Obama Wiretapped Trump: Step by Step

I'll say two things about this affair that I'm pretty confident about:

One, is it was a sting operation [which raises a whole raft of questions hardly anyone in the media is curious about].

Two, we don't know the whole story.

We don't know the story......but it was a "sting operation"......how accommodating of the Marks to repeatedly lie about it, eh?
 
I'll say two things about this affair that I'm pretty confident about:

One, is it was a sting operation [which raises a whole raft of questions hardly anyone in the media is curious about].

Two, we don't know the whole story.

Why does it matter if it was? Those who get stung are no less guilty, are they?
 
Why does it matter if it was? Those who get stung are no less guilty, are they?

Nope. But the extent of Junior's guilt is being magnified beyond reason---for partisan political purposes. Not too many politicians on the national level would have turned down that meeting. [maybe a Cruz?]

It was kind of amateur hour with Junior. He's probably too naive to know about plausible deniability. What you do, is send a political operative that's not formally associated with the campaign. Like the DNC did in getting their foreign dirt on Trump. That way, all the important players keep their noses clean.

National politics is a dirty business and everyone knows it.

But that leads us to the 'why' question. Why would someone be motivated to entice Junior into collusion under false pretenses? Who is it that is looking for evidence of collusion?

The Russian lawyer was allowed into the country by some of the same players who were involved in the unmasking of Trump's associates.

The same names keep popping up. And you know what else? If these suspicions have merit, it is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate.
 
Nope. But the extent of Junior's guilt is being magnified beyond reason---for partisan political purposes. Not too many politicians on the national level would have turned down that meeting. [maybe a Cruz?]

It was kind of amateur hour with Junior. He's probably too naive to know about plausible deniability. What you do, is send a political operative that's not formally associated with the campaign. Like the DNC did in getting their foreign dirt on Trump. That way, all the important players keep their noses clean.

National politics is a dirty business and everyone knows it.

But that leads us to the 'why' question. Why would someone be motivated to entice Junior into collusion under false pretenses? Who is it that is looking for evidence of collusion?

The Russian lawyer was allowed into the country by some of the same players who were involved in the unmasking of Trump's associates.

The same names keep popping up. And you know what else? If these suspicions have merit, it is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate.

yep..and Meullar will not investigate it ,or the IC leaks or anything else not damaging to Trump or helping his buddy Comey
He's hiring up a hit squad of liberal lawyers.
 
Nope. But the extent of Junior's guilt is being magnified beyond reason---for partisan political purposes. Not too many politicians on the national level would have turned down that meeting. [maybe a Cruz?]

It was kind of amateur hour with Junior. He's probably too naive to know about plausible deniability. What you do, is send a political operative that's not formally associated with the campaign. Like the DNC did in getting their foreign dirt on Trump. That way, all the important players keep their noses clean.

National politics is a dirty business and everyone knows it.

But that leads us to the 'why' question. Why would someone be motivated to entice Junior into collusion under false pretenses? Who is it that is looking for evidence of collusion?

The Russian lawyer was allowed into the country by some of the same players who were involved in the unmasking of Trump's associates.

The same names keep popping up. And you know what else? If these suspicions have merit, it is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate.

Don't forget that Hillary actually colluded with Ukraines.
 
Don't forget that Hillary actually colluded with Ukraines.

Well, I didn't forget them actually. I just didn't mention them by name.

The DNC sent an operative not formally associated with the DNC to the Ukrainian embassy[!] to get dirt on Flynn. It's the same game---democrats are just better at it.

Probably from more practice lol.
 
The Russian lawyer was allowed into the country by some of the same players who were involved in the unmasking of Trump's associates.

The same names keep popping up. And you know what else? If these suspicions have merit, it is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate.

The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

anatta (Today)

You paranoid crackpots are fun to watch. Nah, not really.

Veselnitskaya was let into the country since she represented a Russian client, Prevezon Holdings Ltd., before a U.S. court. The company was investigated by Bharara for a complex tax fraud scheme to the tune of $230 million. Then the Trumpy fired Bharara, and, mysteriously, the case was settled for just under $6 million shortly before the trial was scheduled to begin without any admission of wrongdoing. And yes, Veselnitskaya, Prevezon's attorney, is the same attorney who promised "dirt" on Hillary to lil' Donnie, but didn't deliver - or so the two sides declare - but someone at the DoJ seemingly did deliver for Veselnitskaya and Prevezon.

Funny how that goes, isn't it?

And no, Rice did not "unmask[] Trump's associates". She asked that folks showing up in suspicious communications with Russians be unmasked, and it turned out these folks were "Trump's associates". Read as often as necessary to understand the distinction.
 
The Following User Says Thank You to Darth Omar For This Post:

anatta (Today)

You paranoid crackpots are fun to watch. Nah, not really.

Veselnitskaya was let into the country since she represented a Russian client, Prevezon Holdings Ltd., before a U.S. court. The company was investigated by Bharara for a complex tax fraud scheme to the tune of $230 million. Then the Trumpy fired Bharara, and, mysteriously, the case was settled for just under $6 million shortly before the trial was scheduled to begin without any admission of wrongdoing. And yes, Veselnitskaya, Prevezon's attorney, is the same attorney who promised "dirt" on Hillary to lil' Donnie, but didn't deliver - or so the two sides declare - but someone at the DoJ seemingly did deliver for Veselnitskaya and Prevezon.

Funny how that goes, isn't it?

And no, Rice did not "unmask[] Trump's associates". She asked that folks showing up in suspicious communications with Russians be unmasked, and it turned out these folks were "Trump's associates". Read as often as necessary to understand the distinction.

They kind of had their 'suspicious communications' pretext after the meeting took place.

How convenient.
 
They kind of had their 'suspicious communications' pretext after the meeting took place.

How convenient.

what people dont want to acknowledge is that people in intelligence circles already knowexactly who is in the transcripts. They were the one who did the wiretapping in the first place. You unmask stuff so that the names appear in the official documents.
 
Nope. But the extent of Junior's guilt is being magnified beyond reason---for partisan political purposes. Not too many politicians on the national level would have turned down that meeting. [maybe a Cruz?]

It was kind of amateur hour with Junior. He's probably too naive to know about plausible deniability. What you do, is send a political operative that's not formally associated with the campaign. Like the DNC did in getting their foreign dirt on Trump. That way, all the important players keep their noses clean.

National politics is a dirty business and everyone knows it.

But that leads us to the 'why' question. Why would someone be motivated to entice Junior into collusion under false pretenses? Who is it that is looking for evidence of collusion?

The Russian lawyer was allowed into the country by some of the same players who were involved in the unmasking of Trump's associates.

The same names keep popping up. And you know what else? If these suspicions have merit, it is WAY, WAY bigger than Watergate.

Your hairbrained conspiratorial bullshit belongs in some fruitcake forum, not here. But I understand. You try to concoct this kind of bullshit to divert from the absolute stupidity and incompetence of your boys. Not to worry, fool. Mueller has this baby and I'm sure he isn't tracking your opinion.

And yeah, moron, those stung in a sting setup are JUST AS GUILTY as those fucking up like Donnyboy and the other two stooges. You're just not bright enough to realize that.
 
Back
Top