Republican President, Republican Congress

A

archives

Verified User
and six months in not one piece of major legislation passed and signed into law, but the man responsible has got time to personally attack a TV commentator's physical appearance

Can't be explained in any other terms than poor leadership, obviously not a President
 
archives said:
and six months in not one piece of major legislation passed and signed into law, but the man responsible has got time to personally attack a TV commentator's physical appearance

Can't be explained in any other terms than poor leadership, obviously not a President
Click to expand...

Hot take. Thanks.
 
Cant get anything done with Congress but he has sent out a lot of mean tweets!
 
the right would love him if he took their house from them


they are russian brain washed idiots created by right wing fake media subsidized by Russia
 
GazzaQueen said:
His voters are thrilled with his amazing progress thus far. Sometimes you just can't stomp hard enough.
Click to expand...

I don't need to show the film of him saying "he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes" again do I?

A good number of his "voters" are never going accept anything negative regarding the President, they are his base, unfortunately for him they don't represent the vast majority of Americans, and he was elected to represent all of America
 
archives said:
I don't need to show the film of him saying "he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes" again do I?

A good number of his "voters" are never going accept anything negative regarding the President, they are his base, unfortunately for him they don't represent the vast majority of Americans, and he was elected to represent all of America
Click to expand...

another hot take, thanks legion
 
archives said:
I don't need to show the film of him saying "he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes" again do I?

A good number of his "voters" are never going accept anything negative regarding the President, they are his base, unfortunately for him they don't represent the vast majority of Americans, and he was elected to represent all of America
Click to expand...

na


putin didnt put him in power for that reason
 
archives said:
I don't need to show the film of him saying "he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and not lose votes" again do I?

A good number of his "voters" are never going accept anything negative regarding the President, they are his base, unfortunately for him they don't represent the vast majority of Americans, and he was elected to represent all of America
Click to expand...
After he said that Hillary actually enacted getting shot on 5th Ave. The Imperial Don is prescient.

You should implore your representatives to work with the POTUS, since he beat their candidate.
 
archives said:
and six months in not one piece of major legislation passed and signed into law, but the man responsible has got time to personally attack a TV commentator's physical appearance

Can't be explained in any other terms than poor leadership, obviously not a President
Click to expand...

FYI: The executive branch is the "enforcement" branch of government for laws legislated by congress regardless of party affiliation. Example: Just as the Supreme Court pointed out concerning the pre-existing laws on immigration and the historical precedent established.....The executive branch has the authority to limit, stop, or selectively engage partial immigration. It seems strange that the LIBERALS attempted to use the court system....NOT TO ALLOW ENFORCEMENT of established law...but were slapped down by the supreme court. (an example of democrat PISS POOR LEADERSHIP...or just plain stupid anger?)

As far as legislating NEW LAW.....who needs more NEW LAWS "not to enforce"? The less that is legislated the less that is dictated. The executive branch is doing a good job using the EO pen to end the unconstitutional acts of laws engaged by the last Potus who thought he was a dictator. Why legislate anything new? It would serve the people well to simply allow the current health care act (the supposed Affordable Care Act) to stand until it is demonstrated to be the failure that it is in total collapse. And then completely rescind it...forcing the democrats to either act or lose their seat at the political hog trough. Or present new legislation in the form of 2 bills....one that rescinds....sure to pass a conservative congress and one that gives out selective pork to the demwits....Once Obama Care is rescinded....they must act or demonstrate themselves to be concerned only with party affiliation instead of service to THE PEOPLE.

One must love the propaganda concerning the supposed 20 million that will lose coverage if Obama Care is rescinded. The reality: Those 20 million was made to purchase coverage they did not want nor could not afford due to government mandate...and once they had the plans that were forced upon...they could not afford to pay the deductible in order to use the mandated coverage.

Thus the true headline should read, "20 Million Citizens escape federal prison but they are now HOMELESS....as their government mandated prison has had a federal prison break and the people are looking for shelter they can afford to purchase with a deductible low enough to actually use said service."
 
Last edited:
GazzaQueen said:
After he said that Hillary actually enacted getting shot on 5th Ave. The Imperial Don is prescient.

You should implore your representatives to work with the POTUS, since he beat their candidate.
Click to expand...

My point, the President doesn't need my representatives, he has a total majority in both bodies of Congress, my representatives could stay home and it wouldn't make a difference, he can't cross the goal line even when there is no one there to tackle him
 
archives said:
My point, the President doesn't need my representatives, he has a total majority in both bodies of Congress, my representatives could stay home and it wouldn't make a difference, he can't cross the goal line even when there is no one there to tackle him
Click to expand...

Not reaching across the aisle is the reason why you can't win any elections.
 
Ralph said:
FYI: The executive branch is the "enforcement" branch of government for laws legislated by congress regardless of party affiliation. Example: Just as the Supreme Court pointed out concerning the pre-existing laws on immigration and the historical precedent established.....The executive branch has the authority to limit, stop, or selectively engage partial immigration. It seems strange that the LIBERALS attempted to use the court system....NOT TO ALLOW ENFORCEMENT of established law...but were slapped down by the supreme court.

As far as legislating NEW LAW.....who needs more NEW LAWS "not to enforce"? The less that is legislated the less that is dictated. It would serve the people well to simply allow the current health care act (the supposed Affordable Care Act) to stand until it is demonstrated to be the failure that it is. And then completely rescind it...forcing the democrat to either act or lose their seat at the political hog trough.

One must love the propaganda concerning the supposed 20 million that will lose coverage if Obama Care is rescinded. The reality: Those 20 million was made to purchase coverage they did not want nor could not afford due to government mandate...and once they had the plans that were forced upon...they could not afford to pay the deductible in order to use the mandated coverage.

Thus the true headline should read, "20 Million Citizens escape federal prison but they are now HOMELESS....as their government mandated prison has had a federal prison break and the people are looking for shelter they can afford to purchase with a deductible low enough to actually use said service."
Click to expand...


Wow, know we know where to turn to get the official Party line

Point, nothing has passed, the President totally controls Congress and he can't get any of his agend thru, did you actually think Congress made up laws on their own and then just sent them to the Executive Branch?

Secondly, new laws are often passed to negate old laws, which was supposedly the plan for the Presiden't agenda, remember, "repeal and replace Obamacare on day 1." In addition, if the ACA is in the disastrous condition that you claim it is, would be the duty of the President to address that situation, he was elected to serve Americans not play politics with a supposed threatening disaster

And if you actually think that 22 million people currently have health care insurance only because they are forced to have health care insurance your in some alternate reality
 
archives said:
Wow, know we know where to turn to get the official Party line

Point, nothing has passed, the President totally controls Congress and he can't get any of his agend thru, did you actually think Congress made up laws on their own and then just sent them to the Executive Branch?

Secondly, new laws are often passed to negate old laws, which was supposedly the plan for the Presiden't agenda, remember, "repeal and replace Obamacare on day 1." In addition, if the ACA is in the disastrous condition that you claim it is, would be the duty of the President to address that situation, he was elected to serve Americans not play politics with a supposed threatening disaster

And if you actually think that 22 million people currently have health care insurance only because they are forced to have health care insurance your in some alternate reality
Click to expand...
Those 22 million already died in the streets when Obamacare providers stopped providing.
 
GazzaQueen said:
Not reaching across the aisle is the reason why you can't win any elections.
Click to expand...

First, the President and his Congress isn't reaching across any isle, if they did they could get a health care bill thru, it would only require half dozen Democrat votes

And the Democrats, specifically Obama did, if he hadn't health care would be single payer today, instead he went with a conservative based market approach with the ACA
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top