Explain this to me...

[Cancel 2018.2]

If you listen closely you will see the Rump is not denying that he was asking his lawyers about his Authority to pardon himself and others.

He and his spokesman are denying that Rump is thanking about pardoning anyone.

But what I find particularly interesting, almost every time the subject comes up, while they are denying that Rump is thinking about pardoning anyone, they specifically and almost universally keep pointing out to the public that Rumps power is plenary and Universal and absolute... (Many constitutional scholars say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself ) why are they trying so hard to plant the seed in peoples head?

The Constitution clearly says that the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment.

Where in the constitution does it "clearly" say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment?

 

[Darth Omar]

Because I think he's laying the groundwork, or trying to lay the groundwork, to get his idiot followers to be OK with it when he has to issue some pardons.

You know what?

I'd be ok with it because it's a patently obvious attempt to overturn the election.

 

[Darth Omar]

Where in the constitution does it "clearly" say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment?

Where in the Constitution does it say SP's can go in search of a crime when none exists?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

The only people who said Trump was not under investigation did so before Trump was being investigated for obstruction of justice. Now, based on lots of information it appears he is also being investigated for money laundering and collusion.

Appears? Is he or isn't he under investigation? Stop with the bullshit and speak the truth.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

Where in the Constitution does it say SP's can go in search of a crime when none exists?

It doesn't.

 

[Mr.Badguy]

You know what?

I'd be ok with it because it's a patently obvious attempt to overturn the election.

So Jarod is correct.

 

[tinfoil]

I like presidents that don't pardon themselves

 

[tinfoil]

Where in the constitution does it "clearly" say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment?

http://constitutionus.com/
Section 2
1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

 

[evince]

"offences"


if there is no crime he cant pardon someone

 

[evince]

Where in the constitution does it "clearly" say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment?

now tell jarod he was correct and you were wrong

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

http://constitutionus.com/
Section 2
1: The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices, and he shall have Power to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences against the United States, except in Cases of Impeachment.

Thank you.

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

now tell jarod he was correct and you were wrong

I wasn't wrong, I asked a question you crack head.

 

[evince]

why did you ask him that question

 

[evince]

If you listen closely you will see the Rump is not denying that he was asking his lawyers about his Authority to pardon himself and others.

He and his spokesman are denying that Rump is thanking about pardoning anyone.

But what I find particularly interesting, almost every time the subject comes up, while they are denying that Rump is thinking about pardoning anyone, they specifically and almost universally keep pointing out to the public that Rumps power is plenary and Universal and absolute... (Many constitutional scholars say the president does not have the authority to pardon himself ) why are they trying so hard to plant the seed in peoples head?

The Constitution clearly says that the president does not have the authority to pardon himself in matters of impeachment.

because you doubted his veracity

 

[Darth Omar]

So Jarod is correct.

I called it a 'Superfluous Prosecutor' back when it was limited to Russian collusion and even obstruction with Comey.

I thought it was stupid since they already had congress investigating it but it was like, whatever. But when Leaky Mueller made it an open-ended *search* for crime in Trump's personal business dealings years ago, I'm calling foul on it.

If Trump manages to call it off or subvert the witch hunt, I'll be cheering from the side lines.

 

[evince]

being bought by russia does not have a one year experation date asshole

 

[Truth Detector]

Wait a minute, there is "no Russian involvement" based upon the word of Julian Assange? For real? So all those intelligence entities are wrong because Julian Assamge said so?

Well, he is the guy who owns Wikileaks and clearly stated the information did not come from Russia. Wait a minute, so you are believing all these entities when they claimed Iraq had WMDs? Or is this a sudden change of heart because it's about Trump?

Then you add that the President isn't part of any investigation cause his lawyer said so?

Do you have any proof that he is? How so? Link us up dumbfuck.

But all that is only topped by the "authoritarian" statement that "Clinton was most certainly guilty," even though no one ever found her guilty of anything at anytime even after six years of trying.

There was a massive pile of evidence and videos proving it in their own words; how fucking dense are you? Don't answer that; it is obvious you're a partisan hack on steroids and devoid of facts or anything remotely connected to the truth.

And lastly, the heads of the Trump campaign meeting with Russian agents hoping to secure information provided by the Russian Gov't is the "there" you think is missing

They didn't meet any heads of state or Russian agents you ignorant buffoon. We know what is missing; you're brain and ability to have a coherent thought without parroting the DNC talking points like a mindless dullard.

 

[Truth Detector]

If you thought that the president was a pawn, or at least a useful idiot beholden to a foreign power you wouldn't want them out of office?

I thought you loved Obama?

 

[Truth Detector]

Because I think he's laying the groundwork, or trying to lay the groundwork, to get his idiot followers to be OK with it when he has to issue some pardons.

Pardons for what? What crimes have been committed and being investigated regarding Trump or his campaign?

 

[Cancel 2018.2]

why did you ask him that question

Doesn't matter crack head, I asked it. Answer it or stfu.