The Polls in the 2016 election were ACCURATE

Literal Vampire Potbelly Goblin said:
I remember specifically telling you that if the national polls were under 3% than a whole host of possabilities of trump winning were on the table and you were having none of it. I love it now that liberal polling chumps like you all of a sudden think you are experts, given how stupid you were last year on the matter. November 5th you still said it was impossible for trump to win. The internet does not forget.
Click to expand...

Are you really attempting to talk down to me after the past 6 months+ of swallowing everything Trump is feeding you whole and being one of his most ardent apologists?

How marvelous.
 
Jarod said:
People on the Right keep saying they were not accurate as justification for saying they are not currently accurate.
Click to expand...

They were not accurate no matter how much you want to believe. The bias was documented. Fivethirtyeight has a list of the bias scores if you google it.
 
aloysious said:
OK. I thought most on the right considered them accurate. They were as surprised as everybody else.
Click to expand...
I don't recall ever saying anything other than that Trump would beat Hilliary......I even remember every board liberal trying to remind me of my belief that Michigan would note vote for Obama over Romney to belittle my prediction.......
 
Thing1 said:
Are you really attempting to talk down to me after the past 6 months+ of swallowing everything Trump is feeding you whole and being one of his most ardent apologists?
Click to expand...

of course we are talking down to you.......your post shows you are still as stupid as you were in November.....
 
the problem is that demmycrats still haven't learned how to campaign under the electoral college........national polls are a waste of time......3 million extra voters in California are as valuable as the bullshit demmycrats spread........
 
Had the polls danced between the extremes of error and showed Trump ahead at some point, it would be reasonable to say that polls were accurate, but the polls consistently showed a bias towards Clinton and the media didn't hesitate to claim it as factual. There are countless examples and CNN even ran a special about it featuring Fareek admitting his bias.

please learn some statistics, Jarod.
 
tinfoil said:
They were not accurate no matter how much you want to believe. The bias was documented. Fivethirtyeight has a list of the bias scores if you google it.
Click to expand...
Please provide, I couldn't find it, thanks, because even fivethirtyeight showed her to lead, were they biased as well?
 
Jarod said:
Despite popular opinion, the polling numbers, almost all came in within the Margin of Error.

There was some dramatic shifting in the week before the vote, but if you take the election day numbers they almost all were within the Margin of Error...
Click to expand...

Ask the Young Turks today, if Hillary Clinton had a 98% chance of winning.
She has always been a LOSER and anyone that follows her values.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
I don't recall ever saying anything other than that Trump would beat Hilliary......I even remember every board liberal trying to remind me of my belief that Michigan would note vote for Obama over Romney to belittle my prediction.......
Click to expand...
Good for you. I said 'most'. I had already prepared myself for a total media blackout so I wouldn't have to see or hear hrc for the nexr four yrs.
 
Tarpon said:
So the polls that said Donald Trump had a zero percent chance of victory were correct.

Time to take your pills kid
Click to expand...

yeap


they were not taking into consideration the russian cheating for the republican party


how could polls reflect that idiot?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top