that doesn't make them right.....
perhaps.....but you're the first person I've ever heard use it......what does it mean?......I'm not the one who created those terms
perhaps.....but you're the first person I've ever heard use it......what does it mean?......
But you are using the law to avoid making a comment on the action of the officer.
You're obviously free to believe or say whatever you want. But you are using the law to avoid making a comment on the action of the officer.
As an anology, if a woman had an abortion she would be within her rights legally. But you generally speak out against abortion even though it's legal.
I and many others, believe what this cop did was murder.
Perhaps? It is used all the time talking about universities admissions, workplace employment etc.
You don't know. You haven't heard all the facts, as did the jury.
that's because I don't have all the information on the action of the officer........the jury did, unless your argument is simply that the prosecuting attorney failed to present information to the jury.......it seems though that your argument is that the jury was wrong.......under the US legal system, juries cannot be wrong.....at least not unless a judge determines a mistrial, which I don't believe is a possibility here........
tried googling it.....did you perhaps mean an UNDERSERVED community instead of an UNDESERVED community?.......
We know the pertinent facts.
The cop lied and said that he saw a gun. it's on the video
We know the gun in question was in the victim's pocket and was never drawn
We know he reached for his wallet to get his ID as he was instructed to do by officer fraidy pants
We know the cop acted unreasonably and made conflicting statements
We know the cop was not threatened by the victim in any way
This was just another botched prosecution... By design
As stated before, the issue is the law not the jury.
When they talk about tech companies, for example, they don't say they have a lack of minorities because Asian and Indian workers are way over represented. They say instead under serves communities I.e. black and Hispanic are not fairly represented in the workforce. Same for black and Hispanic students in universities
ironically no......in the legal system we refer to issues of law and issues of fact........issues of fact are the realm of the jury and issues of law are the realm of the judge.......what we are discussing here is an issue of fact and ONLY the jury may decide that.......
so you acknowledge there is no such thing as an undeserved community.........
So judges write the law now? When did this officially start? How does it work, do we lonby our elected officials to get judges to change laws?
are you so dense you won't even acknowledge you spelled it wrong?......I only questioned it because there is no such thing as "undeserved" community........you've even acknowledged in your reply that you were talking about underserved......stop being a dickhead......Jesus Christ dude