CNN’s Russia bullsh*t starts to unravel

anatta said:
did you see the story where NSA said they didn't have access to Susan Rice's unmasking requests?
They said it was forwareded to the "Obama Library" ( which isn't scheduled forcompletion for 5 more years)

Former National Security Adviser Susan Rice Says She’s a Victim of Racism and Sexism
https://heatst.com/politics/former-...rice-says-shes-a-victim-of-racism-and-sexism/
She’s especially bitter that organizations like Judicial Watch continue to look into Rice’s efforts to “unmask” certain Trump transition officials named in foreign surveillance records. JW says the move is evidence that the Obama team “weaponized” information against the incoming administration.

She says the investigation is tantamount to a witch hunt. Judicial Watch says that Rice and her colleagues were so desperate to hide evidence that she may have violated rules protecting classified information. It says that they quickly shifted all documents related to the case to Obama’s Presidential Library, effectively sealing them for at least five years.
Click to expand...

Yeah, I saw that. I hope people are paying attention.
 
GazzaQueen said:
The free press didn't fire them for printing a lie. It fired them for getting caught in a lie. There was no Russian investment fund with ties to Trump officials.
Click to expand...

That's a lie. CNN forced resignations over reporting that failed to meet its standards for sourcing. There is nothing in the story that was proven wrong. BTW, the person whom the story was about described what CNN did as "classy." You? You and your herd bowed your heads as your masters poured gasoline on your hair (or nice wig from Crossdressers R US) and then gave you each a match.
 
free press correcting its self



so they RUSH to the Russian times for their talking points about it
 
anatta said:
you need to find a board where your hyperbole is accepted as having worth.
That doesn't fly around here - bloviation is meaningless-ad homs are worthless.
Click to expand...

Damn, you may have just broken your own record for oblivious twittery, already. Having regurgitated a long-winded opinion from Russia Today to defend Putin's bitch, you now do an empty whimper about bloviation by someone else. And, you created an imaginary posse for backup.
 
RickyTavy said:
Damn, you may have just broken your own record for oblivious twittery, already. Having regurgitated a long-winded opinion from Russia Today to defend Putin's bitch, you now do an empty whimper about bloviation by someone else. And, you created an imaginary posse for backup.
Click to expand...
impeaching a source isn't refutation of a story.
I used RT because they hit CNN hard, whereas the weasel press here has a tendency
to excuse other purveyors of fake news.

Like the rest of your posse here -to steal your phrase- there is much wailing about RT as the source,
but silence on it's content. RT nailed CNN's modus operandi
 
anatta said:
impeaching a source isn't refutation of a story.
I used RT because they hit CNN hard, whereas the weasel press here has a tendency
to excuse other purveyors of fake news.

Like the rest of your posse here -to steal your phrase- there is much wailing about RT as the source,
but silence on it's content. RT nailed CNN's modus operandi
Click to expand...

First, unless you are one of the poorly educated whom trump loves so dearly, impeaching a source certainly does refute a story. Learning to determine such is one of the fundamentals of a liberal arts education (moron is gonna hit the "liberal" in "liberal arts" now). Second, you did not regurgitate a story, you regurgitated an opinion. That Russia Today is among those who exploit your tiny mind reveals more than you know, apparently, about what a feeble-minded twit you are. Third, you regurgitated this opinion, because you believed it validated your prejudices. Fourth, a long-winded rant about fake news from a notoriously fake news entity does not contain content. It is a test of rightard gullibility. In catapulting it, you passed. You are a good rightard.
 
RickyTavy said:
First, unless you are one of the poorly educated whom trump loves so dearly, impeaching a source certainly does refute a story. Learning to determine such is one of the fundamentals of a liberal arts education (moron is gonna hit the "liberal" in "liberal arts" now). Second, you did not regurgitate a story, you regurgitated an opinion. That Russia Today is among those who exploit your tiny mind reveals more than you know, apparently, about what a feeble-minded twit you are. Third, you regurgitated this opinion, because you believed it validated your prejudices. Fourth, a long-winded rant about fake news from a notoriously fake news entity does not contain content. It is a test of rightard gullibility. In catapulting it, you passed. You are a good rightard.
Click to expand...
I should have said "attempts to impeach a source" -correct.

However the OP is a handy list of CNN's sloppiness/innuendo/ and fake "experts" who's primary
expertise is being able to regurgitate *Russia grr grr*

That's enough to engage your mind,
and the rating show there are no shortage of similar minds who are willingly hypnotized-
but it's not anything serious in terms of analysis/refutation.

They are a dog and pony show for the 'resistance' -where simply feeling Trump is a Putin stooge ( etc.)
is enough to keep them engaged.

Once again you are invited to dissuade us of the facts/opinions in the OP..
if not * Russia grr grr* as your analysis is duly noted as your agreement with CNN.
 
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/nea...cid=spartandhp




Nearly 200M Americans hit by massive voter records leak




Personal information for more than 198 million American voters were left exposed this month after a data analytics firm hired by the Republican National Committee stored the files on an unsecured Amazon server.

Deep Root Analytics, the conservative analytics firm, confirmed in a statement Monday the files had been accessed without their knowledge.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top