Phony media claim - More than 20 Texas representatives and senators voted against San

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
Here is why I call it the PHONY media. The PHONY headline:

More than 20 Texas representatives and senators voted against Sandy aid. How will they vote on Harvey?

The art of compromise, otherwise known as you-scratch-my-back-I’ll-scratch-yours, has all but disappeared from the halls of Congress in recent years. And that may put more than 20 members of the Texas congressional delegation in a bind when relief for the victims of Hurricane Harvey comes up for a vote.

The representatives, and Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, all voted against a $50.5-billion relief package for victims of 2012’s Superstorm Sandy when it came before them in January 2013. (The measure passed anyway.) Although the shape and size of a relief package for victims of Harvey won’t emerge for at least several months, it’s clear that a big one will be needed. Damage estimates from the storm still pummeling the Gulf Coast around Houston have reached $40 billion, and are likely to rise.


The real story: most voted against the massive amount of lard Democrats tried to throw into the relief effort. As is typical with liberal liars, it's all about the corrupt political class trying to BUY the votes of the idiots who swallow their swill.

Most of the lawmakers who commented on the 2013 Sandy appropriation couched their opposition in terms of fiscal responsibility. The issue, they said, was that the Sandy bill had been larded down with non-Sandy and non-emergency spending. “Emergency relief for the families who are suffering from this natural disaster should not be used as a Christmas tree for billions in unrelated spending," Cruz said then.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-harvey-aid-sandy-vote-20170828-story.html
 
Here is why I call it the PHONY media. The PHONY headline:

More than 20 Texas representatives and senators voted against Sandy aid. How will they vote on Harvey?

The art of compromise, otherwise known as you-scratch-my-back-I’ll-scratch-yours, has all but disappeared from the halls of Congress in recent years. And that may put more than 20 members of the Texas congressional delegation in a bind when relief for the victims of Hurricane Harvey comes up for a vote.

The representatives, and Republican Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn, all voted against a $50.5-billion relief package for victims of 2012’s Superstorm Sandy when it came before them in January 2013. (The measure passed anyway.) Although the shape and size of a relief package for victims of Harvey won’t emerge for at least several months, it’s clear that a big one will be needed. Damage estimates from the storm still pummeling the Gulf Coast around Houston have reached $40 billion, and are likely to rise.


The real story: most voted against the massive amount of lard Democrats tried to throw into the relief effort. As is typical with liberal liars, it's all about the corrupt political class trying to BUY the votes of the idiots who swallow their swill.

Most of the lawmakers who commented on the 2013 Sandy appropriation couched their opposition in terms of fiscal responsibility. The issue, they said, was that the Sandy bill had been larded down with non-Sandy and non-emergency spending. “Emergency relief for the families who are suffering from this natural disaster should not be used as a Christmas tree for billions in unrelated spending," Cruz said then.

http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-harvey-aid-sandy-vote-20170828-story.html

You got any actual facts to back up your ":real story"?

I'll be waiting...
 
You got any actual facts to back up your ":real story"?

I'll be waiting...

wait no more zappacrite


24 billion dollars of the allocated funds weren’t expected to be spent until 2016 or after. The hurricane, for reference, was in 2012. According to CBO, nearly 4 billion of the spending in that bill didn’t even pretend to be for emergencies: 3.459 billion was actually designated as non-emergency spending.

The bill itself is here: https://www.congress.gov/113/plaws/publ2/PLAW-113publ2.pdf

Here's the CBO finding: https://www.cbo.gov/sites/default/files/summarydrappropact2013-hr152-passedhouse00.pdf

Here are some things you will find if you read all of these (you won't), including specific spending in the Sandy relief bill that has nothing to do with emergency needs or disaster relief:

16,000,000,000 dollars for Community Development Block Grants (11 billion higher than HUD was requesting at the time)
600,000,000 for State and Tribal Assistance Grants under the EPA
348,000,000 for “construction” for the National Park Service
100,000,000 for Head Start
50,000,000 for the Historic Preservation Fund at the NPS
45,000,000 for upgrades to NOAA aircraft
22,000,000 for upgrading NOAA weather equipment
50,000,000 for “construction” for Fish and Wildlife Services
24,000,000 for the Defense Working Capital Fund
10,000,000 to Small Business Administration to plus up grants to organizations seeking to participate in disaster relief
4,400,000 for “capital improvement” to the Forestry Service
3,000,000 for oil spill research
2,000,000 for the Smithsonian’s famously leaky roofs.
1,000,000 for new cars for the DEA.
1,000,000 to the Legal Services Corporation.

http://thefederalist.com/2017/08/31/sandy-relief-bill-chock-full-pork/

i'm still waiting 4 "actual facts" to back up your stories zappacrite.

where iz ur proof that russell walker iz a trumpkin Z u claimed?

where iz ur proof that pastor osteen sed hiz building wuz flooded az u claimed?


:dunno:
 
Back
Top