Forensic Expert Confirms; Heather Heyer Was NOT Murdered

Corazón said:
There was apparently a forensic report that stated that her death was not consistent with vehicular homicide. It is perplexing that multiple people took direct blows from the primary vehicle and yet survived. Maybe her obesity had some part to play in her demise?
Click to expand...

Apparently? Then where is it?
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
There is now another theory being presented (surprisingly) and that this may have been a staged "accident" that went horribly wrong.

But if the jury has any doubts as to his guilt (which could be what was intended all along), then who do you think is going to have the most angst and who's going to use this as a focus point for more counter protests?

I'm willing to wait to see everything that's presented; but it seems as if there are either photo shots or a film, from across the street and higher up, and I would like to see all of them, rather then just a few frames or photos.
Click to expand...

mayb the suspect will commit suicide arkanicide in jail :dunno:
 
I condemn racists & Nazis said:
the trial already took place on cnn & msnbc didnt it? :dunno:
Click to expand...

21034549_1478513518862128_1855928223607042604_n.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Kangaroo court.-2.jpg
    Kangaroo court.-2.jpg
    60 KB · Views: 2
  • Kangaroo court.jpg
    Kangaroo court.jpg
    40.9 KB · Views: 1
I'm not sure how this thread has got to 26 pages given that the original article was, quite obviously, clickbait.

I mean, after a headline declaring 'Forensic Expert Confirms; Heather Heyer Was NOT Murdered', you'd expect to hear some sort of evidence, no?

What you get is:-

1. A chap who prefers, for whatever reason, to remain anonymous.

2. A chap who imputs a disclaimer which states -
“To make a disclaimer, I am not 100% sure about the Heyer case and the innocence of James Fields. There are aspects of her death that can’t be well understood from pictures. Numerous details have yet to be ironed out, making it difficult to ascertain an exact portrait of the event: that is…what happened immediately before, during, and after Heyer was struck by the vehicle.
Click to expand...

So, he hasn't got a clue what happened before, during or after the period when the victim was struck by the vehicle. Some people might conclude that that disclaimer was enough to call into question everything that this chap proceded to write.

Luckily, we have a board full of forensic experts skilled in extrapolating findings from youtube videos, so, rather than leaving it in the hands of the investigative authorities, who have access to actual evidence, eyewitness statements, the suspect, the vehicle involved, etc., we have a verdict of our own which either involves clearing the driver of the car completely or blaming the victim for her own death and denigrating her for the temerity to be slightly overweight in one of the unhealthiest countries in the world.

Well done everyone.
 
charver said:
Shouldn't you be concentrating on your shit spelling schtick?
Click to expand...

Sometimes he slips up and I recognize his old persona I learned so well from before.
He doesn't think I do, but it is unavoidable with so many posts...

It's all just a big fucking game, isn't it...
 
charver said:
Shouldn't you be concentrating on your shit spelling schtick?
Click to expand...

You and the folks who "liked" your post just got pwned on this. He's been making fun of Desh for several days- none of you libtards ever chastise her for shitty spelling, poor sentence structure, grammatical errors...
 
Right said:
Prove it.
Click to expand...

Prove that I've seen plenty of charlatans posing as experts? Sorry, you fucking moron, I have no need to provide you my curriculum vitae.

Prove that this "expert" is one? His words speak for him.

Prove that you are? lol Your posts speak for themselves. You fail to even recognize this idiot as one.

In most courts, do you know what an expert is? Anybody that is an expert bullshit artist. Or from out of town.
 
Last edited:
domer76 said:
Prove that I've seen plenty of charlatans posing as experts? Sorry, you fucking moron, I have no need to provide you my curriculum vitae.

Prove that this "expert" is one? His works speak for him.

Prove that you are? lol Your posts speak for themselves. You fail to even recognize this idiot as one.

In most courts, do you know what an expert is? Anybody that is an expert bullshit artist. Or from out of town.
Click to expand...

The opposition side is free to question the validity of an expert. I'm not surprised that you didn't know that.
 
Right said:
The opposition side is free to question the validity of an expert. I'm not surprised that you didn't know that.
Click to expand...

I'm very well aware of it. Refer back to charlatans. And bullshitters.

The bar for qualifying as an expert is not that high.
 
Right said:
The opposition side is free to question the validity of an expert. I'm not surprised that you didn't know that.
Click to expand...

The left will accept "reports" from anonymous sources, when it comes to anything said about Trump; but when something is presented by an in-named source, that goes against their feels, they get triggered and refuse to consider it.

I believe that's called HYPOCRISY. :good4u:
 
Nomad said:
Anyone (Corazón & co) who is fucking stupid enough to believe that intentionally ramming a car into a crowd of people which resulted in death is not murder..... what else can be said?

You are beyond hope of redemption or ever achieving a normal level of adult human intelligence.

Go watch TV and play your video games. Leave the discussion of issues to the adults.
Click to expand...
I am saying that you don't know what really happened, but that won't stop you anyway as you have a bloodlust and a need for a scapegoat. It makes you wonder why you even have a court system when you've already decided the result.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top