Proof: Leak not Hack

[tsuke]

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/08/11/proof-leak-not-hack/

Proof: Leak not Hack

I do my best to make original content for this blog which is why I rarely link to anything outside of it. I am breaking this rule today because this issue is too important. I shared a link yesterday to an article providing forensic proof that the DNC files were obtained via leaks and not by hacks. The main response I got is that the article was too complicated and difficult to understand which is a fair assessment. Like I mentioned however it is too important to leave it at that. I will try to explain the article in simpler terms today. *This is a link to the article*forensic proof. https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/*

In short the article claims that the speed of transfer is too fast for it to have happened over the internet. It could only have happened if someone accessed it over a LAN. This means that it could not have been a hack, done over the internet, but a leak done in person.

Transfer Speed

When you transfer data from one device to another it is slower when you go through the internet than when you transfer it in person like from a flash drive. This is mainly because of two reasons. First when you transfer data over the internet there are multiple layers of connections you have to pass thru which slow down the connection. As opposed to having a flash drive where the only connection is in between the device and your computer. *Second if you're using the internet to transfer data it like you are making a delivery thru a crowded highway. Other users are on the road and you are only as fast as the conditions of the road will allow. If you transfer data directly from one device to another it is like you are using a private highway.

Let me provide a real world example to make things clearer. When you download porn via torrent and you only have one seeder it is very slow. Your computer has to connect with his and the speed of transfer depends on the quality of both of your internet connections. If you were transferring from a flash drive then these factors would not matter.*

The forensic analysts determined that the transfer rate was 23 MB/s. It could not have been done thru the internet especially when the hacking computer is supposed to have been located all the way in Romania. Check the link provided earlier for the exact methodology used.

Seth Rich

In response to this the left will try to make this all about the murder of Seth Rich. In our hearts Republicans know that Seth was murdered most likely by the Clintons. In the same vein we also know that proof for this will never be found. By making the conversation about the murder they can ignore all the evidence regarding the leaks.*

In any case we now have scientific data driven evidence available to the public that the data was obtained from a leak and not a hack.

What evidence have you seen to show otherwise?

 

[Celticguy]

There has never been evidence of a hack.

 

[anatta]

I have always found this idea of a Russian "cutout" delivering the hacked over the internet data to Wiki to be a convenient ghost.

Much more likely it was an inside job via thumbdrive

 

[archives]

View attachment 4533

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/08/11/proof-leak-not-hack/

Proof: Leak not Hack

I do my best to make original content for this blog which is why I rarely link to anything outside of it. I am breaking this rule today because this issue is too important. I shared a link yesterday to an article providing forensic proof that the DNC files were obtained via leaks and not by hacks. The main response I got is that the article was too complicated and difficult to understand which is a fair assessment. Like I mentioned however it is too important to leave it at that. I will try to explain the article in simpler terms today. *This is a link to the article*forensic proof. https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/*

In short the article claims that the speed of transfer is too fast for it to have happened over the internet. It could only have happened if someone accessed it over a LAN. This means that it could not have been a hack, done over the internet, but a leak done in person.

Transfer Speed

When you transfer data from one device to another it is slower when you go through the internet than when you transfer it in person like from a flash drive. This is mainly because of two reasons. First when you transfer data over the internet there are multiple layers of connections you have to pass thru which slow down the connection. As opposed to having a flash drive where the only connection is in between the device and your computer. *Second if you're using the internet to transfer data it like you are making a delivery thru a crowded highway. Other users are on the road and you are only as fast as the conditions of the road will allow. If you transfer data directly from one device to another it is like you are using a private highway.

Let me provide a real world example to make things clearer. When you download porn via torrent and you only have one seeder it is very slow. Your computer has to connect with his and the speed of transfer depends on the quality of both of your internet connections. If you were transferring from a flash drive then these factors would not matter.*

The forensic analysts determined that the transfer rate was 23 MB/s. It could not have been done thru the internet especially when the hacking computer is supposed to have been located all the way in Romania. Check the link provided earlier for the exact methodology used.

Seth Rich

In response to this the left will try to make this all about the murder of Seth Rich. In our hearts Republicans know that Seth was murdered most likely by the Clintons. In the same vein we also know that proof for this will never be found. By making the conversation about the murder they can ignore all the evidence regarding the leaks.*

In any case we now have scientific data driven evidence available to the public that the data was obtained from a leak and not a hack.

What evidence have you seen to show otherwise?

Now is this the new official deflection to KremlinGate or should we expect the Lynch, Obama, Rice, or Schultz conspiracies to resurface anytime soon?

 

[Darth Omar]

I think it's a mistake to bring Seth Rich into it, even though the circumstances around his death are highly suspicious.

An equally likely suspect is Wasserman's IT guy, Awan. It may have been Seth Rich, but he can't plea bargain.

 

[domer76]

View attachment 4533

https://tsukesthoughts.wordpress.com/2017/08/11/proof-leak-not-hack/

Proof: Leak not Hack

I do my best to make original content for this blog which is why I rarely link to anything outside of it. I am breaking this rule today because this issue is too important. I shared a link yesterday to an article providing forensic proof that the DNC files were obtained via leaks and not by hacks. The main response I got is that the article was too complicated and difficult to understand which is a fair assessment. Like I mentioned however it is too important to leave it at that. I will try to explain the article in simpler terms today. *This is a link to the article*forensic proof. https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/guccifer-2-ngp-van-metadata-analysis/*

In short the article claims that the speed of transfer is too fast for it to have happened over the internet. It could only have happened if someone accessed it over a LAN. This means that it could not have been a hack, done over the internet, but a leak done in person.

