A question for JPP anti-Trump zealots

Indeed. They will never get over it. And will hold a grudge the entire presidency.

It's their own fault. Dirty Debbie Wasserman Schultz colluded with Crooked Hillary to cheat Bernie Sanders. That alienated a lot of people who might have voted for a better Democrat candidate.
 
Well - I figured you wouldn't be able to answer that, or discuss it intelligently.

No huge surprise there.

Communism was 'perverted' by Mao and Stalin.

That's fascinating, Thingy. Leaves me speechless, actually.

So, what is it in the economic theory of communism that leads to human misery?
 
And you're just a friggin' moron, Darth. You're well beyond your depth here.

We're talking about the actual ideologies - not the perversions that despots practice. Communism has nothing inherent that is about oppression, racism, anti-Semitism or inequality.

Nazism does. Do you get that? Is that very basic concept too much for you?

LOL.

All that proves is that Communist ideologues are sly hypocrites and liars, HOSS.

The net effects of Communist rule included oppression, racism, anti-Semitism and inequality on a staggering scale, and you think the Nazis were the moral inferiors of Commies because they didn't try to conceal it?

:rofl2:
 
LOL.

All that proves is that Communist ideologues are sly hypocrites and liars, HOSS.

The net effects of Communist rule included oppression, racism, anti-Semitism and inequality on a staggering scale, and you think the Nazis were the moral inferiors of Commies because they didn't try to conceal it?

:rofl2:

You ignored his statement when you responded, idiot. Ideology, not your take on net effects. Nazi stands for white supremacy and everything that naturally flows from that assumption, master race, et.al. You will not find that in Karl Marx / Engels.

Why you congenitally dishonest?
 
LOL.

All that proves is that Communist ideologues are sly hypocrites and liars, HOSS.

The net effects of Communist rule included oppression, racism, anti-Semitism and inequality on a staggering scale, and you think the Nazis were the moral inferiors of Commies because they didn't try to conceal it?

:rofl2:

This is actually pretty instructional lol.
 
And you're just a friggin' moron, Darth. You're well beyond your depth here.

We're talking about the actual ideologies - not the perversions that despots practice. Communism has nothing inherent that is about oppression, racism, anti-Semitism or inequality.

Nazism does. Do you get that? Is that very basic concept too much for you?

Wow, you've gone full blown commie.
 
This is actually pretty instructional lol.

The High Oracle of Situational Selectivity and his Faithful acolytes think the language in a manifesto makes a political ideology more evil than an evil political ideology in practice. :dunno:

They really seem to think they can convince us that Commies are the good guys because they weren't honest about what they would do when they seized power.

Must be the thin air on Mount Olympus where the High Oracle of Situational Selectivity abides in his Holy Temple above the clouds.

:rofl2:
 
Communism was 'perverted' by Mao and Stalin.

That's fascinating, Thingy. Leaves me speechless, actually.

So, what is it in the economic theory of communism that leads to human misery?

All you're saying is that if a dictator abuses power and causes misery for many, and also calls himself a "conservative," then conservatism is evil from that point on.

Again, there is nothing in communist theory to justify any of Stalin's actions. Stalin was a madman and a tyrant, and didn't practice "communism." He was about power.

I think communism is a bad theory, but it isn't evil on its own (not that you'll comprehend anything I'm writing here). It's just a theory that tries to address inequality, but I think it fails because it takes away incentive and competition. There is nothing in the theory about genocide, mass murder & oppression.

Nazism, on the other hand, preaches racial hierarchy, anti-Semitism and discrimination as core values. The evil that has been practiced in its name is actually inherent in the ideology.

Do you see the difference there? At all? I'm guessing not, but it's a fairly simple distinction.
 
Back
Top