Sessions praises eugenics racism

NOVA said:
81% of Dems voted FOR passage and 83% of Reps FOR passage in House
90% of Dems voted FOR passage and 87% of Reps FOR passage in Senate

Passed by what we would call a landslide by both parties....
It was just after the end of WWI and the world was a different place you fool
and still the #1 idiot on jpp......
Click to expand...

Granted, shit fer brains.
Now explain why Sessions admires it.
 
it was 1924


pretty stupid to try and blame the dead people for Sessions liking racism and saying it was good for America
 
Those damn Chinese laborers were stealing all those high pay big benny careers to the top building the railroads that white people wanted.

"The first Chinese were hired in 1865 [sic] at approximately $28 per month to do the very dangerous work of blasting and laying ties over the treacherous terrain of the high Sierras. They lived in simply dwellings and cooked their own meals, often consisting of fish, dried oysters and fruit, mushrooms and seaweed.

Work in the beginning was slow and difficult. After the first 23 miles, Ten Miles of Track Laid in One Day, April 28, 1869.Central Pacific faced the daunting task of laying tracks over terrain that rose 7,000 feet in 100 miles. To conquer the many sheer embankments, the Chinese workers used techniques they had learned in China to complete similar tasks. China Labour, CPRR Payroll, March, 1865They were lowered by ropes from the top of cliffs in baskets [sic], and while suspended, they chipped away at the granite and planted explosives that were used to blast tunnels. Many workers risked their lives and perished in the harsh winters and dangerous conditions."

http://cprr.org/Museum/Chinese.html
 
NOVA said:
81% of Dems voted FOR passage and 83% of Reps FOR passage in House
90% of Dems voted FOR passage and 87% of Reps FOR passage in Senate

Passed by what we would call a landslide by both parties....
It was just after the end of WWI and the world was a different place you fool
and still the #1 idiot on jpp......
Click to expand...

Then why is Sessions still supportive of it today?
 
Rune said:
Granted, shit fer brains.
Now explain why Sessions admires it.
Click to expand...
\

Because,

[FONT=&quot]“Low levels of immigration probably also made it easier to enact the great New Deal and Great Society social programs of the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, (all liberal supported programs) just as the existence of those programs today—welfare, health, state and federal support for higher education [/FONT][FONT=&quot](all liberal supported programs) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]—probably reinforces pressure to restrict immigration and drive out illegal aliens now.”


[/FONT]
 
christiefan915 said:
I wondered how long it would take someone to drop her name. Sanger's been dead for 50 years. What's Jeffy's excuse?
Click to expand...
She may be gone but her legacy continues...Of course you pinheads deny and lie about her quotes today.........Hillary loves her still.....what's her
excuse and the excuse of liberals in general....
 
NOVA said:
She may be gone but her legacy continues...Of course you pinheads deny and lie about her quotes today.........Hillary loves her still.....what's her
excuse and the excuse of liberals in general....
Click to expand...

Her legacy continues and people like Jeffy glommed right onto it. What's his excuse? And who cares what Hillary thinks, she's over and done.
 
NOVA said:
\

Because,

[FONT=&quot]“Low levels of immigration probably also made it easier to enact the great New Deal and Great Society social programs of the 1930s, 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, (all liberal supported programs) just as the existence of those programs today—welfare, health, state and federal support for higher education [/FONT][FONT=&quot](all liberal supported programs) [/FONT][FONT=&quot]—probably reinforces pressure to restrict immigration and drive out illegal aliens now.”


[/FONT]
Click to expand...

You are cookoo for coco puffs, chump.
 
evince said:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immigration_Act_of_1924



The Immigration Act of 1924, or Johnson–Reed Act, including the National Origins Act, and Asian Exclusion Act (Pub.L. 68–139, 43*Stat.*153, enacted May*26, 1924), was a United States federal law that limited the annual number of immigrants who could be admitted from any country to 2% of the number of people from that country who were already living in the United States as of the 1890 census, down from the 3% cap set by the Emergency Quota Act of 1921, which used the Census of 1910. The law was primarily aimed at further restricting immigration of Southern Europeans and Eastern Europeans, especially Italians and Eastern European Jews.[1][2][3] In addition, it severely restricted the immigration of Africans and outright banned the immigration of Arabs and Asians.
According to the U.S. Department of State Office of the Historian the purpose of the act was "to preserve the ideal of American homogeneity".[4] But though the Act aimed at preserving American racial homogeneity, it set no limits on immigration from other countries of the Americas.[5] Congressional opposition was minimal. According to Columbia University historian Mae Ngai, the 1924 Act put an end to a period where the United States essentially had open borders
Click to expand...

:rofl2:

Eugenics and Racism...huh.

:rofl2:
 
evince said:
it should nit need to be used


it has been always used.


that is why we designed a system to end it by balencing out the prejudice
Click to expand...

Institutionalized gov't RACISM sponsored by the Socialist Democrats :palm: Some things never change.
 
For the ignorant liberal propagandists that are lying to millenials ... "the 1924 Act put an end to a period where the United States essentially had open borders".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top