Restoring Self Respect in America

Getin the ring said:
undoing the Obama job killing regulations, the handcuffs being put on our law enforcement, the sanctuary mentality being given to people here illegally

the 'lesson' we learned is what happens when you put a completely unqualified person in the WH simply because he is black and want to make some sort of "we shall overcome" statement with the most sacred of positions in our governance

we will know we have 'arrived' when our children are treated fairly on the basis of merit, when our authority figures are free to protect us without fear of the PC police, when our youth can find decent jobs, when I buy my healthcare and you buy yours, (imagine) but if you truly can't the system is there for you, temporarily until you stand up again.
Click to expand...


"Job killing"?

What percentage of ALL net private sector payroll growth, in the period 2/2001 to 2/2017, were realized after Feb 2009?


Looking at all 4 year terms, whose were the highest in terms of private sector employment growth?

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2017/02/public-and-private-sector-payroll-jobs.html

remember what I've told you....

When you know nothing, you'll believe anything....
 
cawacko said:
Bush was a big gov't conservative. If you know so much about the origins of Supply Side then you would know W wasn't one. Clinton cut capital gains taxes. Did that make him a supply sider?
Click to expand...

I can see where this is heading.......you don't have any idea what you are yapping about.....

W CERTAINLY was a "Supply Sider"......he remains one having lent his name to the 4% Growth Institute (or whatever he calls that grift)......it is pure SS hokum.

Reducing tax rates does not make one a Supply Sider......your ignorance is showing...it is also a prescription favored by Keynesians, under some conditions.
 
blackvegetable said:
I can see where this is heading.......you don't have any idea what you are yapping about.....

W CERTAINLY was a "Supply Sider"......he remains one having lent his name to the 4% Growth Institute (or whatever he calls that grift)......it is pure SS hokum.

Reducing tax rates does not make one a Supply Sider......your ignorance is showing...it is also a prescription favored by Keynesians, under some conditions.
Click to expand...

There's rhetoric and then there's action. Bush spoke as if he was a supply sider. His 2003 tax cuts were supply side in nature. But he was not a committed supply sider.

Keynesians like tax cuts such the one's Obama did during the stimulus. Short term payroll taxes in Obama's case. Not long term lowering of rates
 
cawacko said:
There's rhetoric and then there's action. Bush spoke as if he was a supply sider. His 2003 tax cuts were supply side in nature. But he was not a committed supply sider.

Keynesians like tax cuts such the one's Obama did during the stimulus. Short term payroll taxes in Obama's case. Not long term lowering of rates
Click to expand...


He ran as one, and governed as one........where do you believe his policies diverged from The True Path?

Keynesians believe that tax cuts have a place in fiscal policy....by nature such remedies are short term.....Supply Siders, on the other hand, are more than happy to realize the benefits of keynesian policy, while passing the tab on to the next administration.

You would benefit from sitting down with some data and learning how much each administration increased spending - and what political price they were prepared to pay....

You won't like it. Your Articles of Faith are gonna get hammered.....
 
blackvegetable said:
He ran as one, and governed as one........where do you believe his policies diverged from The True Path?

Keynesians believe that tax cuts have a place in fiscal policy....by nature such remedies are short term.....Supply Siders, on the other hand, are more than happy to realize the benefits of keynesian policy, while passing the tab on to the next administration.

You would benefit from sitting down with some data and learning how much each administration increased spending - and what political price they were prepared to pay....

You won't like it. Your Articles of Faith are gonna get hammered.....
Click to expand...

My articles of faith? Please do share what are those?
 
blackvegetable said:
WHERE DO YOU BELIEVE SCRUB'S POLICIES DIVERGED FROM THE TRUE PATH?


fuckin' a.........what is it with you people?
Click to expand...

you people is racist.

read what you wrote. You saying my articles of faith will get hammered was not in response to Bush diverging from true path. Maybe you have mind reading abilities but most of us mere mortals don't.
 
As far as Bush and supply side go supply side states you need to cut spending to go along with tax cuts. Bush was the biggest spender since LBJ. He didn't even attempt to cut spending. Throw in TARP and it was a disaster on the spending side.
 
cawacko said:
you people is racist.

read what you wrote. You saying my articles of faith will get hammered was not in response to Bush diverging from true path. Maybe you have mind reading abilities but most of us mere mortals don't.
Click to expand...

