"Obama has made us the laughingstock of the world!"

GazzaQueen said:
Obama did not lose his legacy because he doubled the debt because he didn't double the debt because the CBO's report was optimistic and besides Hillary won the popular vote.

And we haven't even got to the Macedonians yet.
Click to expand...

Innumerate AND incoherent........Kudos, tranny.
 
blackvegetable said:
The numbers come out much faster.....and fiscal math is not all that difficult......it does, however, require a grasp of the fundamentals....

We SHOULD judge Presidents on the consequences of the discretion they enjoy to effect outcomes.

The "Obama Doubled the Debt" is nothing but Slackjaw Clickbait. You will have to look deep inside whatever passes for your mind to determine why you are so susceptible.....

But I don't shuffle and hide. so I will address your question.

Every January, the CBO issues a report offering fiscal projections. In January 2001, its report suggested that the US would enjoy a decade of cumulative surpluses in the range of 5 trillion dollars - sufficient to eliminate the Debt Held by the Public.

In January 2009, CBO was anticipating the very opposite....and that was BEFORE it fully appreciated the Wages of Supply Side Idiocy, Part Deux.


That's a 10 trillion dollar swing.......add the 5 trillion of debt accumulated during Scrub's Reign of Error, and we can attribute at least 15 trillion of the current debt to the consequences of handing the WH to a candidate who got smoked in the popular vote.

We can also look more broadly at rates of growth in spending and revenues........but, trust me on this, you REALLY don't want to go there.....
Click to expand...

Your problem is throwing in so much partisanship takes away from an attempt at an analytical analysis. Thus your argument isn't principled based but one born of attempted political convenience.

Great job by the CBO just assuming the dot com boom would last forever. Their projections don't mean sh*t.
 
cawacko said:
Your problem is throwing in so much partisanship takes away from an attempt at an analytical analysis. Thus your argument isn't principled based but one born of attempted political convenience.

Great job by the CBO just assuming the dot com boom would last forever. Their projections don't mean sh*t.
Click to expand...

I just gave you the numbers.......we've clearly shot way past your limited understanding of the subject. Scrub even BRAGGED about eliminating the surplus.....

(go ahead...challenge me to prove it)
 
The 2002 New Hampshire Senate election phone jamming scandal involved the use of a telemarketing firm hired by that state's Republican Party (NHGOP) for election tampering. The tampering involved using a call center to jam the phone lines of a get out the vote (GOTV) operation. In the end, 900 calls were made for 45*minutes of disruption to the Democratic-leaning call centers.
During that state's 2002 election for the United States Senate seat being vacated by Republican Bob Smith, the NHGOP hired GOP Marketplace, based in northern Virginia, to jam another phone bank being used by the state Democratic Party and the firefighters' union for efforts to turn out voters on behalf of then-Governor of New Hampshire Jeanne Shaheen on Election Day. John E. Sununu, the Republican nominee, won a narrow victory. In addition to criminal prosecutions, disclosures in the case have come from a civil suit filed by the state's Democratic Party against the state's Republican Party (now settled).
Four men have been convicted of, or pleaded guilty to, federal crimes and sentenced to prison for their involvement as of 2008. One conviction has been reversed by an appeals court, a decision prosecutors are appealing. James Tobin, freed on appeal, was later indicted on charges of lying to the FBI during the original investigation.



https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_New_Hampshire_Senate_election_phone_jamming_scandal
 
republicans lie and cheat


EVERY republican here knows the court cases and studies that prove they are lying cheating shit heels



I have forced them into their faces for over a decade



they are evil and traitors to our country

EVERY ONE HERE
 
blackvegetable said:
I just gave you the numbers.......we've clearly shot way past your limited understanding of the subject. Scrub even BRAGGED about eliminating the surplus.....

(go ahead...challenge me to prove it)
Click to expand...

I enjoy conversations on the debt and getting into the weeds on it. But when discussing it from a partisan hack level it's a different discussion and that's your undertaking here
 
In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud
By ERIC LIPTON and IAN URBINAAPRIL 12, 2007

WASHINGTON, April 11 — Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.
Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as of last year.
Most of those charged have been Democrats, voting records show. Many of those charged by the Justice Department appear to have mistakenly filled out registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules, a review of court records and interviews with prosecutors and defense lawyers show.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html
 
cawacko said:
I enjoy conversations on the debt and getting into the weeds on it. But when discussing it from a partisan hack level it's a different discussion and that's your undertaking here
Click to expand...



then why do you support economic ideas from the Austrian school of economics which is a fucking joke
 
cawacko said:
I enjoy conversations on the debt and getting into the weeds on it. But when discussing it from a partisan hack level it's a different discussion and that's your undertaking here
Click to expand...

No you don't....you reflexively spouted the Drudge line, and have not demonstrated an iota of understanding of the matter since.....

In the course of these alleged enjoyable conversations, did you ever come across the term "Structural Deficit"? Can you define it?

If you just had to google it, you should do everyone a favor and never broach this topic again.

Ya follah?
 
evince said:
In 5-Year Effort, Scant Evidence of Voter Fraud
By ERIC LIPTON and IAN URBINAAPRIL 12, 2007

WASHINGTON, April 11 — Five years after the Bush administration began a crackdown on voter fraud, the Justice Department has turned up virtually no evidence of any organized effort to skew federal elections, according to court records and interviews.
Although Republican activists have repeatedly said fraud is so widespread that it has corrupted the political process and, possibly, cost the party election victories, about 120 people have been charged and 86 convicted as of last year.
Most of those charged have been Democrats, voting records show. Many of those charged by the Justice Department appear to have mistakenly filled out registration forms or misunderstood eligibility rules, a review of court records and interviews with prosecutors and defense lawyers show.


http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washington/12fraud.html
Click to expand...
How much will The Imperial Don have to raise the national debt to match Obama?
 
GazzaQueen said:
Like CBO reports. You're getting there, not that you'll ever admit it.
Click to expand...

trashing math again huh nob bobber?


they hate math


they hate sceince


they hate history


they are the stupid evil


a few rubbles and they will spew any nonsense
 
blackvegetable said:
We've isolated another of your problems.....If you think CBO reports are "irrelevant" to the topic of the Federal Budget, you are indisputably an imbecile....
Click to expand...

You obsession with me only makes you fan #5 and less than the other simpletons, as we call them in our superiority.

How much will The Imperial Don have to raise the national debt to match Obama?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top