Senate Report: WH Facing 'Unprecedented Wave' of Media Leaks

anatta

100% recycled karma
The Trump administration has faced an average of one leak per day to news organizations during its first 126 days — "seven times faster" than the Obama and George W. Bush administrations combined — that have been "potentially damaging" to national security, according to a new Senate report released Thursday.

Seventy-eight of the leaks concerned investigations into Russian involvement during the November election and issues of possible collusion with the Trump campaign, according to the report.

"To ensure the security of our country’s most sensitive information, federal law enforcement officials ought to thoroughly investigate leaks of potentially sensitive information flowing at an alarming rate," the document's executive summary said.

The 24-page report was developed by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee, chaired by Wisconsin Republican Sen. Ron Johnson.

It was submitted to Attorney General Jeff Sessions and calls on the nation's law enforcement agencies to increase their investigations into such breaches.

The document — "State Secrets: How an Avalanche of Media Leaks is Harming National Security" — cited an "unprecedented wave" of "alarming" and "potentially damaging" leaks to media organizations.

Johnson noted in a letter to Sessions with the report that "if anything," the document constituted only a "conservative estimate" of the number of leaks during the Trump administration.

According to the report, President Donald Trump's White House experienced one leak per day in news reports between his inauguration on Jan. 20 and May 25, his 126th day in office.

The nature of the breaches were measured based on standards specified in a 2009 executive order signed by then-President Barack Obama.

"Articles published by a range of national news organizations between Jan. 20 and May 25, 2017, included at least 125 stories with leaked information potentially damaging to national security," according to the summary.

Additionally, the leaks were "potential violations of federal law, punishable by jail time.

"It is also apparent that the arguments often used to justify leaks are at odds with the Trump administration — that leakers are bringing to light potential illegality, unwise policies, or concerns about the President’s temperament — have no legal basis," the report noted.

According to the document, 78 leaks were connected to the Russia probe, disclosing information intercepted by the intelligence community, interviews conducted by the FBI — as well as grand jury subpoenas, and "the workings of a secret surveillance court."

However, the report concluded that "no single law governs unauthorized disclosures," though it cited possible violations of the U.S. Espionage Act, which could bring maximum penalties of 10 years in prison.

In his letter, Johnson told Sessions that the Justice Department bared the "responsibility" of deciding whether the leaks justified criminal prosecution.

"By necessity, this examination was not comprehensive, and it required some judgment calls on which leaks constituted potential damage to national security," Johnson said.
http://www.newsmax.com/Politics/senate-report-white-house-unprecedented/2017/07/06/id/800203/
 
It actually explains a lot that your visit the hyperpartisan, rightwing Newsmax.com.

A website that was a well known apologist for Neoconservatism, war mongering, George Dumbya Bush worshipping, and Iraq War cheerleading.
 
It actually explains a lot that your visit the hyperpartisan, rightwing Newsmax.com.

A website that was a well known apologist for Neoconservatism, war mongering, George Dumbya Bush worshipping, and Iraq War cheerleading.

It's from a Senate report!
sad goat.jpg
 
Dumb people.

You walk into office with spit spewing from your mouth attacking the media, judges, courts, and the entire intelligence community .. among others.

Then you act all surprised when everyone hates you and are anxious to tell what they know.

Never figured out that you may need these people. huh?

:0) dumb people.
 
Dumb people.

You walk into office with spit spewing from your mouth attacking the media, judges, courts, and the entire intelligence community .. among others.

Then you act all surprised when everyone hates you and are anxious to tell what they know.

Never figured out that you may need these people. huh?

:0) dumb people.

Yes, we definitely need more play for pay and greased-palm arse-smooching hypocrites to still be in the WH.
 
Dumb people.

You walk into office with spit spewing from your mouth attacking the media, judges, courts, and the entire intelligence community .. among others.

Then you act all surprised when everyone hates you and are anxious to tell what they know.

Never figured out that you may need these people. huh?

:0) dumb people.

Substantive positions aside, that's why I was sure he would not be elected. Surely people that hate an entrenched bureaucracy know that it exists! So they think they can airdrop an sole antagonist on the rose garden and shit will go swimmingly?

Dumb dumb dumb.
 
Yes, we definitely need more play for pay and greased-palm arse-smooching hypocrites to still be in the WH.

Oh fuck off. You think he ran on fraud waste and abuse? And you think a fraud megalomaniacal dimwit real estate casino TV clown is the cure? Bullshit.

We need substance, he is the worst froth ever.
 
Yes, we definitely need more play for pay and greased-palm arse-smooching hypocrites to still be in the WH.

:0) Wait .. are you serious?

Tell me this is satire before I bombard you with greasy-palmed ass kissing swamp dwellers who now occupy the White House.
 
Substantive positions aside, that's why I was sure he would not be elected. Surely people that hate an entrenched bureaucracy know that it exists! So they think they can airdrop an sole antagonist on the rose garden and shit will go swimmingly?

Dumb dumb dumb.

NOBODY thought we were that dumb.

Lesson: Never underestimate the depths of American ignorance.

Truth be told .. there was one word missing from the analysis .. 'white.'

That put Trump over the top and made the absurdity of it almost invisible.
 
NOBODY thought we were that dumb.

Lesson: Never underestimate the depths of American ignorance.

