BREAKING NEWS: Trump dictated Kushner's LIE about Russian lawyer meeting

It was gossip? There is a lawsuit, that hardly seems like gossip.

Two people opine that Trump should not have talked to his own son because it may seem like conspiring to hide something. Are we saying that a father can't speak to his own son? Show me evidence that he did what they accuse him of. Guessing and hearsay is all that has been posted thus far, lawsuit or not.
Trump might be a despicable human being and most of us don't care for his way of running the show, but making accusations without evidence is gossip.
 
Two people opine that Trump should not have talked to his own son because it may seem like conspiring to hide something. Are we saying that a father can't speak to his own son? Show me evidence that he did what they accuse him of. Guessing and hearsay is all that has been posted thus far, lawsuit or not.
Trump might be a despicable human being and most of us don't care for his way of running the show, but making accusations without evidence is gossip.
This isn't a typical father and son, so your premise is bogus. This is the President of the US concocting a story about a meeting with Russians claiming to have damaging information on a political opponent and then possibly conspiring with a news agency to spread fake news. There seems to be more evidence than just gossip.
 
This isn't a typical father and son, so your premise is bogus. This is the President of the US concocting a story about a meeting with Russians claiming to have damaging information on a political opponent and then possibly conspiring with a news agency to spread fake news. There seems to be more evidence than just gossip.

Your opinion is as good as mine, and unless I am given evidence, the conspiracy seems to come from those who gossip.
If he/they are guilty of anything, and it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, fine. Until then we shouldn't make up evidence to fit a desired outcome.
We are hearing more and more about Hillary's involvement, i.e new Emails on Huma's laptop. Shall we run with that too, or should we wait until we have facts?
 
Your opinion is as good as mine, and unless I am given evidence, the conspiracy seems to come from those who gossip.
If he/they are guilty of anything, and it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, fine. Until then we shouldn't make up evidence to fit a desired outcome.
We are hearing more and more about Hillary's involvement, i.e new Emails on Huma's laptop. Shall we run with that too, or should we wait until we have facts?

Squirm weasel, squirm.
 
Your opinion is as good as mine, and unless I am given evidence, the conspiracy seems to come from those who gossip.
If he/they are guilty of anything, and it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, fine. Until then we shouldn't make up evidence to fit a desired outcome.
We are hearing more and more about Hillary's involvement, i.e new Emails on Huma's laptop. Shall we run with that too, or should we wait until we have facts?

Hillary can be investigated as well. They can investigate Obama, too.
i want a transparent government that doesn't break our laws or let foreigner or their agents meddle in our affairs.
 
Your opinion is as good as mine, and unless I am given evidence, the conspiracy seems to come from those who gossip.
If he/they are guilty of anything, and it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, fine. Until then we shouldn't make up evidence to fit a desired outcome.
We are hearing more and more about Hillary's involvement, i.e new Emails on Huma's laptop. Shall we run with that too, or should we wait until we have facts?
We don't know what is evidence and what isn't, isn't that why it is called an investigation?
 
Hillary can be investigated as well. They can investigate Obama, too.
i want a transparent government that doesn't break our laws or let foreigner or their agents meddle in our affairs.

I hate misinterpretations leading to a desired outcome. It seems everyone is an expert on the law these days. Let the professionals handle it. That's all I am saying.
When one thinks _____ did... and reports it as a fact without knowing the fact, and makes it into a partisan issue instead of wanting justice, that is abhorrent to me.
I would guess you argued the same when the right ran with every bit of gossip about _____ during the last administration.
Fairness, justice, that isn't too much to ask. I hate partisan jockeys, regardless which side they are on, and I hate so called journalists who think their opinions are gospel.
 
I researched it last night. It seems that it is very easy to make up accusations and let one word weigh against another. Some say the Prez is lying, others say that the press is often misleading with a false story.
Regurgitating these stories often makes people look petty, and the journalists who report their opinions as truths lose all credibility.

Discussing the lying president is wrong?? You might find kim un or erdo the tyrant of turkey interesting & lovable as well..........:rolleyes:
 
Two people opine that Trump should not have talked to his own son because it may seem like conspiring to hide something. Are we saying that a father can't speak to his own son? Show me evidence that he did what they accuse him of. Guessing and hearsay is all that has been posted thus far, lawsuit or not.
Trump might be a despicable human being and most of us don't care for his way of running the show, but making accusations without evidence is gossip.

BULL SHIT MAX............ No one is saying anything about talking-HE DICTATED IT......:palm:
 
Back
Top