Sessions big-gov't views on marijuana

C

Cancel 2020.1

Canceled
He is such an idiot when it comes to pot. It is pretty dismaying that someone so clueless can be calling policy when it comes to this issue.

His views are basically '50's era, "Reefer Madness" paranoia. He makes claims such as marijuana leading to opioid addiction and being only "slightly less awful" than heroin that actually fly in the face of scientific evidence. Opioid addiction has gone down in states where medical marijuana is legal. And this is not surprising - if pot is prescribed for pain, it obviously gives patients and doctors an alternative to much more addicting and dangerous painkillers.

Now, he wants the ability to enforce federal laws on pot, and basically ignore states rights. It really makes me sick to think about. How can small-gov't, states rights conservatives support this?
 
ROFLMAO

How dare he enforce federal law. What the fuck is he thinking. I think it is laughable that you are all of a sudden a champion of states rights.

Thanks for the chuckle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
Teflon Don said:
ROFLMAO

How dare he enforce federal law. What the fuck is he thinking. I think it is laughable that you are all of a sudden a champion of states rights.

Thanks for the chuckle

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

That's a sad response. I have always been a states rights guy - always.

The federal law is outdated, and states have been leading on this issue. The vast majority of Americans now support legalization - particularly for medical. By pushing the federal law, he is directly opposing the will of the people.

You guys are not small gov't. That's one of the phoniest positions you take.
 
Darth Omar said:
You were States rights on gay marriage? I must have missed that.
Click to expand...

I'm states rights on everything.

This is the problem koolaid-drinking hacks like you have. You assume that everyone thinks like you in terms of mindlessly supporting one side or the other. Stop fucking assuming that I'm "Joe Liberal" on everything. I'm states rights, anti-war whether it's a Dem or Republican, pro privatizing SS, pro domestic drilling, anti-tax, et al.

I am not like you. And while we're on that topic - where is your condemnation of the BIG government measures inferred by the OP?

Hypocrite.
 
Thing1 said:
That's a sad response. I have always been a states rights guy - always.

The federal law is outdated, and states have been leading on this issue. The vast majority of Americans now support legalization - particularly for medical. By pushing the federal law, he is directly opposing the will of the people.

You guys are not small gov't. That's one of the phoniest positions you take.
Click to expand...

You weren't for states rights on queer marriage so go fuck yourself

There is no such thing as "medical marijuana" it is a lie you have been fed. But I don't expect to convince someone as ignorant as you.

I know you got used to your boy Obama just ignoring laws he didn't like. But we are supposed to be a nation of laws and it is Sessions job to enforce them. Spare me your faux indignation and fake support of states rights. You are making my side hurt from laughing.

Change the federal laws if your don't like em.
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
You weren't for states rights on queer marriage so go fuck yourself

There is no such thing as "medical marijuana" it is a lie you have been fed. But I don't expect to convince someone as ignorant as you.

I know you got used to your boy Obama just ignoring laws he didn't like. But we are supposed to be a nation of laws and it is Sessions job to enforce them. Spare me your faux indignation and fake support of states rights. You are making my side hurt from laughing.

Change the federal laws if your don't like em.
Click to expand...

You're really a complete fucking imbecile.
 
I'll mark all of the phony righties on here down as being all in on bigger, more powerful federal government.

Thanks for clarifying, guys.
 
Thing1 said:
I'll mark all of the phony righties on here down as being all in on bigger, more powerful federal government.

Thanks for clarifying, guys.
Click to expand...

Nice try douchey

Tell us what other issues you are a states rights guy on?

As usual poor Clingy Thingy tries to take one issue and conflate it into something else.

Supporting Sessions decision to do his job and uphold the law does not equate to agreeing with the law.

There are lots of laws I disagree with but I don't agree with those who are charged with upholding them going out on their own and ignoring them.

How can you be so stupid that you don't understand the difference?

Your thread is based on the pretense that you don't want Sessions doing his job. What other laws would you be ok with him ignoring? Civil rights laws? Would that sit right with you?

Your pithy little comments can't distract from the simple mindedness of your position

Don't like the laws? Change em through the legislature. Period

Now please go fuck yourself
 
Teflon Don said:
ROFLMAO

How dare he enforce federal law. What the fuck is he thinking. I think it is laughable that you are all of a sudden a champion of states rights.

Thanks for the chuckle


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Click to expand...

thanks for proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that you only support states rights when it fits your agenda you fuvking hypocrite.
 
Alice in Liberaland said:
Nice try douchey

Tell us what other issues you are a states rights guy on?

As usual poor Clingy Thingy tries to take one issue and conflate it into something else.

Supporting Sessions decision to do his job and uphold the law does not equate to agreeing with the law.

There are lots of laws I disagree with but I don't agree with those who are charged with upholding them going out on their own and ignoring them.

How can you be so stupid that you don't understand the difference?

Your thread is based on the pretense that you don't want Sessions doing his job. What other laws would you be ok with him ignoring? Civil rights laws? Would that sit right with you?

Your pithy little comments can't distract from the simple mindedness of your position

Don't like the laws? Change em through the legislature. Period

Now please go fuck yourself
Click to expand...

if you were pro states rights you would be opposed to Sessions and in favor of Santuary states you fucking hypocrite.

you are the one with no shoes, you and the laughing idiot as well
 
Rune said:
thanks for proving beyond a shadow of a doubt that you only support states rights when it fits your agenda you fuvking hypocrite.
Click to expand...

Hey fuckstick. Read the entire thread and think before you start regurgitating Thingy talking points.

Again for the less intelligent. Supporting Sessions in upholding the law isn't the same as supporting the law itself. Are you fuckers such limited thinkers you can't reconcile those positions?

Holy fuck and liberals claim they are so fucking brilliant.
 
Thing1 said:
He is such an idiot when it comes to pot. It is pretty dismaying that someone so clueless can be calling policy when it comes to this issue.

His views are basically '50's era, "Reefer Madness" paranoia. He makes claims such as marijuana leading to opioid addiction and being only "slightly less awful" than heroin that actually fly in the face of scientific evidence. Opioid addiction has gone down in states where medical marijuana is legal. And this is not surprising - if pot is prescribed for pain, it obviously gives patients and doctors an alternative to much more addicting and dangerous painkillers.

Now, he wants the ability to enforce federal laws on pot, and basically ignore states rights. It really makes me sick to think about. How can small-gov't, states rights conservatives support this?
Click to expand...

BTW as usual you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

If you want to get high fine. But don't hide behind this medical marijuana lie
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top