STUNNING charge from Wasserman Schultz - Obama admin allowed the DNC hacking

Sorry. Not last years news. The "hack" into the DNC servers are at the heart of all of the Russian collusion allegations. Sorry. We warned you that pushing this ginned up story would have unintended consequences for you lefties. Now the chickens have come home to roost.
they are at the heart of the "Russian interference" investigation -which is the basis for the (non-existent) collusion investigation
 
You really are uninformed, or, as your fat boy puts it, "low information," it was your Donald that claimed the Obama did nothing about the hacking;

"Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?
8:43 PM - 23 Jun 2017" - Trump

And did you notice by doing such he is acknowledging Russian interference, try to keep up

Excuse me scarecrow; but the bolded is a FACT. And if you had watched the Wassermann interview, she not only confirms it, but then impugns the Obama Administration for it's incompetence and lies. Were you born this stupid; or do you work at it? That was rhetorical. :rofl2:
 
Was anything in those WikiLeaks false??

You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017
 
You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017

UHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, no I didn't; but I'm positive you're praying that it was so.

I love how willingly you are to "forget" the past, when it comes to the DNC and their own party members.
 
You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017

Of course you don't care about FACTS; you only care about false narratives and the lies spread by the Party of the Jackass in an effort to destroy our election processes. Dunce.

Julian Assange unequivocally states that the information they received was NOT from the Russian Government scarecrow. Got brains? :rofl2:
 
Excuse me scarecrow; but the bolded is a FACT. And if you had watched the Wassermann interview, she not only confirms it, but then impugns the Obama Administration for it's incompetence and lies. Were you born this stupid; or do you work at it? That was rhetorical. :rofl2:

Ah, that is not true either, he did act, threw out Russian officials in US, added sanctions, confronted Putin directly, and put into place a plan to jeopardize Russian infrastructure via computer access, as I said, you really aren't up to date

Also, again if you knew what you were talking about, the WikiLeaks information had been obtained prior to the President confronted Putin

Could he have done more, of course. but then he would have had all you conspiracy nuts claiming he was throwing the election, Rush could have bought himself another Florida home off the money he could have made demonizing that one

You really got to read if you want to post intelligent information
 
Trump loving wikileaks exposure of DNC corruption is not a crime scarecrow; I do wish you had a brain....but then, you wouldn't be a willful shill for the Party of the Jackass. :rofl2:

Getting funnier, having trouble processing information, and, let me help you out, emojis are corny, unless your a junior high girl gossiping with her friends
 
You realize in that last post you just confirmed that the Russians did interfere and they interfered in favor of Trump?

I don't care about WikiLeaks, nor last year's election, just like I don't care about the election of 2012 or any other in the past, they are history, not our fault you have a Clinton phobia and are stuck with a failing Presidency, get over it, it is 2017

My bad, that was suppose to got under the other guy who said that the WikiLeaks was the center of the investigations
 
Of course you don't care about FACTS; you only care about false narratives and the lies spread by the Party of the Jackass in an effort to destroy our election processes. Dunce.

Julian Assange unequivocally states that the information they received was NOT from the Russian Government scarecrow. Got brains? :rofl2:

I "don't care about the facts" and then he goes on to use Julian Assange as a source, beautiful

I really hope you don't OD on that Kool Aid

 
Then show one definitive FACT that supports the accusation.

Just one; because all that's been presented is a big ole "LOOKY THERE".
Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


This is just starting to get good.


Stay tuned.
 
Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


This is just starting to get good.


Stay tuned.

So you have NOTHING; but you are praying for ANYTHING.
I understand.
 
Who cares, last years news, I realize it ain't easy defending the President
For those that defend him, no it isn't. He's uncouth, obnoxious, immature, has really bad orange hair and the orange spray tan doesn't work.
nor his policies, if you can figure out exactly what his policies are,
Now that's easy:
Gorsuch.......Keystone pipeline.....removal of restrictions on domestic oil production.....reduced immigration......increased consumer confidence.......I will catch my breath while you contemplate those......
I was thinking the same. Paring down the overreach of the EPA, charter schools, no subsidies to failing green energy companies which end up going BK anyway (solyndra)....
And they're very easy to defend. And that's just a short list
but you got to get over your obsession with Hillary, it's 2017, last year's talk radio scapegoats aren't relevant, nobody cares
As long as she ShutsTFU I will ignore her. As soon as she does more stupid shit like her excuse tour or Wonder Woman comparison, I won't.

What I find amazing is that the exposed Podesta and DNC emails exposing their corruption don't even faze the snowflakes. Rather than try and correct it or do some badly needed introspection they hunker down with more nebulous and tertiary charges against Trump. Witness intimidation from tweets? Really? And you're going to investigate that?
What's your message, snowflakes, beside repealing the 1st and 2nd amendments? Because that's all I see and you're not going far with that.
 
Last edited:
Patience, Grasshopper. trump has been obstructing any investigations. Nunes was the first step....followed by numerous others. When trump's financials come out, we'll understand exactly why he colluded with Russia. They have him over a barrel. How do you explain his allowing Russian operatives into the White House in order to give them classified information? He made sure the U.S press wasn't around.


This is just starting to get good.


Stay tuned.
"Russian operatives" sounds so ominous. It was a Russian photog and Serge Lavrov their Foreign Affairs Minister
( equivalent to our Sec of State) -and it wasn't any secret.

He gave them info on the fact of laptops becoming more used for airplane attacks.
we are still partnered on terrorism despite the Russiaphobia

Keep waiting on that collusion :rolleyes: ..it's gonna be long after we're dead.
 
"Russian operatives" sounds so ominous. It was a Russian photog and Serge Lavrov their Foreign Affairs Minister
( equivalent to our Sec of State) -and it wasn't any secret.

He gave them info on the fact of laptops becoming more used for airplane attacks.
we are still partnered on terrorism despite the Russiaphobia

Keep waiting on that collusion :rolleyes: ..it's gonna be long after we're dead.

It's because he's Trump.

JAMES TRUMP

and he likes them shaken, not stirred.
 
You really are uninformed, or, as your fat boy puts it, "low information," it was your Donald that claimed the Obama did nothing about the hacking;

"Just out: The Obama Administration knew far in advance of November 8th about election meddling by Russia. Did nothing about it. WHY?
8:43 PM - 23 Jun 2017" - Trump

And did you notice by doing such he is acknowledging Russian interference, try to keep up

Of course there was Russian interference...and was...and is...all over the world. Heck, even Obama "interfered" with the Israeli election. This is not news. But, there was no Russian "collusion" with Trump. How many times does this have to be repeated month after month.
 
Trey Gowdy Finds Out DNC Server Was Never Turned Over To Law Enforcement & He's Pissed

About time someone was pissed over it.

It's amazing, that this Russia thing was allowed to go on for so long when the single most important piece of evidence hasn't been looked at by the FBI.

That just blows me away. No wonder Trump doesn't go on about the 'Russian hacking'. I wouldn't either.
 
Back
Top