Reporters at Trump rallies have more courage than he ever will

Funny you LEFTIES TAKE NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR WHERE THE
GOVERNMENT IS AT THIS TIME
.THE PARTY OF NO .

Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk
 
Superfreak said:
You realize who Mueller has put on his team, right?

Also, you find a link to back up your '150,000 reporters' yet?
Click to expand...

Hey...it's the Freak!

Democrats didn't even know about this investigation for months. Sorry.

And for 150,000 reporters, it was literally the 1st thing that came up on a google search. No idea how accurate it is, but it sounded close enough. Would "10's of thousands" have worked better for you? I'm trying to get inside the Trump apologist mind so I can communicate better with you & the rest.
 
Thing1 said:
Hey...it's the Freak!

Democrats didn't even know about this investigation for months. Sorry.

And for 150,000 reporters, it was literally the 1st thing that came up on a google search. No idea how accurate it is, but it sounded close enough. Would "10's of thousands" have worked better for you? I'm trying to get inside the Trump apologist mind so I can communicate better with you & the rest.
Click to expand...

Democrats didn't know? LMAO

So because I question your number (and provided you a link with an answer), somehow I am a Trump apologist? TDS is strong with you.
 
anatta said:
Trump the Assassin
Click to expand...

Roger Stone:

One of Donald Trump's closest advisers has warned a bloody civil war would erupt if the US President was impeached. Roger Stone predicted "an insurrection like you've never seen" if politicians sought to remove the US leader from the White House and claimed any politician who voted to topple him "would be endangering their own life".

...Mr Stone, a long-time Trump confidant and former official in Richard Nixon's administration, suggested impeachment proceedings would lead to an armed uprising among the President's supporters.

"Try to impeach him, just try it. You will have a spasm of violence in this country, an insurrection like you’ve never seen," he told entertainment website, TMZ. "The people will not stand for impeachment. A politician that votes for it would be endangering their own life."

Asked if he believed there would be "some sort of civil war" if the President was impeached, he replied: "Yes, that's what I think will happen.

"Both sides are heavily armed... There would be violence on both sides."

The Republican strategist and self-proclaimed "dirty trickster" claimed he was "not advocating violence" but "predicting it".

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-adviser-roger-stone-warns-091246640.html
 
Superfreak said:
Democrats didn't know? LMAO

So because I question your number (and provided you a link with an answer), somehow I am a Trump apologist? TDS is strong with you.
Click to expand...

No, Freak - if you look at the history, they were actually ticked when they found out about it. They were upset that the FBI was calling so much attention to Hillary's investigation, and that Trump also had an investigation going on which no one knew about.

So, yeah - they didn't know. Says a lot that you didn't realize that.
 
Thing1 said:
No, Freak - if you look at the history, they were actually ticked when they found out about it. They were upset that the FBI was calling so much attention to Hillary's investigation, and that Trump also had an investigation going on which no one knew about.

So, yeah - they didn't know. Says a lot that you didn't realize that.
Click to expand...

LOL... so you went from 'they aren't running it' to 'they didn't know about it a year ago'??? The entire collusion thing has been ongoing for about a year now. To date, what evidence of collusion is there? Yet the media still harps on it.

The only thing I didn't realize is that you were talking about a YEAR ago. I forgot I wasn't talking with a rational person. Rational people when talking about a current investigation by Mueller don't reference back to the original FBI investigation a year ago. They most certainly don't pretend the Dems or their lackeys don't currently have any input in the running of the investigation.
 
Superfreak said:
LOL... so you went from 'they aren't running it' to 'they didn't know about it a year ago'??? The entire collusion thing has been ongoing for about a year now. To date, what evidence of collusion is there? Yet the media still harps on it.

The only thing I didn't realize is that you were talking about a YEAR ago. I forgot I wasn't talking with a rational person. Rational people when talking about a current investigation by Mueller don't reference back to the original FBI investigation a year ago. They most certainly don't pretend the Dems or their lackeys don't currently have any input in the running of the investigation.
Click to expand...

You realize that the 2 things you're comparing in the bolded are consistent, right?

It's like saying, "so, you want from believing the world was round, to believing it wasn't flat"....
 
christiefan915 said:
Roger Stone:

One of Donald Trump's closest advisers has warned a bloody civil war would erupt if the US President was impeached. Roger Stone predicted "an insurrection like you've never seen" if politicians sought to remove the US leader from the White House and claimed any politician who voted to topple him "would be endangering their own life".

...Mr Stone, a long-time Trump confidant and former official in Richard Nixon's administration, suggested impeachment proceedings would lead to an armed uprising among the President's supporters.

"Try to impeach him, just try it. You will have a spasm of violence in this country, an insurrection like you’ve never seen," he told entertainment website, TMZ. "The people will not stand for impeachment. A politician that votes for it would be endangering their own life."

Asked if he believed there would be "some sort of civil war" if the President was impeached, he replied: "Yes, that's what I think will happen.

"Both sides are heavily armed... There would be violence on both sides."

The Republican strategist and self-proclaimed "dirty trickster" claimed he was "not advocating violence" but "predicting it".

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-adviser-roger-stone-warns-091246640.html
Click to expand...
I never heard of him..he's an idiot.
 
Thing1 said:
You realize that the 2 things you're comparing in the bolded are consistent, right?

It's like saying, "so, you want from believing the world was round, to believing it wasn't flat"....
Click to expand...

Um... sorry, but no. They are not consistent. One discusses who is running the investigation now. The other talks about what Dems knew a year ago.
 
Superfreak said:
Um... sorry, but no. They are not consistent. One discusses who is running the investigation now. The other talks about what Dems knew a year ago.
Click to expand...

The Democrats aren't "running the investigation."

And it's a Trump-created myth that the media is "harping on collusion." They talk about Russia a LOT, but usually in terms of new developments. I haven't heard the word "collusion" mentioned on the actual news at all (talk panels are a different story, but those are opinion shows - sorry).

And why do you guys keep calling for evidence? Do you think it's standard operating procedure for investigative bodies to release evidence as it arises?
 
Thing1 said:
The Democrats aren't "running the investigation."

And it's a Trump-created myth that the media is "harping on collusion." They talk about Russia a LOT, but usually in terms of new developments. I haven't heard the word "collusion" mentioned on the actual news at all (talk panels are a different story, but those are opinion shows - sorry).

And why do you guys keep calling for evidence? Do you think it's standard operating procedure for investigative bodies to release evidence as it arises?
Click to expand...

LMAO... new developments in Russia? You have to be kidding. They haven't been saying collusion? You sure about that Thing? Not in the WP, the NY Times etc...???
 
Thing1 said:
The Democrats aren't "running the investigation."

And it's a Trump-created myth that the media is "harping on collusion." They talk about Russia a LOT, but usually in terms of new developments. I haven't heard the word "collusion" mentioned on the actual news at all (talk panels are a different story, but those are opinion shows - sorry).

And why do you guys keep calling for evidence? Do you think it's standard operating procedure for investigative bodies to release evidence as it arises?
Click to expand...

Republicans will convict Trump...
That is the best part about it...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top