read the thread.. I mentioned the EC reflects the make-up of Congress,, do you really think I mean that ACTUAL LAND votes -or the fact that states ( being land) get 2 electors just for being states??
argumentum without purpose.
We aren't responsible for your faulty word choice. The concept of land voting is not divorced from the discussion. That is the historical justification and it is evolution away from the concept from which we have emerged. So it's no stretch to assume you meant exactly what you said. Just take a historical survey of feudal and monarchical systems and the meaning of land with respect to rights, and fast that forward to American history including who gained suffrage.
The ec and the senate are indeed hangovers, unjust and useless vestigial political appendages harkening back to the dinosaur thinking you and your ilk admire.