Getting scary now, attempting to shut down criticism, taking names,

A

archives

Verified User
"US government demands details on all visitors to anti-Trump protest website"

"The US government is seeking to unmask every person who visited an anti-Trump website in what privacy advocates say is an unconstitutional “fishing expedition” for political dissidents."

"On 17 July, the DoJ served a website-hosting company, DreamHost, with a search warrant for every piece of information it possessed that was related to a website that was used to coordinate protests during Donald Trump’s inauguration. The warrant covers the people who own and operate the site, but also seeks to get the IP addresses of 1.3 million people who visited it, as well as the date and time of their visit and information about what browser or operating system they used."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...tion-protest-website-search-warrant-dreamhost

Now how does all the conservative who endlessly tells about their Constitutional rights, love of the Constitution, and "freedom," defend this action?
 
archives said:
"US government demands details on all visitors to anti-Trump protest website"

"The US government is seeking to unmask every person who visited an anti-Trump website in what privacy advocates say is an unconstitutional “fishing expedition” for political dissidents."

"On 17 July, the DoJ served a website-hosting company, DreamHost, with a search warrant for every piece of information it possessed that was related to a website that was used to coordinate protests during Donald Trump’s inauguration. The warrant covers the people who own and operate the site, but also seeks to get the IP addresses of 1.3 million people who visited it, as well as the date and time of their visit and information about what browser or operating system they used."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...tion-protest-website-search-warrant-dreamhost

Now how does all the conservative who endlessly tells about their Constitutional rights, love of the Constitution, and "freedom," defend this action?
Click to expand...
They were warned of white nationalist, what have they done about them?
 
Nomad said:
Trump wants to turn any info he digs up over to his boss, Putin.
Click to expand...

Another one of your brilliant thoughts?

tell me, do you have people feeding you these or are they all yours?
That's a serious question, I'm trying to get a gauge on your process. because this is classic you, the little cartoon pics in your signature, off the wall remarks conflating Putin into a subject where he has no bearing,
agitating, borderline schizophrenia behavoir
 
Getin the ring said:
Another one of your brilliant thoughts?

tell me, do you have people feeding you these or are they all yours?
That's a serious question, I'm trying to get a gauge on your process. because this is classic you, the little cartoon pics in your signature, off the wall remarks conflating Putin into a subject where he has no bearing,
agitating, borderline schizophrenia behavoir
Click to expand...

The Derangement is strong in that one.

Help needs he.
 
archives said:
"US government demands details on all visitors to anti-Trump protest website"

"The US government is seeking to unmask every person who visited an anti-Trump website in what privacy advocates say is an unconstitutional “fishing expedition” for political dissidents."

"On 17 July, the DoJ served a website-hosting company, DreamHost, with a search warrant for every piece of information it possessed that was related to a website that was used to coordinate protests during Donald Trump’s inauguration. The warrant covers the people who own and operate the site, but also seeks to get the IP addresses of 1.3 million people who visited it, as well as the date and time of their visit and information about what browser or operating system they used."

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...tion-protest-website-search-warrant-dreamhost

Now how does all the conservative who endlessly tells about their Constitutional rights, love of the Constitution, and "freedom," defend this action?
Click to expand...

If you have nothing to hide then don't worry.
 
Getin the ring said:
Another one of your brilliant thoughts?

tell me, do you have people feeding you these or are they all yours?
That's a serious question, I'm trying to get a gauge on your process. because this is classic you, the little cartoon pics in your signature, off the wall remarks conflating Putin into a subject where he has no bearing,
agitating, borderline schizophrenia behavoir
Click to expand...

CRY HARDER, SNOWFLAKE!!!!

Darth Omar said:
The Derangement is strong in that one.

Help needs he.
Click to expand...

CRY HARDER, SNOWFLAKE!!!!
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
If you have nothing to hide then don't worry.
Click to expand...

"If you have nothing to hide then don't worry," seriously?

So your endorsing the collection of names of people who might be critical of the present Administration by that Administration's Justice Department? Taking of names is now copacetic?

Imagine if the Obama Justice Department had done the same thing, all them now silent supposed "freedom" lovers would be screaming, Hannity would have to have a double hour special
 
archives said:
"If you have nothing to hide then don't worry," seriously?

So your endorsing the collection of names of people who might be critical of the present Administration by that Administration's Justice Department? Taking of names is now copacetic?

Imagine if the Obama Justice Department had done the same thing, all them now silent supposed "freedom" lovers would be screaming, Hannity would have to have a double hour special
Click to expand...


did you hear about the IRS scandal under Obummer?

don't tell me the govt didn't watch conservatives online when dems ran the show
 
God Emperor said:
did you hear about the IRS scandal under Obummer?

don't tell me the govt didn't watch conservatives online when dems ran the show
Click to expand...

But if you remember those hearing, it was never a scandal, nothing deliberate was established or proven, this is a direct collecting of names, very unconstitutional
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top