Steele dossier is discredited as fake.
Nope, it has largely been substantiated, and only Putin and Trump know if prostitutes pissed on him.
Steele dossier is discredited as fake.
They're not fake prostitutes if Putin has the whole thing recorded, which is actually his modus operandi -- to lure wealthy business men with prostitutes into morally compromising positions, record the encounter, and hold the recordings as blackmail.
Dude, if there was an actual video of Trump watching Russian prostitutes urinating

Lets face it, Trump will see jail time before Clinton.

These individuals had intimate and personal knowledge relating to Secretary Clinton's
non-government server, including helping her build and administer the device. Yet, it appears
that the following key FBI interviews had not yet occurred when Mr. Corney began drafting his
exoneration statement:
1. May 3, 2016 - Paul Combetta
2. May 12, 2016- Sean Misko
3. May 17, 2016- Unnamed CIAemployee
4. May 19, 2016- Unnamed CIAemployee
5. May 24, 2016 - Heather Samuelson
6. May 26, 2016 - Marcel Lehel (akaGuccifer)
7. May 28, 2016 - Cheryl Mills
8. June 3, 2016- Charlie Wisecarver
9. June 10, 2016 - John Bentel
10. June 15, 2016 - Lewis Lukens
11. June 21, 2016 - Justin Cooper
12. June 21, 2016- Unnamed StateDept. Employee
13. June 21, 2016 - Bryan Pagliano
14. June 21, 2016 - Purcell Lee
15. June 23, 2016-Monica Hanley
16. June 29, 2016 - Hannah Richert
17. July 2, 2016 - Hillary Clinton
^ooh I forgot about all that! what a bunch of shysters
++
Obama’s Used Pseudonym to Email Clinton
http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...alias-clinton-why-fbi-didnt-prosecute-hillary
Again, this is why the prosecution of Mrs. Clinton never had a chance of happening.
It also explains why, in his public statements about the matter, Obama insisted that Clinton’s e-mailing of classified information did not harm national security.
It is why Obama, in stark contrast to his aforementioned executive order, made public statements pooh-poohing the fact that federal law forbids the mishandling of any intelligence secret. (“There’s classified, and then there’s classified,” he said, so cavalierly.) He had to take this position because he had himself effectively endorsed the practice of high-level communications through non-secure channels.
~~
Abedin knew an insurance policy when she saw one. If Obama himself had been e-mailing over a non-government, non-secure system, then everyone else who had been doing it had a get-out-of-jail-free card.
The FBI records that the next thing Abedin did, after “express[ing] her amazement at the president’s use of a pseudonym,” was to “ask if she could have a copy of the email.”
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/artic...alias-clinton-why-fbi-didnt-prosecute-hillary
Eggggzzzzzzzzactly! And an expensive pack of shysters at that.
You have to wonder about Mueller at this point.
He likely has a degree of allegiance to the Deep State so he would like to nail Trump. But he's finding out there's not a whole lot of 'there, there'. Manafort may be fruitful, but he's too peripheral an actor. If you can believe the anonymous sources [always a dubious proposition] Mueller is looking into Trump's non-election related finances.
Which goes beyond his mandate. If Mueller is *forced* to go beyond his mandate and risk compromising his own investigation, then you almost have to assume it was done out of necessity---because there simply is no Russian collusion.
But then, Mueller sees all of this patently obvious corruption on the democrat side, with Hillary, with the unmasking under Obama, former AG Lynch meeting Bill Clinton on the tarmac---his buddy Comey exonerating Hillary under a nonsensical legal justification. Wasserman's IT guy Awan, stealing data from congress and selling it to the highest bidder...and on and on.
So on Muller's right hand sits the Nothing Burger of Trump/Russia. And on his other hand sits a 16 oz. Prime Rib of democrat corruption.
Does he play along with the Deep State even if it means ruining his reputation? Or does he go for the Prime Rib?
Lets face it, Trump will see jail time before Clinton.
The books were cooked a long time ago. Hillary was never going to be indicted. It was in June of last year I think where Hillary said there was "zero chance" of any indictment."
Her first witness as a defendant in a criminal case would be the President of the United States. Why? Because Hillary Clinton emailed President Barack Obama. He knew she had a private email server.
She said publicly that "everyone" in Washington knew she was using a private email. Translation? Mr. President, this ain't happening because you're my first witness.
And, in February, 2016 ... "I am 100 percent confident nothing will come from the review of my email account," Clinton told MSNBC's Chuck Todd during the fifth Democratic presidential debate.
And, it all kind of makes sense. It was up to Hillary to keep the Obama legacy going. She believed her victory was inevitable. So between falling down and having coughing fits or resting from falling down and having coughing fits, Obama went out on the stump for her. Evidently the coat tails weren't long enough and the rest is history.
Maybe you can list for us the exact instances of corruption in the Obama administration? Don't let your political motivation get in the way of actual facts.
When did that happen?