"this thing is a bunch of nothing": Kucinich

You did not talk about republican obstructionism. I was there.

Didn't talk about it there .. don't talk about it here.

I entirely vouch for the accuracy of this post.

He entirely blamed Obama for not being able to work around the obstructionism.

He completely dismissed the power of the obstructionists.

to claim anything else is a bald faced lie.
 
Kucinich is an honest guy. He warned us not to go after Assad in Syria,and he tried to intervene on Obama's Libya destruction. for those alone he gets my respect/attention

Kucinich is a garden variety GOP,
a common thug with no morals, forsale to the highest bidder.

why are you So blindingly ignorant?
 
I entirely vouch for the accuracy of this post.

He entirely blamed Obama for not being able to work around the obstructionism.

He completely dismissed the power of the obstructionists.

to claim anything else is a bald faced lie.
you can't remember your first joint of the morning,muchless life on another board
 
you can't remember your first joint of the morning,muchless life on another board

I've asked you 3 times if you complained about obstructionism under Obama, and you have dodged it every time.

I've seen too many of your posts. It's not credible that you were vocal about it at the time.
 
Kucinich is a garden variety GOP,
a common thug with no morals, forsale to the highest bidder.

why are you So blindingly ignorant?
right. sure. that's why he desperately took phone calls from Qadaffi's son (when Hillary would not) to try to stop the destruction of Libya.
He warned us of the dangers of "Assad must go" -even to the point of going to Syria to interview Assad 2x.

idiot.
 
you can't remember your first joint of the morning,muchless life on another board

I remember everything motherfycker including how inept you were and how Darla told me you were too stupid to be a mod and how much you sucked at it.
 
I've asked you 3 times if you complained about obstructionism under Obama, and you have dodged it every time.

I've seen too many of your posts. It's not credible that you were vocal about it at the time.
since you weren't there -what's it to you? You've made up your mind so why ask me?
 
right. sure. that's why he desperately took phone calls from Qadaffi's son (when Hillary would not) to try to stop the destruction of Libya.
He warned us of the dangers of "Assad must go" -even to the point of going to Syria to interview Assad 2x.

idiot.

whatever stupid shitstain.
I have warned of the exact same danger s for many years and you called me stupid for it then too.

fuck off and die you staggeringly stupid piece of shit.
 
I remember everything motherfycker including how inept you were and how Darla told me you were too stupid to be a mod and how much you sucked at it.
we tried to run a relaxed mod. only rules.
everytime we did any modding you complained about uneven modding, or others would complain about too much modding, so i simply stopped wasting my time -having to explain every decision, and never even banning anyone
and started to move here more for the election.
one of you idiots posted nudity, or something, and I logged in one day to update Libyan Civil war 2014
and the board was shut down.

Darla was a part time mod at best. she's high strung and a PC nutcase, i don't take her criticism for anything but what it was.
 
since you weren't there -what's it to you? You've made up your mind so why ask me?

It bothers me. A few of you Trumpsters do the "2 wrongs don't make a right" thing.

It's meaningless unless you spoke up about it under Obama. It's just hacks wanting things to be different when their guy is in charge.
 
whatever stupid shitstain.
I have warned of the exact same danger s for many years and you called me stupid for it then too.

fuck off and die you staggeringly stupid piece of shit.
bullshit. you fucking liar. I was a non-interventionist back when you were applauding Clinton bombing of Kosovo and aspirin factories.

You are too stupid to understand Syria, and if you were actually opposed to Obmaa's/Hillary's "Assad must go" i would have applauded it.
 
It bothers me. A few of you Trumpsters do the "2 wrongs don't make a right" thing.

It's meaningless unless you spoke up about it under Obama. It's just hacks wanting things to be different when their guy is in charge.
If you follow this thread, you see where I value process?
Meaning not reconcilliation, and not executive orders. actual legislation and federalism

So why would I not oppose Republican obstructionism? I'm sure I criticized Obama's use of XO's
and I would Trump's too -except many have been simply to overturn Obama's XO's-
getting us back to prior legislation as law.

where Trump over-reaches and uses XO's instead of trying to shephard legislation -
you can mark me down as a critic too.
 
bullshit. you fucking liar. I was a non-interventionist back when you were applauding Clinton bombing of Kosovo and aspirin factories.

You are too stupid to understand Syria, and if you were actually opposed to Obmaa's/Hillary's "Assad must go" i would have applauded it.

no you lying cunt.

my position has always been opposed to any action in the ME

Bar nothing.

nothing.

they eat their own, let them you ignorant fool.
they will never change, you can never change them.

nothing you do there will ever succeed.

you are an idiot and your path is pointless folly.
 
no you lying cunt.

my position has always been opposed to any action in the ME

Bar nothing.

nothing.

they eat their own, let them you ignorant fool.
they will never change, you can never change them.

nothing you do there will ever succeed.

you are an idiot and your path is pointless folly.
"Assad must go"didn't mean interventionism like in Iraq/Libya.

