Google fires employee for saying men are superior. Why wasn't Michelle fired.?

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
The press is howling about the google worker who said men are smarter and more aggressive and that's why they do better. OTOH it was Aug 6 2014 when the First Tranny said "women are smarter than men.” and nothing was done to her.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/aug/6/michelle-obama-women-are-smarter-than-men/

First lady Michelle Obama on Wednesday proudly stated she believes women are the smarter sex and must use prominent positions in government, business and other endeavors to affect change.

Speaking at a women’s forum at the U.S.-Africa Leaders Summit in Washington alongside former first lady Laura Bush, Mrs. Obama said women in power cannot waste their opportunities because they’re simply more intelligent than men.

“Every time I meet a child I think, who knows what’s going on in her life, whether she was just bullied or whether she had a bad day at school or whether she lost a parent — that interaction that we have with that individual, that child for that moment, could change their life,” she said. “So we can’t waste this spotlight. It is temporary and life is short, and change is needed. And women are smarter than men.”

Mrs. Obama’s joke drew laughter and applause from the crowd. She then told the men in the audience they “can’t complain, because you’re outnumbered today.”
Click to expand...
 
there are fewer female sociopaths


that is a fact


women make better leaders because of that
 
because people believed she was joking.

they believed her because she has integrity


your shit believed women are lessor and his corporation decided he was now bad ju ju.



you being a racist sociopath will not be able to grok these things.


just build a bunker and climb in and shut the door.


You racists lost


everyone hates you
 
evince said:
because people believed she was joking.

they believed her because she has integrity


your shit believed women are lessor and his corporation decided he was now bad ju ju.



you being a racist sociopath will not be able to grok these things.


just build a bunker and climb in and shut the door.


You racists lost


everyone hates you
Click to expand...

somebody tell me this ^^^^^isn't a real person
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
The press is howling about the google worker who said men are smarter and more aggressive and that's why they do better. OTOH it was Aug 6 2014 when the First Tranny said "women are smarter than men.” and nothing was done to her.
Click to expand...

Pretty said you have to go back three years to get in a dig at Michelle. Especially since her comment was a joke.
 
The categorization of the memo as "anti-diversity" is a lie intended to sucker the idiots who didn't bother to read the memo. Actual scientists (of which the memo author is one) weighed in on the content of the memo and his science is sound.

Progressive ideology demands that sexual preference must be genetic, gender identity must be genetic, but job choices of given genders must be nurture-based.


The truth is, the choices of professions of adults has a lot to do with the environment they developed in inutero. The presence of testosterone during brain development is strongly correlated with a child's preferences for mechanical or human toys (Tonka Trucks versus baby dolls), and this carries through to their adult choices in what would be rewarding professions to work in. The memo author simply pointed out that given the prevailing science, Google's goals should be to cater the tech work environment to what women find rewarding if you want more women to value a tech career.

All Google has done is proven that their goal is to silence opposition, promote the very echo chamber that the memo is meant to fix, and that they really don't choose to go where the science takes them.

Given the amazing irony of the "we fired him for his views to protect the freedom to speak our mind" Google position, it seems quite possible that the Google decisions was made not because of his statements regarding the science of gender differences, but was based on his statements regarding the need for more conservative voices in Google Inc.

(I'd post links to Quillette article and Deborah Soh's article in Globe and Mail, but I can't yet)
 
domer76 said:
lol

More "if/would" bullshit. Words of a fucking loser. You don't know "if/would" from shit, punk.

Just another run-of-the-mill, piece of shit white trash.
Click to expand...

HAHAHA. The board notes that all you have is namecalling. Address the issue. Why wasn't the first tranny crucified for saying men are inferior?
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
HAHAHA. The board notes that all you have is namecalling. Address the issue. Why wasn't the first tranny crucified for saying men are inferior?
Click to expand...

"If/would"

Hypothesis contrary to fact.

You concoct the premise and proceed as if it were fact. Automatic failure, moron. In the history of mankind, fucktard, "if" has never happened. But for massive losers like you, it's the best you have.
 
jmotivator said:
Google's goals should be to cater the tech work environment to what women find rewarding if you want more women to value a tech career.
Click to expand...

And that's pretty much impossible. Women don't have the interest in tech that men have. They want "people jobs" like social worker or english teacher and those jobs are easy and will always pay poorly.
 
Private companies can fire employees for making public comments that they don't want to be associated with. First Ladies are essentially private citizens (though some laws require them to follow the same rules as government employees they don't receive a salary).
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Private companies can fire employees for making public comments that they don't want to be associated with. First Ladies are essentially private citizens (though some laws require them to follow the same rules as government employees they don't receive a salary).
Click to expand...

Who made a counter argument to that? I think it is patently absurd for Google to state that they had to fire him for his statements so that people would feel safe to speak their minds. Are they that lacking in self awareness, or just hard pressed to put a positive spin on this clear act of protecting the company echo chamber? I'm guessing the latter.
 
jmotivator said:
Who made a counter argument to that? I think it is patently absurd for Google to state that they had to fire him for his statements so that people would feel safe to speak their minds. Are they that lacking in self awareness, or just hard pressed to put a positive spin on this clear act of protecting the company echo chamber? I'm guessing the latter.
Click to expand...

He's now free to find another company echo chamber.
 
Mr.Badguy said:
Private companies can fire employees for making public comments that they don't want to be associated with. First Ladies are essentially private citizens (though some laws require them to follow the same rules as government employees they don't receive a salary).
Click to expand...


Michelle was a private citizen??? Did not get a salary? HAHAHA. Are private citizens allowed to grab their kids and mom and take vacations all over the world on the taxpayers dime?? She stole what?? Maybe 40 million bucks from the country. We paid her a fortune. THINK
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top