impotent old man threatens NKorea if they make threats~unlike the 1,000's in the past

it's a threat that if lil Kim keeps doing this- events are going to cause a war. Trump is laying down a marker.
No more business as usual- the days of kicking the can down the road have brought us to a precipice

I'm less concerned with his actual words then with him laying down the marker this cannot stand when he's armed.
We can't allow a nuclear N.Korea with the hostile lil Kim at the helm.
It's too unstable,and the risks are then too high
A marker, yes, a line, the threat was vague, and obviously not well thought out, as usual.
 
Today, 02:51 PM
Sailor
Verified User
This message is hidden because Sailor is on your ignore list.


Shhh sonny, we are discussing important issue of the day, as men of letters do.
 
All I can say is he doesn't need to be that sane, just not suicidal. He doesn't need to be the Pope or a chess wizard to understand the US will turn their country to glass if he were to attack.
If he is suicidal, drink some bleach. So we need a "rational actor" in only the most broad sense, the "not suicidal megalomaniacal mass murderer" sense. There is some wiggle room there.
i get your point on wiggle room. but we need to have some ability to find some confidence he's just wiggling.

Maybe i'm missing it,but everything so far looks like he not going to eventually give us any choice
 
Trump took on the republican establishment and Hillary and beat both of them, when beating just one would have been noteworthy.

No hoax there.

This isn't a prediction, but his hard a** approach to NK could lead to a resolution of the problem. Something Obama or Bush couldn't do. And if it happens without bombs and bullets, Trump would be deserving of a Nobel Peace Prize.

Heads would explode lol.
To recap...the goal for the past few presidents is to get NK to end their nuke program. trump sent an armada to NK, and since then Lil Kim has been thumbing his nose at the U.S.

Are you lowering the bar for trump, as everyone has for his entire life? Is a de escalation of the trump aggression via an armada a 'win'? Or do you believe that NK is ever going to stop working on their nuke program? Because Libya pretty much put an end to that pipe dream. NK will never stop advancing their nuclear program.
 
To recap...the goal for the past few presidents is to get NK to end their nuke program. trump sent an armada to NK, and since then Lil Kim has been thumbing his nose at the U.S.

Are you lowering the bar for trump, as everyone has for his entire life? Is a de escalation of the trump aggression via an armada a 'win'? Or do you believe that NK is ever going to stop working on their nuke program? Because Libya pretty much put an end to that pipe dream. NK will never stop advancing their nuclear program.
Exactly, they tie it to their sovereignty.
 
Let's assume NK gains a nuclear deterrent, that does not mean NK is suicidal. They aren't getting one to launch. Let's face it, we can always nuke them, that's always an option. And what kind of crazy would they have to be to attack the United States?
That's just suicide. They don't need the USA to commit suicide. They can slit their own throats any day they decide to. So, I'm afraid we ride this out and maybe some better opportunity will emerge before they have the deterrent. And on the upside
Trump won't go down as a mass murderer.
Which is exactly the position real U.S leaders have been taking for decades. trump needs to get his crimes out of the news, so he pokes the idiot in NK with a stick.


It's like a sequel to 'Dumb and Dumber'.
 
To recap...the goal for the past few presidents is to get NK to end their nuke program. trump sent an armada to NK, and since then Lil Kim has been thumbing his nose at the U.S.

Are you lowering the bar for trump, as everyone has for his entire life? Is a de escalation of the trump aggression via an armada a 'win'? Or do you believe that NK is ever going to stop working on their nuke program? Because Libya pretty much put an end to that pipe dream. NK will never stop advancing their nuclear program.
So in that case you are saying that confrontation is inevitable, n'est-ce pas?
 
Surely vague is good, it is subject to interpretation. Now we all know that Obama would never do anything similar, don't we?

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligence...a-wont-rule-out-initiating-a-nuclear-war.html

Please provide the quote, idiot. When did Obama threaten "to rain fire and brimstone and 4 horses the likes of which has never been experienced outside a technicolor biblical movie" if a world leader didn't clamp his trap?
Im confused. Can you plesae clear that up? PS it won't be cleared up by Obama's grudging refusal upon advice of his military to change the existing (and wholly ridiculous) no first use pledge.
 
To recap...the goal for the past few presidents is to get NK to end their nuke program. trump sent an armada to NK, and since then Lil Kim has been thumbing his nose at the U.S.

Are you lowering the bar for trump, as everyone has for his entire life? Is a de escalation of the trump aggression via an armada a 'win'? Or do you believe that NK is ever going to stop working on their nuke program? Because Libya pretty much put an end to that pipe dream. NK will never stop advancing their nuclear program.

No, they will never stop until they are stopped.

Nothing done to this point has worked so Trump has tried a more agressive approach. China, for example, hasn't felt this kind of pressure before. And they are the key player if you want a non-military solution.

And the only way to get China to budge is to get serious with NK. I think it makes perfect sense. The only other option is status quo diplomacy and even you agree that doesn't work.
 
So in that case you are saying that confrontation is inevitable, n'est-ce pas?
No. I'm saying that trump confronted NK as his first order of business, and Lil Kim laughed at him.

Real world leaders know that he should be ignored. As has been outlined already in this thread....NK will have a nuke, and they'll feel important. Crazy or not, Kim isn't suicidal.
 
Please provide the quote, idiot. When did Obama threaten "to rain fire and brimstone and 4 horses the likes of which has never been experienced outside a technicolor biblical movie" if a world leader didn't clamp his trap?
Im confused. Can you plesae clear that up? PS it won't be cleared up by Obama's grudging refusal upon advice of his military to change the existing (and wholly ridiculous) no first use pledge.
Please go fuck yourself!
 
No, they will never stop until they are stopped.

Nothing done to this point has worked so Trump has tried a more agressive approach. China, for example, hasn't felt this kind of pressure before. And they are the key player if you want a non-military solution.

And the only way to get China to budge is to get serious with NK. I think it makes perfect sense. The only other option is status quo diplomacy and even you agree that doesn't work.
There is no diplomacy with NK..we agree. But the armada was an idiotic idea. China was an afterthought, but that's how trump's little mind works.
 
Many think the bigger risk is Pakistan and India lobbing nukes at each other. Moe parity, proximity and mutual antipathy.
 
Back
Top