It was supporting proxies like the FSA and so called "non-Islamists" to go after Jabhat Fateh al-Sham( al-Nusra)
Hezbollah ,and Iranian Qods /Shi'a militias.

If you were against "going into Syria" like pure inteverventionism -good for you.
I might have dismissed your position as too facile, but at least it was better then Hillary's meddling
( Friend's of Syria)
 
If you follow this thread, you see where I value process?
Meaning not reconcilliation, and not executive orders. actual legislation and federalism

So why would I not oppose Republican obstructionism? I'm sure I criticized Obama's use of XO's
and I would Trump's too -except many have been simply to overturn Obama's XO's-
getting us back to prior legislation as law.

where Trump over-reaches and uses XO's instead of trying to shephard legislation -
you can mark me down as a critic too.

Great non-answer answer.

You'd make a good politician.
 
Great non-answer answer.
You'd make a good politician.
if i simply said no (again) you don't believe me,and when I try to show you the logic ( consistency) of my positions you blow it off as a non-answer.
so like I said the first time,you've made up your mind -so why even ask me again?
 
Process delivers settled law rather then oscillations of executive orders.
It' also representative, rather then imposed by reconcilliation or exeutive order
++
I criticize BOTH parties as being worthless, self serving, plutocratic Swamp Critters.

If you seriously think either the establishment Dem's or Republicans have your best interests at heart-
instead of what they can do for themselves to remain in power -you've completely lost all perspective.
You've thrown out your own past views of the futility of partisanship to deliver results for the populace.

They are all corrupt to the core -both partys - selling out to special interests and th highest bidder
through the Revolving Door.

Does any of this jog your memory?
or has Trump Derangement Syndrome so effected you, you forgotten your core ideals?

.... point me to your like criticisms of the Republican Party here on this board. Just saying "both parties are corrupt" while you only attack democrats has no meaning .. especially when you're the biggest Trump supporter on this board. There is nothing he can do wrong that you won't find an excuse for.

This is not a personal attack on you .. but there is no integrity in your claim to be non-partisan when you post the way that you do.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is just some childish bullshit made up by people who can't stand criticism of the worst fucking president in history.
 
.... point me to your like criticisms of the Republican Party here on this board. Just saying "both parties are corrupt" while you only attack democrats has no meaning .. especially when you're the biggest Trump supporter on this board. There is nothing he can do wrong that you won't find an excuse for.

This is not a personal attack on you .. but there is no integrity in your claim to be non-partisan when you post the way that you do.

Trump Derangement Syndrome is just some childish bullshit made up by people who can't stand criticism of the worst fucking president in history.
Republicans have done so little it's hard to point to anything.
I don't like either the Democratic HC plan OR the Republican plan -both are budget busters, with Medicade expansion not paid for. Only Sp or perhaps a viable Public Option is cost effective, and universal coverage.
Rand Paul want nothing.going back to where we weer before Obamacare isn't an answer either.

I haven't even criticized the Dems under Trump except for the insane Russiaphobia that is the cause for nothing getting done. Tatand of course their loathsome identity politics,and wacky PC which they always carry.

The Dem's et all, and the Republican goofball warmongers like McCain and Graham all get my disdain.

I hate the status quo -the so called Swamp. ( that is the entire DC establishment-including the Deep State)
Neither the Republicans or the Dems give a damn about we the people. All they care about is power acquisition
and when not in elected office, they are sucked into the Revolving Door cushy high paying lobbying

Just as you hate Trump, I think he's got a good agenda. I'm no fan of Trump the man (egotistical bloviation)
But economic nationalism is well past overdue -it's how most of the world operates.
No funky Paris Accords subsidizing India and Chinese coal plants. instead let everyone compete from where they are

TDS is a cheap shot, but so is calling me a Republican. If Trump ran as a Democrat under the same platform I'd vote for him there too. He has superior ideas for international competition. His foreign policy has already paid off dividends in Syria,and his desire to negotiate w/Putin is the best way to cut Cold War 2 spending

I'm even for tax reform, although it will skew to the rich. Because unlike Bernie whom I really admire
for his emphasis on income inequality, the best way to remedy that is to grow the GDP.
<2% under Obama does not cut it
" a rising tide lifts all boats"
 
bullshit. you fucking liar. I was a non-interventionist back when you were applauding Clinton bombing of Kosovo and aspirin factories.

You are too stupid to understand Syria, and if you were actually opposed to Obmaa's/Hillary's "Assad must go" i would have applauded it.

shut up tou lying cunt.
I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN A PACIFIST.
MY RECORD IS CLEAR You NOT SO MUCH
 
Back
Top