NK's weaponization of North's "Hwasong-14" ICBM.
- Thread starter dukkha
- Start date
do you live in a cave? Howmany times has NK threatened to sink our
subs/ "annihilate" the USA etc? He now ( or shortly will have) has the ability to do so.
where did you pull that out of ? your hat or you butt?
Of course "i'm aware" - the QUESTION is how to best neutralize NK's assets should it come down to what looks
to be inevitable ;a NK state that can hit the US with a hydrogen bomb.
The greatest dangers are NK's artillery ( dug in) targeting Seoul, but there are assuredly wargames on how to best neutrazile that threat.
What is you position on NK if/when it get's a hydrogen bomb ICBM capable of reaching the US?
We can hope our AMB system can take it out, but that's a bet on a clear existential threat.
you call him out, you make it know "all options are on the table" ,and you play the situation as it unfolds
SK wanted to talk to NK ,and did not want the THAAD systems. There is a "2 track process"
Tillerson is talking up talks, while Mathis is looking at threats.
Trump is calling out SK for it's previous behaviours,but also there are trade talks going on (Free Trade Agreement)
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
do you live in a cave? Howmany times has NK threatened to sink our
subs/ "annihilate" the USA etc? He now ( or shortly will have) has the ability to do so.
where did you pull that out of ? your hat or you butt?
Of course "i'm aware" - the QUESTION is how to best neutralize NK's assets should it come down to what looks
to be inevitable ;a NK state that can hit the US with a hydrogen bomb.
The greatest dangers are NK's artillery ( dug in) targeting Seoul, but there are assuredly wargames on how to best neutrazile that threat.
What is you position on NK if/when it get's a hydrogen bomb ICBM capable of reaching the US?
We can hope our AMB system can take it out, but that's a bet on a clear existential threat.
you call him out, you make it know "all options are on the table" ,and you play the situation as it unfolds
:0) Are you in a cave right now waiting on NK to nuke the US .. because if you are, you are in fact and in deed an absolute moron without question, because that's never going to happen.
NK's nukes are there to prevent Kim from following Saddam and Gaddafi to the grave with a US bullet in his head.
I thought you claimed to be some kind of 'expert' on geopolitical politics. :0) Oh well.
cancel2 2022
Canceled
He has four generals ffs, stop being such an arsehole!
of course the idea is have to have nukes for MAD type Cold war protection/stalemate.
But with such belligerence - and it not just against the USA-
You have to look at them hitting the US/Japan/Guam etc.
Is lil Kim rational? do you want to bet a hydrogen bomb on that?
Mathis is now talking about :
"Any threat to U.S. or allies by North Korea “will be met with a massive military response”
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
I wouldn't bet a hydrogen bomb on your president .. and I find Kim more rational and trustworthy then your president.
good for you..move there for all i care
And talking about war pigs: Defense Secretary James Mattis warned North Korea Sunday against aggression against the United States or its allies, saying it would trigger a unified world response and what he termed the "total annihilation of a country, namely North Korea."
This is the biggest bunch of warmongers I have seen at least since Bush-Cheney. And at least I never felt like Bush was always on the verge of getting us into a nuclear war.
I see we have a lot of war pigs here banging the drums for war - not least of which, Noise/Annata!
good for Mattis. Japan and the US and perhaps S.Korea should indeed warn NK that an attack on the US or it's allies would be met with overwhelming and decisive force that would annihilate.
The question is will lil Kim take that seriously -is he a "rational state actor" or not
you idiot.
warning NK that an attack on the US or allies would be met with overwhelming force/destruction
is the EXACT SAME warning we used against the Soviet Union. the so called Mutual Assured Destruction.
For someone who despises Russia so much you sure don't understand the Cold War 1.
Orangetweet has no game to change.
blackascoal
The Force is With Me
You think Kim doesn't already know what the consequences would be?
Why do you think NK has never launched such an attack before? Do you think they were just waiting on Trump to know that? You think he hasn't been taking it seriously?
The truly irrational actor here is Trump .. and the world knows that.
Your choice of the word "idiot" is appropriate, but not in the way you think it is.
Real men, real leaders, and the Presidents of global super powers do not bluster on Twitter, do not issue threats on twitter, and do not berate and harangue allies on twitter. Even uber-conservative Ted Cruz is criticizing the way your Orange Clown is blustering.
We have diplomatic channels to do shit like that. Once you start blustering and bellowing on Twitter, you are going to be committed and you open yourself up to being weakling that makes empty threats. Speak softly and carry a big stick. Teddy Roosevelt, no?
I actually can't even remember the last time Putin threatened to annihilate a country on Twitter. But we both know Putin is about ten times more cunning than your hapless, flaccid, orange clown.
The Kim family drama has been handled like a relay race. Trump's predecessors have handed off that baton from one to the next and now it's up to Trump bring it across the finish line. Whatever happens, the blame is on Kim. Some of his own citizens may lose their lives because of him. If it comes down to them or us having the last word or action...I vote for us.
Exactly
Inapt. Of the four legs, the final is the best runner. In this case Trump is an intellectual cripple. He needs to get the fuck out of the way and do NOTHING and hand the baton off to someone else.
Q.how long has NK had an ICBM that can survive re-entry, carrying a miniaturized warhead and be guided in it's terminal phase to target?
A. like in the last 6 months? year maybe?
IOWs for all his blustering it's only now that he is an existential threat.
And his rhetoric is so jingoistic/warlike it HAS to be taken as such.
Like i've told you many times you don't understand- or you choose not to look at- how weapons systems impact abilities/geopolitics .
Cold War 2 is the classic example. You never seem to think there is ENOUGH tank division running around Poland.
You've laughed when I tell you the reason Russia has developed tactical battlefield nukes is to make up for force inferiority..
What happens when lil Kim can fire off a couple of these at the same time? will our 50-50 ABM system be able to intercept them all?