Pelosi on violent Antifa members: Lock them up

Thing1 said:
Holy shite, man.

Where did I say violent protests by lefties "should be excused?" Please be specific - I want to see the exact verbiage.

Do you know what a "goalpost move" is? It's you stating that "rabid lefties out number their rightwing counterparts by a wide margin," and then backing that up with nothing except "look at the TV," and then when I call you on that falsely asserting that I'm "excusing violent protests."

What a mess. Get yourself together, and STAY ON TOPIC.
Click to expand...

The topic is the magnitude of violence, left vs right. You're the one obfuscating on it.

Since no one has any numbers, we can only go by observation. Are you still with me?

Based on observation, that the left has a bigger problem with violence than the right. It goes back to at least Ferguson. Those were lefties out in the streets. It continued on to Berkeley where Milo caused the leftist crazies to come out of the woodwork and burn the campus. Though the one woman was killed by Nazis in Charlottesville, the rest of the violence was a draw and Trump was *correct* in calling both sides out on it.

Now, Pelosi was forced *by observation* to prove Trump right and call out Antifa for violence. And you know what else? She gets the same treatment the media gave to Trump.

Until Pelosi and the rest denounce Antifa, by name, she and the democrat party are coddling fascists. Because that's what Antifa are, fasicst thugs.

How's that?
 
Darth Omar said:
The topic is the magnitude of violence, left vs right. You're the one obfuscating on it.

Since no one has any numbers, we can only go by observation. Are you still with me?

Based on observation, that the left has a bigger problem with violence than the right. It goes back to at least Ferguson. Those were lefties out in the streets. It continued on to Berkeley where Milo caused the leftist crazies to come out of the woodwork and burn the campus. Though the one woman was killed by Nazis in Charlottesville, the rest of the violence was a draw and Trump was *correct* in calling both sides out on it.

Now, Pelosi was forced *by observation* to prove Trump right and call out Antifa for violence. And you know what else? She gets the same treatment the media gave to Trump.

Until Pelosi and the rest denounce Antifa, by name, she and the democrat party are coddling fascists. Because that's what Antifa are, fasicst thugs.

How's that?
Click to expand...

Oh, the rest of the left will end up denouncing them; because it's going to be damage control.
The left are finally coming to the realization that antifa is seen as being part of the left and are disgusted by the behavior of antifa.
 
Darth Omar said:
The topic is the magnitude of violence, left vs right. You're the one obfuscating on it.

Since no one has any numbers, we can only go by observation. Are you still with me?

Based on observation, that the left has a bigger problem with violence than the right. It goes back to at least Ferguson. Those were lefties out in the streets. It continued on to Berkeley where Milo caused the leftist crazies to come out of the woodwork and burn the campus. Though the one woman was killed by Nazis in Charlottesville, the rest of the violence was a draw and Trump was *correct* in calling both sides out on it.

Now, Pelosi was forced *by observation* to prove Trump right and call out Antifa for violence. And you know what else? She gets the same treatment the media gave to Trump.

Until Pelosi and the rest denounce Antifa, by name, she and the democrat party are coddling fascists. Because that's what Antifa are, fasicst thugs.

How's that?
Click to expand...

This is what you said, and what I was responding to:

""The rabid far lefties out number their rightwing counterparts by a wide margin."

That's #'s - not magnitude of violence.

Are you still with me?
 
Thing1 said:
This is what you said, and what I was responding to:

""The rabid far lefties out number their rightwing counterparts by a wide margin."

That's #'s - not magnitude of violence.

Are you still with me?
Click to expand...

So, since no one has any accurate numbers that means it's impossible to draw any provisional conclusions? I offered my conclusion but you keep hiding behind the fact there's no numbers to reference.

Instead of trying to refute it. And from that I conclude you can't refute it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top