zappasguitar
Well-known member
Cite where he said he "wanted" a grand jury impaneled to investigate Hillary.
Its right there in the OP.
Cite where he said he "wanted" a grand jury impaneled to investigate Hillary.
Its right there in the OP.
Zappasguitar, I will let you pick the topic if you want and you may set the rules.
I look forward to our debate.
Its right there in the OP.
No it is not. Cite his words that he "wants" or "wanted". If not, you're a liar.
Don't forget how specific you are when asking people to prove you lied, you want EXACT words.
Don't be a hypocrite now.
Its right there in the OP.
Yayurt is gonna be YaYurt ...
Sad little Trumptard...
It's sad really.
YoYo wouldd rather play his infantile "gotcha" games than discuss the topic.
He's always been that way.
As I suspected, Zappas can't back up his claim because he is a liar.
Zappas obviously can only play infantile games and not actually address his OP.
Zappas always make an OP, never backs it up, and then just makes insult posts if anyone questions him about his OP.
And he considers that "civil" debate.
Oh, but I did back it up.
SEVERAL times.
You just continue to whine about it because you don't want to admit I am right.
Cite...
Cite...
Cite please.
Cite please.
Prove it.
Cite her lies.
What is the post number(s) you backed up your claim?
Oh and here is you about people backing up claims.
All this time I've been giving you the benefit of the doubt, but really are dumb as a stump, aren't ya Chachi?
It's right there in the first two paragraphs:
Yesterday, when Jarrett penned an op-ed asking why a grand jury had not been impaneled for former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s mishandling of classified information, he didn't consider a Grand Jury "undemocratic".
NOW all of a sudden, Jarrett believes Grand Juries are an “undemocratic farce”...WHY?
What's different?
If he believe grand juries really are "undemocratic farces", then why would he question why one wasn't impaneled during the Clinton investigation?
Would that not also be an "undemocratic farce"?
Why would he want one impaneled to investigate Hillary if he truly believes they are an undemocratic farce?
Cite where he said he WANTED one you lying sack of poop.
Here merely asked why she didn't get one.
I asked you a question...THREE TIMES NOW...why have you refused to answer it?
If Jarrett REALLY believes grand juries are undemocratic, then why did he question why one wasn't impaneled for Hillary?
I asked you a question...THREE TIMES NOW...why have you refused to answer it?
If Jarrett REALLY believes grand juries are undemocratic, then why did he question why one wasn't impaneled for Hillary?
Once again, for the galacticly retarded, TO POINT OUT HYPOCRISY.
Need me to say it again or are you going to be a pussy and accuse me of running away when I actually said to another posting, thanks for saving me the trouble of saying what you said, IOW, I didn't run away, I thanked another poster for saying what I would have said, so no need to REPEAT what he said you lying fat slob.

Zappasguitar, I will let you pick the topic if you want and you may set the rules.
I look forward to our debate.
Of course the chickenshit won't debate me in a debate challenge.
Is anyone surprised? He talks tough about debating, yet always runs away from any debate challenge.