Transfer Speed

When you transfer data from one device to another it is slower when you go through the internet than when you transfer it in person like from a flash drive. This is mainly because of two reasons. First when you transfer data over the internet there are multiple layers of connections you have to pass thru which slow down the connection. As opposed to having a flash drive where the only connection is in between the device and your computer. *Second if you're using the internet to transfer data it like you are making a delivery thru a crowded highway. Other users are on the road and you are only as fast as the conditions of the road will allow. If you transfer data directly from one device to another it is like you are using a private highway.

Let me provide a real world example to make things clearer. When you download porn via torrent and you only have one seeder it is very slow. Your computer has to connect with his and the speed of transfer depends on the quality of both of your internet connections. If you were transferring from a flash drive then these factors would not matter.*

The forensic analysts determined that the transfer rate was 23 MB/s. It could not have been done thru the internet especially when the hacking computer is supposed to have been located all the way in Romania. Check the link provided earlier for the exact methodology used.

Seth Rich

In response to this the left will try to make this all about the murder of Seth Rich. In our hearts Republicans know that Seth was murdered most likely by the Clintons. In the same vein we also know that proof for this will never be found. By making the conversation about the murder they can ignore all the evidence regarding the leaks.*

In any case we now have scientific data driven evidence available to the public that the data was obtained from a leak and not a hack.

What evidence have you seen to show otherwise?

John Parnell Walker

 

[archives]

I think it's a mistake to bring Seth Rich into it, even though the circumstances around his death are highly suspicious.

An equally likely suspect is Wasserman's IT guy, Awan. It may have been Seth Rich, but he can't plea bargain.

Must be then that you agree with "tsuke" then that "Republicans know that Seth was murdered most likely by the Clintons"

And I'm sure that if anyone here stated that in their heart they knew the Trumps colluded with Russia that you would say it was complete absurdity

All just the latest right wing attempt to deflect off of KremlinGate, sure Hannity will fill hours and individuals as yourself will buy it and any conspiracy peddled that serves the same purpose

 

[Darth Omar]

Must be then that you agree with "tsuke" then that "Republicans know that Seth was murdered most likely by the Clintons"

And I'm sure that if anyone here stated that in their heart they knew the Trumps colluded with Russia that you would say it was complete absurdity

All just the latest right wing attempt to deflect off of KremlinGate, sure Hannity will fill hours and individuals as yourself will buy it and any conspiracy peddled that serves the same purpose

Awan is real. His association with Wasserman as an IT specialist is real. No conspiracy.

It's entirely plausible Awan had access to the relevant DNC files and emails, since Wasserman was head of the DNC. So anyone more interested in the truth than simply hanging Trump, is interested in Awan.

Including, Robert Mueller.

 

[archives]

Awan is real. His association with Wasserman as an IT specialist is real. No conspiracy.

It's entirely plausible Awan had access to the relevant DNC files and emails, since Wasserman was head of the DNC. So anyone more interested in the truth than simply hanging Trump, is interested in Awan.

Including, Robert Mueller.

"It's entirely plausible." entirely plausible hasn't even reached the level of circumstantial evidence, the right has been "investigating" entirely plausible for nearly nine years now, thirty years if consider the Clintons, and have yet proven, that is proven beyond "in your heart," anything

As I said, just another right conspiracy in an attempt to deflect the seriousness of KremlinGate, sells with the base, keeps the likes of Hannity and talk radio in the bucks without having to explain KremlinGate, and at least there is circumstantial evidence beyond "entirely possible" with KremlinGate

 

[Darth Omar]

"It's entirely plausible." entirely plausible hasn't even reached the level of circumstantial evidence, the right has been "investigating" entirely plausible for nearly nine years now, thirty years if consider the Clintons, and have yet proven, that is proven beyond "in your heart," anything

As I said, just another right conspiracy in an attempt to deflect the seriousness of KremlinGate, sells with the base, keeps the likes of Hannity and talk radio in the bucks without having to explain KremlinGate, and at least there is circumstantial evidence beyond "entirely possible" with KremlinGate

Nine[!] different investigations and zero indictments.

Maybe they should look somewhere else. If they're interested in the truth.

 

[archives]

Nine[!] different investigations and zero indictments.

Maybe they should look somewhere else. If they're interested in the truth.

Wait a minute, the nine "investigations" were on BenghaziGate, and that last six years, and produced nothing, plus the Congressional "investigations" are being conducted by a GOP Congress, they ain't going indict anyone, however, we do have a Special Council, one only at it a couple of months now, stay tuned

 

[Phantasmal]

Awan is real. His association with Wasserman as an IT specialist is real. No conspiracy.

It's entirely plausible Awan had access to the relevant DNC files and emails, since Wasserman was head of the DNC. So anyone more interested in the truth than simply hanging Trump, is interested in Awan.

Including, Robert Mueller.

Mueller probably is interested, prosecutors are naturally curious people, but he's busy right now. I'm pretty sure FBI is looking into it, I certainly hope so.