It's a question you've been ducking for a while now, preferring instead to persist with your inane deflections...

You claim Scrub was not a "true Supply Sider"....why?
 
cawacko said:
As far as Bush and supply side go supply side states you need to cut spending to go along with tax cuts. Bush was the biggest spender since LBJ. He didn't even attempt to cut spending. Throw in TARP and it was a disaster on the spending side.
Click to expand...

So that leaves Ronald Reagan as the other Supply Side POTUS.....

What happened to spending under Reagan? (trust me......I'm prepared for the cliches forthcoming)
 
cawacko said:
As far as Bush and supply side go supply side states you need to cut spending to go along with tax cuts. Bush was the biggest spender since LBJ. He didn't even attempt to cut spending. Throw in TARP and it was a disaster on the spending side.
Click to expand...

btw,

you DO realize that TARP was little more than necessary remediation of the Wages of Supply Side Idiocy.......we were on the brink of a severe financial catastrophe.Bernanke and Paulson were probably the very best parts of the Lost Decade.
 
blackvegetable said:
btw,

you DO realize that TARP was little more than necessary remediation of the Wages of Supply Side Idiocy.......we were on the brink of a severe financial catastrophe.Bernanke and Paulson were probably the very best parts of the Lost Decade.
Click to expand...

El Oh El. You are a hack extraordinaire. Well done. For all your rheotoric of others need to read why don't you do a little yourself. You credit the Fed when they were the leading driver of the crisis? Systemic risk had been created two decades prior by the Fed and we saw it manifest itself worst in the crash.
 
cawacko said:
El Oh El. You are a hack extraordinaire. Well done. For all your rheotoric of others need to read why don't you do a little yourself. You credit the Fed when they were the leading driver of the crisis? Systemic risk had been created two decades prior by the Fed and we saw it manifest itself worst in the crash.
Click to expand...
How was The Fed "the leading driver of the crisis"?

and how does praising Bernanke and Paulson - two Scrub appointees - make me a "hack"?

This 2 decades of "systemic risk created by the Fed"........can you be more specific?
 
blackvegetable said:
How was The Fed "the leading driver of the crisis"?

and how does praising Bernanke and Paulson - two Scrub appointees - make me a "hack"?

This 2 decades of "systemic risk created by the Fed"........can you be more specific?
Click to expand...

Plenty has been written on the Fed's low interest rate policies being steroids for the housing bubble. Are you not familiar with this?

We can go back to the mid '80's when the Fed first bailed out the market. Go to Greenspan in '87 after Black Monday. Look at the Fed and the Mexican bailout. We can go to LTCM in the late '90's. These bailouts just encouraged the reckless Wall St behavior we saw leading up to the crisis.
 
blackvegetable said:
"Job killing"?

What percentage of ALL net private sector payroll growth, in the period 2/2001 to 2/2017, were realized after Feb 2009?


Looking at all 4 year terms, whose were the highest in terms of private sector employment growth?

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2017/02/public-and-private-sector-payroll-jobs.html

remember what I've told you....

When you know nothing, you'll believe anything....
Click to expand...

Obama left us 10 trillion more in debt than we were when he entered office, this argument is over.

When you know nothing but still speak it is not only telling of your intellect but even more telling that you choose to not gather all your thoughts before you speak.
that comes from blind hatred, people so angry that their stupidity will allow them to step out in front of a moving car before looking both ways
 
cawacko said:
Plenty has been written on the Fed's low interest rate policies being steroids for the housing bubble. Are you not familiar with this?

We can go back to the mid '80's when the Fed first bailed out the market. Go to Greenspan in '87 after Black Monday. Look at the Fed and the Mexican bailout. We can go to LTCM in the late '90's. These bailouts just encouraged the reckless Wall St behavior we saw leading up to the crisis.
Click to expand...
exactly,
democrats wanting to take credit for pulling us out of a recession when it was of their making to start with.
You can not win with a liberal, they have an answer for everything and a solution for nothing
 
Getin the ring said:
exactly,
democrats wanting to take credit for pulling us out of a recession when it was of
avatar_7b62a7793d6b_128.png
their making to start with.
You can not win with a liberal, they have an answer for everything and a solution for nothing
Click to expand...

the_funniest_photos_george_w_bush_photos_25.jpg

JP-INSIDE-articleLarge.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top