Truth be told .. there was one word missing from the analysis .. 'white.'

That put Trump over the top and made the absurdity of it almost invisible.
this has nothing to do with "white". It's not even the Deep State by and large from the Senate Report
It seems to be mostly from Obama holdovers.

Obama has a 3rd force left in there led by Ben Rhodes.
 
It actually explains a lot that your visit the hyperpartisan, rightwing Newsmax.com.

A website that was a well known apologist for Neoconservatism, war mongering, George Dumbya Bush worshipping, and Iraq War cheerleading.

kneejerk_small.jpg
 
this has nothing to do with "white". ..

LMFAO. I offer as counter evidence the fact that about 5 of the 10 regular conservative posters who agree with you on everything and who most certainly voted for Dump, have one other trait you may lack, they are card carrying unapologetic white racists. You can honestly sit there and say blowback from Obama and a dog whistling nationalist pro cop law an order shout down protester demagogic Mexican hating whiter than white old man didn't light a fire under the racists? That this did not enter into their thinking? He simply blew by 5 or so better more respected candidates that, even if secretly racist, didn't do any of that shit?

Get outta town.
 
Trump: Jake, if he was giving me fair rulings, I wouldn't be talking to you this way. He's given me horrible rulings.

Tapper: But I don't care if you criticize him. That's fine. You can criticize every decision. What I'm saying is, if you invoke his race as a reason why he can't do his job ...

Trump: I think that's why he's doing it.

Tapper: But ...

Trump: I think that's why he's doing it.
 
Senate Report: WH Facing 'Unprecedented Wave' of Media Leaks

Laughable. This isn't a "Senate report", as in, a report by the U.S. Senate. It's a "report" by Sen. Johnson's staff.

And, while the report hyperventilates about "national security", you find snippy remarks like ...

Many stories presented President Trump in a negative and often harsh light, with some seemingly designed to embarrass the administration. For example, a Mother Jones article detailed a memo telling intelligence analysts to keep President Trump’s daily briefings short and to avoid nuance; ²³ a Reuters piece reported on how the National Security Council frequently puts his name in briefings so he will keep reading; ²⁴ and The Washington Post wrote a story on how the President “badgered, bragged and abruptly ended” a phone call with the Australian Prime Minister.​

... "a negative and often harsh light". Chuckle. Then the whining starts for real:

While the leaks in all of these stories could be harmful to national security and are thus prohibited by law, none depicted President Obama in a negative light.

Ha, infamy!

Oh yeah, don't forget to scroll through the appendix so as to find all those stories so egregiously damaging to national security... make that NATIONAL SECURITY!!!!!!

Like:

"Trump asked intelligence chiefs to push back against FBI collusion probe..."

"Russia probe looking at official in Trump White House"

"Comey now believes Trump was trying to influence him, source says"

"White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation"​

... and that's just from the first page.

Hilarity. "Mommy, they've been saying harsh things about the Trumpy... er, the Dear Leader. Can we put them in jail for that while still pretending we care for transparency, accountability, and a vibrant press? Perhaps if we howl a little louder about 'national security'?"

Yeah, the good Sen. Johnson kept his taxpayer funded staff busy to demonstrate his fealty to the Trumpy, and gets some attention in the rightarded press for his kabuki theater. Authoritarian submissives are a hoot.
.
 
Senate Report: WH Facing 'Unprecedented Wave' of Media Leaks

Laughable. This isn't a "Senate report", as in, a report by the U.S. Senate. It's a "report" by Sen. Johnson's staff.

And, while the report hyperventilates about "national security", you find snippy remarks like ...

Many stories presented President Trump in a negative and often harsh light, with some seemingly designed to embarrass the administration. For example, a Mother Jones article detailed a memo telling intelligence analysts to keep President Trump’s daily briefings short and to avoid nuance; ²³ a Reuters piece reported on how the National Security Council frequently puts his name in briefings so he will keep reading; ²⁴ and The Washington Post wrote a story on how the President “badgered, bragged and abruptly ended” a phone call with the Australian Prime Minister.​

... "a negative and often harsh light". Chuckle. Then the whining starts for real:

While the leaks in all of these stories could be harmful to national security and are thus prohibited by law, none depicted President Obama in a negative light.

Ha, infamy!

Oh yeah, don't forget to scroll through the appendix so as to find all those stories so egregiously damaging to national security... make that NATIONAL SECURITY!!!!!!

Like:

"Trump asked intelligence chiefs to push back against FBI collusion probe..."

"Russia probe looking at official in Trump White House"

"Comey now believes Trump was trying to influence him, source says"

"White House looking at ethics rule to weaken special investigation"​

... and that's just from the first page.

Hilarity. "Mommy, they've been saying harsh things about the Trumpy... er, the Dear Leader. Can we put them in jail for that while still pretending we care for transparency, accountability, and a vibrant press? Perhaps if we howl a little louder about 'national security'?"

Yeah, the good Sen. Johnson kept his taxpayer funded staff busy to demonstrate his fealty to the Trumpy, and gets some attention in the rightarded press for his kabuki theater. Authoritarian submissives are a hoot.
.

but seriously, wouldn't it have been better for everyone involved if the stories the lib'rul press reported had been true?........
 
Back
Top