RESTORE THE VOTING RIGHTS ACT

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voting_Rights_Act_of_1965



The Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a landmark piece of federal legislation in the United States that prohibits racial discrimination in voting.[7][8] It was signed into law by President Lyndon B. Johnson during the height of the Civil Rights Movement on August 6, 1965, and Congress later amended the Act five times to expand its protections.[7] Designed to enforce the voting rights guaranteed by the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, the Act secured voting rights for racial minorities throughout the country, especially in the South. According to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Act is considered to be the most effective piece of civil rights legislation ever enacted in the country.[9]
The Act contains numerous provisions that regulate election administration. The Act's "general provisions" provide nationwide protections for voting rights. Section 2 is a general provision that prohibits every state and local government from imposing any voting law that results in discrimination against racial or language minorities. Other general provisions specifically outlaw literacy tests and similar devices that were historically used to disenfranchise racial minorities.
The Act also contains "special provisions" that apply to only certain jurisdictions. A core special provision is the Section 5 preclearance requirement, which prohibits certain jurisdictions from implementing any change affecting voting without receiving preapproval from the U.S. Attorney General or the U.S. District Court for D.C. that the change does not discriminate against protected minorities.[10] Another special provision requires jurisdictions containing significant language minority populations to provide bilingual ballots and other election materials.
Section 5 and most other special provisions apply to jurisdictions encompassed by the "coverage formula" prescribed in Section 4(b). The coverage formula was originally designed to encompass jurisdictions that engaged in egregious voting discrimination in 1965, and Congress updated the formula in 1970 and 1975. In Shelby County v. Holder (2013), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down the coverage formula as unconstitutional, reasoning that it was no longer responsive to current conditions.[11] The Court did not strike down Section 5, but without a coverage formula, Section 5 is unenforceable.[12]
 
You know some districts are shaped the way they are because the Supreme court required that minorities be kept together so they could get a representative in congress. If you do what you are asking that might all dissapear.
 
fair drawing of district to reflect the voting population of a state


the shape is not the key factor
 
some states had like 30 % black populations and had ten districts


ONLY ONE being majority black


\drawn to devalue the black voters power even though they made up a third of the state



EFFECT


not shape
 
If you don't have a photo ID you are too damned lazy. DMV's are all over the place; if you don't drive you can walk or take the bus; small town, Dmv in the next town over, no bus, have a friend drive you. And don't bother mentioning cost, in California for example a new ID cost $29, a renewal or replacement if lost is $6. Applying for a SS card is free and it comes quick, a copy of your birth certificate (in California) is $13 and arrives quick (I got mine in the mail in 5 days).

THERE ARE NO EXCUSES.


Activities Where Requiring A Photo ID Is Apparently Not Racist:


Purchasing alcohol/tobacco
Opening a bank account
Applying for food stamps/welfare/medicaid
Applying for social security/employment/unemployment
Renting/buying/mortgaging a house
Driving/renting/buying a car
Taking a flight/train/bus
Getting a hunting/fishing license
Filling a prescription
Donating blood
The list goes on


Activities Where Requiring A Photo ID Must Be Racist:

Voting





But

But

But

But

But

They are too po to afford the $6


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
 
the founders mentioned nothing like you shits claim as a reason not to let people vote


your lies fall short
 
some states had like 30 % black populations and had ten districts


ONLY ONE being majority black


\drawn to devalue the black voters power even though they made up a third of the state



EFFECT


not shape

One district in my state was drawn with an over 60% black population despite the black population of the state being 27.5%. It's been represented by a black for over 20 years since it was drawn to appease the whiners.
 
fair drawing of district to reflect the voting population of a state


the shape is not the key factor


Tell that the the those that drew the majority minority district in my state to appease the whiners. 60% black where the state has only a 27.5% black population. Strange how the shape of it is also the only one that looks like a jigsaw puzzle piece. The other districts, which are drawn by what you call fair, don't have irregular shapes.
 
Back
Top