Trump rails against Clinton’s emails amid Russia firestorm:

evince said:
he did n t knw that the trump team had joined the russians in destroying the integrity of our elections


so its not a lie or even a mistake


it was an uninformed opinion


No one knew just how much the russians helpe trumpy.


that is still under investigation


when its done you will change your name and claim you were a never trump person
Click to expand...

Liar
 
Teflon Don said:
Hmmm except she was SoS you uninformed fuckstick
Click to expand...

You still lied about the crux of the matter you lying piece of shit.

In 2010, Hillary Clinton, as secretary of state, was one of nine federal agency heads to sign off on Russia’s purchase of a controlling stake in Uranium One, an international mining company headquartered in Canada with operations in several U.S. states. It was part of a regular process for approving international deals involving strategic assets, such as uranium, that could have implications for national security. Uranium One’s U.S. mines produced about 11 percent of the country’s total uranium production in 2014, according to Oilprice.com.

But even with its control of Uranium One, Russia cannot export the material from the United States. Russia was likely more interested in Uranium One’s assets in Kazakhstan, the world’s largest uranium producer.

As PolitiFact and others have detailed, some investors with an interest in making the Uranium One deal go through have a long-time relationship with Bill Clinton and have donated to the Clinton Foundation. But there’s no concrete evidence those relationships or donations helped make the deal go through. Most of the donations occurred before Hillary Clinton could have known she would become secretary of state. And again, the secretary of state was one of nine agency heads that had input into the final decision, which ultimately lay with President Barack Obama.
Click to expand...

http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/article/2017/mar/28/fact-checking-donald-trumps-tweets-about-hillary-c/
 
Thing1 said:
All he said was that it never happened before - factually 100% correct.
Click to expand...

And he was 100% wrong in his prediction.

I'm reminded of the old joke about a helicopter lost in the fog in Washington State with a malfunctioning radio.

The desperate pilot hovered next to a building, and when someone appeared at a window he wrote "where are we?" on a piece of cardboard.

The person in the building smiled, nodded, and held up a sign that read "you're in a helicopter".
 
LuvTrump said:
And he was 100% wrong in his prediction.

I'm reminded of the old joke about a helicopter lost in the fog in Washington State with a malfunctioning radio.

The desperate pilot hovered next to a building, and when someone appeared at a window he wrote "where are we?" on a piece of cardboard.

The person in the building smiled, nodded, and held up a sign that read "you're in a helicopter".
Click to expand...

I didn't see a prediction in the article.

What was his prediction?
 
The Christ Puncher said:
Nope I don't subscribe to that way of thinking.

THERE IS MORE THAN ONE REALITY. I have kept trying to hammer this in to your skull for months.

Half the country wanted the pussy grabber. That is an acceptable and presidential thing for trump to say.

Everything trump does is "presidential" , given he is a president. This president grabs pussy. This is an actual reality that you live in.
Click to expand...

In one "REALITY", 63 million are "half the country". In another reality they're barely a fifth.

In one "REALITY", whatever a president does is "presidential". In another, where standards aren't shrugged or frowned at, he's just a Vulgar Talking Yam who, by dint of an ancient Constitutional quirk, has been allowed into the highest office of the land, buyers' remorse and disgust by overwhelming majorities and all.

In one "REALITY", the trumpy is president. In another, his presidency is a shameful accident of history, hopefully jolting the population into reconsidering their relation to reality, namely, rejecting the alternative realities the rightarded propagandists promulgate to take advantage of the gullible goofs who make up most of the Trumpy's supporters and voters.
 
Last edited:
In "one Reality" vs another "reality" is an impossible term,
reality is reality, perceived or not perceived.

Trump is the president
Hillary deleted emails she neither ethically or legally should have, and she would have gotten away with it except for the little "she got defeated" reality partly because of it.

The Russian collusion witch hunt is based solely around the fact that some of the DNC emails were put out for everyone to see with the premise being Russia did it.
But that does not change the "reality" of what the f2ck does that have to do with Trump.
they weren't fake emails were they? no they were not.
 
LuvTrump said:
“No candidate has ever come back from this far behind,” ABC News anchor George Stephanopoulos declared Sunday on “This Week.”

You don't see a prediction that Trump would lose in that statement?
Click to expand...

Oh, wow - so you don't know what a prediction is then?

A prediction would be as follows: "Trump cannot come back from this far behind."

Saying "no candidate has ever come back from this far behind" is just a statement of fact. He's not predicting anything. He's talking about history, not the future.
 
Thing1 said:
Oh, wow - so you don't know what a prediction is then?

A prediction would be as follows: "Trump cannot come back from this far behind."

Saying "no candidate has ever come back from this far behind" is just a statement of fact. He's not predicting anything. He's talking about history, not the future.
Click to expand...

And he was discussing a poll concerning the 2016 presidential election, in which Trump polled badly. You can't infer a prediction from that?
 
LuvTrump said:
And he was discussing a poll concerning the 2016 presidential election, in which Trump polled badly. You can't infer a prediction from that?
Click to expand...

No. Because it's not a prediction, and doesn't even infer one.

In the Superbowl, the announcer said that no team had ever come back from a 28-3 deficit. That wasn't the announcer saying or inferring that the Patriots could not come back from that deficit - just that no one ever had.
 
Thing1 said:
That's like you saying that Hillary is dishonest, phony & shamelessly expedient, and me saying "that's just a different viewpoint - I think she's crafty and wonderfully evasive about her true intentions."

Sure, you can call it different POV's. But one is clearly tragic.
Click to expand...

yes, but we'll still let you post here.....we've become used to listening to the clearly tragic since Hilliary lost......
 
Thing1 said:
No. Because it's not a prediction, and doesn't even infer one.

In the Superbowl, the announcer said that no team had ever come back from a 28-3 deficit. That wasn't the announcer saying or inferring that the Patriots could not come back from that deficit - just that no one ever had.
Click to expand...

These fuckers are just willfully stupid.

It's the only way they can mount an argument.
 
Owl'd You're Up! said:
In one "REALITY", 63 million are "half the country". In another reality they're barely a fifth.

In one "REALITY", whatever a president does is "presidential". In another, where standards aren't shrugged or frowned at, he's just a Vulgar Talking Yam who, by dint of an ancient Constitutional quirk, has been allowed into the highest office of the land, buyers' remorse and disgust by overwhelming majorities and all.

In one "REALITY", the trumpy is president. In another, his presidency is a shameful accident of history, hopefully jolting the population into reconsidering their relation to reality, namely, rejecting the alternative realities the rightarded propagandists promulgate to take advantage of the gullible goofs who make up most of the Trumpy's supporters and voters.
Click to expand...

in all realities Trump won the election and demmycrats are sidelined till at least 2020.....
 
Nomad said:
Only if you have a not particularly intelligent 6th grader's, understanding of the word "presidential".

According to your strictly literal interpretation of the word, Trump could pull down his drawers and take a dump on the sidewalk in full public view, and simply by virtue of his title, that act would in your mind be, "presidential".

To most people with a more mature adult take on it, the word connotes acting in a way that is in keeping with the honor and dignity that has a long tradition of being associated with such a high office.

The fact that right-wingers don't understand that and have to have it explained to them like children, is emblematic of how and why a low rent, unworthy piece of trash like Trump got elected to begin with.

The political right is the ideology of tackiness, ignorance and trashiness.

And Donald Trump, along with his family, are the face of it.
Click to expand...

I understand your interpretation, but ultimately it's wishful thinking. We have to deal with the reality in front of us. Presidential is defined by the office and the officeholder.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top