will pursue these little factoids uncovered through his subpoena of the Podesta Group (yes, those Podestas):


Mueller issued subpoenas seeking testimony from executives who worked on a campaign organized by Paul Manafort – including the Podesta Group — an NBC exclusive report revealed.

The Podesta Group, co-founded by John Podesta, who was chairman of Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, was one of six lobbying firms that worked on Manafort’s campaign to get Ukraine into the European Union between 2012 to 2014 – a fact buried in the ninth paragraph of NBC’s report.

Mueller’s team is particularly interested in taking a close look at the lobbying campaign that included the Podesta Group.

NBC News reported that six firms participated in the campaign that Manafort coordinated, which was paid for by the European Center for a Modern Ukraine, a non-profit based in Brussels.

The report states that two groups, the Podesta Group and Mercury LLC, worked in Washington with Manafort’s partner Rick Gates, according to lobbying disclosure records.

“At the time, Ukraine was run by a pro-Russian political party that had paid Manafort $17 million for consulting in 2013 and 2014,” NBC News added.

The Podesta Group belatedly filed multiple new disclosures with the Department of Justice (DOJ) related to their work in the Ukraine during Manafort’s campaign.

The recent August 17 filings by the Podesta Group include registration statements for six Podesta Group employees and a list of political contributions made by “relevant employees” throughout 2013.

The Podesta Group also belatedly filed documents in April that showed dozens of previously unreported interactions:

Back in April, the powerful Washington lobbying firm run by Clinton ally Tony Podesta filed a document admitting its work for the pro-Russia European Centre for a Modern Ukraine may have principally benefited a foreign government.

New disclosures revealed dozens of previously unreported interactions the firm made with influential government offices, including Hillary Clinton’s State Department and the office of former Vice President Joe Biden, while lobbying on behalf of the center.

The Podesta Group belatedly filed several new disclosures with the Justice Department on Aug. 17 related to work the firm completed between 2012 and 2014 on behalf of a pro-Russia Ukrainian think tank.

The Podesta Group’s most recent belated filing with the DOJ on August 17 came just one day after Politico reported that a “Ukrainian member of parliament requested a criminal investigation into possible meddling by his country’s government into last year’s U.S. presidential elections.”









Screen-Shot-2016-06-08-at-8.50.33-PM-e1490568464150.png


Hot dogs or pizza tonight?



http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/27/podesta-group-subpoenaed-in-russia-probe/
 
And when it is all said and done, after the conservatives have interjected all their Hillary conspiracies, regurgitated last Century's conspiracies, and express their hopes of irrelevancy, the beat still goes on, KremlinGate just keeps on growing
 
archives said:
And when it is all said and done, after the conservatives have interjected all their Hillary conspiracies, regurgitated last Century's conspiracies, and express their hopes of irrelevancy, the beat still goes on, KremlinGate just keeps on growing
Click to expand...

But the only reason it's "growing", is because it's being watered by liberal snowflake's tears. :D
 
archives said:
"Sen. Richard Blumenthal said Thursday there are “gaps” in Donald Trump Jr.’s closed-door testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, and that he expects President Donald Trump's son to return for a public hearing before the panel"

"President Donald Trump’s eldest son told the judiciary panel that he accepted the meeting — which was billed as a chance to get dirt on Hillary Clinton — because he wanted to learn about Clinton’s “fitness” for the presidency. He said in his opening statement that nothing ever came of the meeting, but that he would have sought legal counsel before using any damaging information provided by the Kremlin-linked lawyer, Natalia Veselnitskaya."

http://www.politico.com/story/2017/...-testimony-richard-blumenthal-242450?lo=ap_a1

Difficult to determine which is the most absurd;

"... he accepted the meeting because he wanted to learn about Clinton's fitness for the presidency," or, "he would have sought legal counsel before using any damaging information provided by the Kremlin-linked lawyer"

Tell me the White House wouldn't be shitting their pants if Donald had to appear before a televised public hearing, they ain't Hannity
Click to expand...

:rofl2: He wanted to learn about Hillary's fitness from a Russian? I swear stupidity runs in the genes in that family.
 
christiefan915 said:
:rofl2: He wanted to learn about Hillary's fitness from a Russian? I swear stupidity runs in the genes in that family.
Click to expand...

Just a PC way of saying he was looking for dirt on hrc.
Speaking of dirt, here's the dirty: Jr. was there to see if the Russians had some hacked emails she and/or her campaign didn't want anyone to see that could be used against her. Apparently they didn't or weren't willing to give it to Jr. . Can we at least all agree on that?
 
Darth Omar said:
What was Goldstone up to, and who put him up to conning Junior into a fake meeting about Russian dirt on Hillary? That's the million dollar question.

What is Goldstone's link to Fusion GPS?

The problem for the Collusion Seekers is that 'collusion' is a verb that denotes some kind of team work to accomplish an objective. But since the Russians had no dirt on Hillary, there can be, by definition, no collusion.

Moreover, I'm not convinced using foreign nationals for opposition research is illegal, to begin with. Didn't the Piss Dossier originate with a foreign national?

Oh wait, that's different lol.
Click to expand...

As soon as the meeting occurred, regardless of the content or outcome, the law was violated. The word is "solicit" and that's exactly what Jr did.
 
"No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent.
 
domer76 said:
"No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent.
Click to expand...
Now where did you see that?
 
domer76 said:
"No person shall knowingly solicit, accept or receive from a foreign national any contribution or donation," reads Title 11 in the Code of Federal Regulations, section 110.20 (g). A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent.
Click to expand...

"A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent."

And yet here we have an example of liberal snowflakes attempting to rewrite the meaning of a word or phrase. :palm:
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
"A contribution can be "anything of value," including negative information about a political opponent."

And yet here we have an example of liberal snowflakes attempting to rewrite the meaning of a word or phrase. :palm:
Click to expand...

Wrong again, idiot. 11 CFR 300.2

Read it and weep, loser.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top