"this thing is a bunch of nothing": Kucinich

blackascoal said:
Then you listen to him .. democrats won't on this.

Trump's agenda has been halted, republicans are getting real uneasy about trying to defend him every day .. tired of his antics .. and if you had any confidence that nothing was done wrong, you wouldn't be here whining about this everyday. But you don't. Like Dennis, you have no clue how deep this goes.

This investigation will continue until it's done. Get used to it.
Click to expand...
The investigation goes where it will, I don't think you are paying attention to all the Congressional one's though.
The House is a fishing expedition, the Seante won't look at the IC leaks -maybe Meuller will.

I find the resistance as horrible as Obstructionism; and I recall all the Dem's complaining about that
doing the same thing -or worse.

That is not how our government needs to run, without compromise nothing gets done.
What i find amazing is that people of both partys find this acceptable.

worse is obstructionism by hijacking the press for daily noise - fake news
 
anatta said:
The investigation goes where it will, I don't think you are paying attention to all the Congressional one's though.
The House is a fishing expedition, the Seante won't look at the IC leaks -maybe Meuller will.

I find the resistance as horrible as Obstructionism; and I recall all the Dem's complaining about that
doing the same thing -or worse.

That is not how our government needs to run, without compromise nothing gets done.
What i find amazing is that people of both partys find this acceptable.

worse is obstructionism by hijacking the press for daily noise - fake news
Click to expand...

Do you think you'd be able to find one thread during the Obama admin where you decried GOP obstructionism?
 
anatta said:
The investigation goes where it will, I don't think you are paying attention to all the Congressional one's though.
The House is a fishing expedition, the Seante won't look at the IC leaks -maybe Meuller will.

I find the resistance as horrible as Obstructionism; and I recall all the Dem's complaining about that
doing the same thing -or worse.

That is not how our government needs to run, without compromise nothing gets done.
What i find amazing is that people of both partys find this acceptable.

worse is obstructionism by hijacking the press for daily noise - fake news
Click to expand...

Please point me to your objections about obstructionism during the Obama years.

If you can't .. and I know that you can't .. it won't be a surprise.

A question I asked that you never answered .. After what republicans did during the Obama years, how is it that republicans believe that they have ANY moral standing on what democrats do to Trump?

How do you even fix your face to talk about "compromise" and obstructionism?

Neither the Republican Party nor you have any standing 0n either.
 
blackascoal said:
Please point me to your objections about obstructionism during the Obama years.

If you can't .. and I know that you can't .. it won't be a surprise.

A question I asked that you never answered .. After what republicans did during the Obama years, how is it that republicans believe that they have ANY moral standing on what democrats do to Trump?

How do you even fix your face to talk about "compromise" and obstructionism?

Neither the Republican Party nor you have any standing 0n either.
Click to expand...
that was DCJ -how can I point to it? I've answered you many times on this.
2 wrongs do not make a right,and it's manifest we can't get anything done under either Obama or Trump

( which is why all the XO's under Obama, and Trump)
It's not good,or even decent governing , and those who do this should be called out -of either party
 
anatta said:
that was DCJ -how can I point to it? I've answered you many times on this.
2 wrongs do not make a right,and it's manifest we can't get anything done under either Obama or Trump

( which is why all the XO's under Obama, and Trump)
It's not good,or even decent governing , and those who do this should be called out -of either party
Click to expand...

You never posted about it. There or here.
 
anatta said:
that was DCJ -how can I point to it? I've answered you many times on this.
2 wrongs do not make a right,and it's manifest we can't get anything done under either Obama or Trump

( which is why all the XO's under Obama, and Trump)
It's not good,or even decent governing , and those who do this should be called out -of either party
Click to expand...

IT'S CALLED HYPOCRISY .. which is exactly what you're posting.

You didn't call out republicans because you are a republican .. and your attempts to call out democrats is pure hypocrisy .. and people who engage in that should be called out for what they are.

I repeat .. you have no standing to call out democrats for whatever they do.
 
blackascoal said:
‘Lie after lie after lie’: Fox News’s Shepard Smith has a Cronkite moment on Russia

Shepard Smith is no stranger to challenging the administration and occasionally launching into personal editorials — including one about refugees back in 2015. But on Friday afternoon, he took it a step further, repeatedly accusing the administration of lying, deception and a coverup.

After reporting that there appeared to be more people in that meeting with Russian lawyer than previously acknowledged, Smith had either a Howard Beale or a Walter Cronkite moment, depending on your perspective, and he lit into the White House.

