Desperate liberals cling to the Trump-Russian narrative

Naw, nothing to hide. Just denied meeting Russians three separate times and only admitted to the meetings when confronted with the evidence.

Infowars? This is why you retain the title of Forum Dumbfuck #1

Dear shit-for-brains; please provide the statute that says that one cannot meet with private citizens to discuss potential damaging information about one's political opponents. Dunce.

As for hiding; unlike Shrillery, he handed over the entire e-mail string. If only the corrupt cheating Democrats could do that much without needing the hack from Wikileaks eh dumbfuck? :rofl2:
 
How's that drainy swampy thing goin' for you guys, anyway?

There's a LOT of swamp to drain ThingTard; fascinating that you loony lefties want to keep the swamp filled. But then, you losers are not a very smart lot.

Tired of winning yet?

Tired of losing yet? That was a rhetorical question because you're too brain dead to comprehend that you are losing and making stupid specious predictions.
 
Dear shit-for-brains; please provide the statute that says that one cannot meet with private citizens to discuss potential damaging information about one's political opponents. Dunce.

As for hiding; unlike Shrillery, he handed over the entire e-mail string. If only the corrupt cheating Democrats could do that much without needing the hack from Wikileaks eh dumbfuck? :rofl2:

11CFR110.20 dumbfuck

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/11/110.20
 
Naw, nothing to hide. Just denied meeting Russians three separate times and only admitted to the meetings when confronted with the evidence.

Infowars? This is why you retain the title of Forum Dumbfuck #1
So what did that evidence produce, you screaming faggot? Exactly. Not a damn thing.

I'd have denied meeting the Russians too, just to send you stupid fuckers down a rabbit hole. LOL!!

No, 76 IQ, YOU are the dumbfuck. You're also the village idiot, and the forum's slobbering basement gimp. ;)
 
Back
Top