Interesting how the conservatives are relatively quiet on the President's

"Not thinking about it," so the President, who talks about loyalty endlessly, befitting in public probably his biggest supporter doesn't register anything in your thinking?

No. There are actual things of significance aplenty for me to ponder. You boys worry enough over silly shit no one else need bother.
 
trump is playing 4d chess.

Or just being Trump lol.

I get the idea there's a few former employees of Trump's out there that get what Trump is doing with Sessions because Trump did the same thing with them. Trump gets on Sessions, the next thing you know Sessions is investigating IC leaks. It's not 4-D chess so much as the way Trump operated in the private sector.

The paid pundits are almost always wrong about Trump's methods.
 
And I always thought the job of the Attorney General was to uphold the law not attack "your enemy"

As far as I'm concerned this is more proof of how loyalty flows only one way with trump. He like you as long as you're useful to him, show some independence and it's goodnight Gracie.

If this is how he treats one of his oldest, most loyal supporters then nobody's safe.
 
trump beat 16 other seasoned candidates in his primary including jeb bush who had a 100 million dollar war chest with insider support, faded an entire insurrection from his party with the nevertrump movement and then beat hillary clinton who had been planning their presidential run for the past 2 decades, and then he won 3 states republicans almost never win. Trump wins. He's a closer, and he plays 4d chess while you liberals will always continue to underestimate him.

Why did he lose in 12'?
 
0) maybe he was just testing the waters back then and wasn't planning on a full campaign assault?

1) I think it takes time to build up enough political capital that you can be seen as a serious candidate. He maybe wasn't at full mojo capacity in '12

2) Harder to run agains the incumbent, especially a black jesus type.

3) Romney had heavily groomed from going deep in the 08' election so he was a very natural choice for many

4) less groomed candidates in 2016 besides bush and people were sick of dynastys. They wanted something new and fresh. Trump had good timing
 
You mean that the GOP base is composed of slack-jawed, sparse-toothed, anti-intellectual suckers who are easy pickings for liars and con artists, and in that in a race to the bottom which depended on suppressing the opposition's voter-turnout, no one can beat Donald Trump.

You forgot the Russians lol.
 
You forgot the Russians lol.

I rarely bring up the Russians unless I'm talking to anatta. Even without Russian collusion (which probably originates from urine-soaked blackmail and/or money laundering for Russian oligarchs), Trump isn't qualified to be a janitor in the White House. You support him and buy his lies, that's on you. Within a year, you'll be jumping on the next bandwagon and pretending that you never supported Trump. Just like you pretend that you never supported Bush.
 
I rarely bring up the Russians unless I'm talking to anatta. Even without Russian collusion (which probably originates from urine-soaked blackmail and/or money laundering for Russian oligarchs), Trump isn't qualified to be a janitor in the White House. You support him and buy his lies, that's on you. Within a year, you'll be jumping on the next bandwagon and pretending that you never supported Trump. Just like you pretend that you never supported Bush.

Is that a prediction lol?
 
assault on Attorney General Sessions. With everyone in the Cabinet, he has to be the truest Trumpkin, bought in early, put himself out there as the first major endorsement, and has pursued enforcement policies favored on the right for decades.

You can't argue he is a pure conservative from a ruby red State, so why the sudden silence on the right when the President not only attacks but actually belittles him?

Another moronic false narrative from the anti-America media and leftist. Yep, the only adjective that can be used whenever Trump is critical of something or someone is "ATTACK."

Ever notice how whenever Obama "ATTACKED" his political opponents the preferred adjective from the anti-America media was "challenged?"

Cry harder snowflakes. The Republicans that go along with this nonsense will hopefully find themselves out of a job in the midterms or later and subsequently replaced by real conservatives who know what winning feels like.
 
attacking Sessions is a bad idea. lots of reasons why. I get Trump's frustration at having SPrun wild,but it's not sessions fault.

Sessions took the advice of the best swamp advisors in Washington.....OR, he could have a spine. Something many Washington veterans on the Republican side of the aisle have lost.
 
"Not thinking about it," so the President, who talks about loyalty endlessly, befitting in public probably his biggest supporter doesn't register anything in your thinking?

It is stupid and naïve to believe that Obama didn't command "loyalty" from his cabinet. Are liberals really this dishonest or just flat out naïve and stupid?
 
Trump isn't qualified to be a janitor in the White House. You support him and buy his lies, that's on you. Within a year, you'll be jumping on the next bandwagon and pretending that you never supported Trump.

You know who supports Trump?

Our Military men and women, LAw enforcement agencies across the nation, our Border Patrol Agents.

Maybe YOU"RE the one on the wrong team
 
I'd never bet good money on what the American people might do: they seem to include some of the best and some of the worst people on earth and lack serious education, which is why the peasantry elected Trump. We can hardly talk, after the incredibly stupid Brexit vote - but I do wonder seriously if mind-manipulation and unreason aren't taking over the earth. Imagine everywhere full of the smell of trumping!
 
Back
Top