We’re still not clean on this, Chris [Wallace]. If there’s nothing there — and that’s what they tell us, they tell us there’s nothing to this and nothing came of it, there’s a nothingburger, it wasn’t even memorable, didn’t write it down, didn’t tell you about it, because it wasn’t anything so I didn’t even remember it — with a Russian interpreter in the room at Trump Tower? If all of that, why all these lies? Why is it lie after lie after lie? If you clean, come on clean, you know? My grandmother used to say when first we practice to — Oh what a tangled web we weave when first we practice to deceive. The deception, Chris, is mind-boggling. And there are still people who are out there who believe we’re making it up. And one day they’re gonna realize we’re not and look around and go, Where are we, and why are we getting told all these lies?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...kite-moment-on-russia/?utm_term=.9d0355102aba

Mr. Kucinich <slapping his face> .. wake the fuck up.
Click to expand...
When I see the left quoting Smith and Krauthammer that tells me that maybe Fox News is the most objective.
 
blackascoal said:
IT'S CALLED HYPOCRISY .. which is exactly what you're posting.

You didn't call out republicans because you are a republican .. and your attempts to call out democrats is pure hypocrisy .. and people who engage in that should be called out for what they are.

I repeat .. you have no standing to call out democrats for whatever they do.
Click to expand...
ridiculous.
I really hate when people call me a liar -but you at least should know how much I value process
as much as outcomes. Process in this case meaning legislating and not governing by executive orders.

Does that ring a bell?

PS . when did you become a Democrat? I've asked you before and you've dodged it.
You can call me a Republican all day long. I'm non-partisan wiling to look at good ideas no matter who puts them up.
I find Trump's populism a superior idea. The dems have no ideas.
 
aloysious said:
When I see the left quoting Smith and Krauthammer that tells me that maybe Fox News is the most objective.
Click to expand...

So should we assume that republicans are liberals because they quote Dennis Kucinich?

Or, should I assume that like most things political, one side uses the arguments of the other side to make a point.

Fox News remains the other side and far from being objective at all.
 
aloysious said:
Two more than CNN and MSNBC together.
Click to expand...

Oh, please. To call Charles Krauthhammer "objective" is false just on its face, anyway. He's not SUPPOSED to be objective. He is there for opinion and is a proud conservative. The fact that he recognizes this for what it is just shows that he isn't under Trump's spell like most.
 
Thing1 said:
Oh, please. To call Charles Krauthhammer "objective" is false just on its face, anyway. He's not SUPPOSED to be objective. He is there for opinion and is a proud conservative. The fact that he recognizes this for what it is just shows that he isn't under Trump's spell like most.
Click to expand...

Krauthammer is one of the most unbiased columnists you can read.
 
Sailor said:
Krauthammer is one of the most unbiased columnists you can read.
Click to expand...

You're confusing truthful w/ unbiased.

Even he wouldn't say he's "unbiased." He's a conservative. He presents the conservative POV. This isn't even a discussion - he's an opinion guy, and that's what Fox has him on there for. He's not a reporter.
 
Thing1 said:
Oh, please. To call Charles Krauthhammer "objective" is false just on its face, anyway. He's not SUPPOSED to be objective. He is there for opinion and is a proud conservative. The fact that he recognizes this for what it is just shows that he isn't under Trump's spell like most.
Click to expand...
So you're saying he's objective. And he's a Fox News commentator.
 
Thing1 said:
Do you think you posted about it there?

You were here for awhile during the Obama tenure and I never saw anything here.
Click to expand...
i talked almost all camapign stuff here.. This was DCJ#1 -when my group of internet refugees landed on DCJ
 
anatta said:
ridiculous.
I really hate when people call me a liar -but you at least should know how much I value process
as much as outcomes. Process in this case meaning legislating and not governing by executive orders.

Does that ring a bell?

PS . when did you become a Democrat? I've asked you before and you've dodged it.
You can call me a Republican all day long. I'm non-partisan wiling to look at good ideas no matter who puts them up.
I find Trump's populism a superior idea. The dems have no ideas.
Click to expand...

What you're posting is hypocrisy pure and simple no matter how much you value process .. a process that you did not adhere to when Obama was president.

I don't dodge and I've answered your question before.

I became a democrat when Trump became president. There are only two parties in the US who have any chance of electing a president, and I no longer have the luxury of wasting my vote on a 3rd party that will never be relevant. My protest vote.

The fight has to take place within the Democratic Party to fight the ignorance and hate that is the Republican Party.

Hope that helps.

Trump's populism is just a bunch of bullshit that he sold you.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top