Does North Korea have WMD?

Darth Omar said:
The most plausible win scenario is China pulling the plug on Bowl Cut---without a single shot being fired.

And they would do it because China fears war on the Korean Peninsula just as bad was we do.

If that happens, maybe you'll be able to finally address Trump by his proper title lol. Though you'll more likely try and deny his role in it. Such is the nature of TD.
Click to expand...

My thinking is lil kim is pretty leery of the chinese..

I don't see them just going in & doing away w/ him w/out pretense & political cover...

The chinese getting rid of him wont change my extremely low opinion of the dirty, nor should it..

I could possibly upgrade him back up to an ostentatious asshole but he would need to grow up another year or two, acting like @ least in his mid to upper teens..
 
Corazón said:
Sorry Bill but getting a 15-0 vote at the UN for more swingeing sanctions is a big deal, you just won't acknowledge that fact. Maybe if you stopped pouting so much you might see that.
Click to expand...

I guess we will see exactly how big of a deal it is when the fool fires off another missile.......
 
Corazón said:
I am not even saying he's a genius but he does understand human psychology at a visceral level.
Click to expand...

That's why he is always firing ppl?? Seems if he knew them so well he wouldn't need to keep stabbing them in the back for their loyalty..
 
archives said:
North Korea has a million man army, and has had close to seventy years to establish a defense against any kind of attack.

For us to attack as such would be an major endeavor and cost thousands of American military lives, North Korea ain't Iraq
Click to expand...

How soon you forget. They talked up the Iraq army too, and the supposed vaunted republican guard. But like all things Republican it folded like a cocktail napkin. No wmd, no defense, nothing.
 
Corazón said:
Yeah if it is dragged out of you with wild horses, even then it is done with a sneer and a snarl.
Click to expand...
No, I mentioned it in another post. You didn't have to drag it out of me, now, back to my question.

The Art of the Deal, the ghost writer says...
 
charver said:
That might be more to do with current circumstance than anything else, no?
Click to expand...

But can you separate Trump from the present circumstances?

Bowl Cut threatening to nuke the US under Madame Hillary would have elicited a more muted response, imo. Hillary is proven to be more comfortable exercising US power in North African backwaters, recklessly and pointlessly, where the downside in terms of US casualties is minimal to nonexistent.

At the risk of being crude [oh hell, it is crude] it takes balls to credibly project US military power on the Korean Peninsula.

THAT, gets China's attention. It gets the UN's attention.

I would argue there would be no 15-0 Security Council vote without Trump. I disagree with Niki Haley on Assad but she deserves credit as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top