6.5 m social security numbers linked to those age 112 and up

I worked as a temp at Woodlawn. Md. ( Bureau of Disability) back in the lat 1970s
Believe me they have the resources..
Maybe if the bureaucrats actually didn't accrue annual leave at such an alarming rate.

I dunno what they are doing.. I know many state workers, county etc...

An X-inlaw works for the welfare depart as a case worker.... His case load is about 4 times more than it was ten years ago....

I talked to him many hours about it & he/they are just overwhelmed....

There is no time for followups & if they suspect fraud or even if it is reported/tips there is no one to look into it/investigate...

I saw on facebook last week someone(friend of an acquaintance) posting they don't drink their WIC milk, does anyone want it.... & another replied that she doesn't want hers either & they can have her milk as well...

Seems they could prob save a lot of money by spending a little....
 
Maybe, especially if they will work for free..:rolleyes:

Wouldn't have helped, silly Billy.

Documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request show that the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS) abandoned required background checks for Obama’s Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) directive, which grants illegal aliens a two-year deferment from deportation.

Acting on a tip from a whistleblower at a federal law enforcement agency, Judicial Watch filed a FOIA request with DHS, for “all communications, memoranda, emails, policy guidance, directives, initiatives, and any other correspondence respecting the scope and extent of background checks to be performed (or not) on aliens applying to the Obama administration’s DACA program.”

The FOIA was filed on October 26, 2012. The FOIA documents reveal a costly, haphazard process, with only cursory review for the backgrounds of illegal aliens seeking “deferred status.”

Document highlights include:

In a series of agency memos beginning in September 14, 2012, field offices were told to expect the National Benefits Center (which collects all DACA applications) to conduct only “lean & lite” background checks on illegal alien applicants, and that, henceforth, “NBC will not perform full TECS checks or any evidence review on these cases before we ship to the field.”

An October 14 memo reiterated that under the new “lean and lite” policy, “Hits will be sent to the field without resolution.”

An email chain from September 5 and through November 14 indicates managerial pressure not to turn any illegal alien applicant away for lack of ID, including the explicit directive in an October 3 memo, “Biometric processing should not be refused solely because an applicant does not present an acceptable ID.”

On November 9, 2012, just three days after Obama was reelected, in an “!!! IMPORTANT DACA MESSAGE!!! The agency was directed to: “Please put all DACA work on hold until further notice.”

There are no later-dated documents in the production to indicate if USCIS ever resumed DACA background checks.

The documents also reveal that, contrary to DHS Secretary Janet Napolitano’s claim that DACA applied only to minors who came to this country illegally “through no fault of their own,” the directive actually created a new avenue of chain migration, whereby immediate relatives of DACA requesters could be approved for amnesty.


http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/homeland-security-documents-reveal-dhs-abandoned-required-illegal-alien-background-checks-to-meet-flood-of-amnesty-requests-following-obamas-deferred-action-for-childhood-arrivals-directive/
 
Look at the NPR source:

http://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...security-numbers-linked-to-those-112-or-older

There are 6.5 million extant social security numbers that have yet to be retired. That doesn't mean all of them are drawing benefits. 4000 such numbers were used for everify over a period of 5 years. It doesn't mention any reports of anyone trying to draw benefits from the numbers, but there is one guy who tried to open bank accounts with them.
 
I dunno what they are doing.. I know many state workers, county etc...

An X-inlaw works for the welfare depart as a case worker.... His case load is about 4 times more than it was ten years ago....

I talked to him many hours about it & he/they are just overwhelmed....

There is no time for followups & if they suspect fraud or even if it is reported/tips there is no one to look into it/investigate...

I saw on facebook last week someone(friend of an acquaintance) posting they don't drink their WIC milk, does anyone want it.... & another replied that she doesn't want hers either & they can have her milk as well...

Seems they could prob save a lot of money by spending a little....

The answer is obviously to hire more people to handle these cases so that you would be more able to handle fraud. Of course rightists want to cut government employees, which hampers the governments ability to prosecute fraud. Then they whine about the fraud after the fact and use it as an excuse to kill the program.
 
Back
Top