Sessions can't remember his name

Sailor said:
If they actually took a portion of Democrats politicians pay to help pay for these hearings, they would stop today. In all fairness the same would go for the GOP when the other party is in.
Click to expand...
Or they could just take away all Republican pay for each day they investigated Benghazi.
 
Darth Omar said:
For all the reasons to attack Sessions, it's just amazing that Dems have chosen to focus on perfunctory interactions with Russian officials. [Young Turk Michael Tracey via Twitter]

Even some notable progressives are getting tired of Russia, Russia, Russia.

Imagine how the independents are feeling about it.
Click to expand...
Except for the fact that our country was attacked by Russia, and nobody in the entire trump team asked the FBI about it. Ever.
 
Althea said:
Public hearings are for nothing but t.v ratings. What the Dem. questions will do, is prove incompetence by virtually everyone in trump's cabinet.

The one glaring question that keeps coming up, is the fact that nobody in trump's entire 'team' ever inquired of the FBI the issue of Russia attacking our election systems.

That speaks volumes, and will be in every mid term ad.
Click to expand...

Meh, Russians having been 'hacking' elections for years. That hardly ever comes up.

And I'm not convinced they did anything out of the ordinary in the past election. Putin made Megyn Kelly look silly in her big interview by pointing out the obvious: Putin said a three year old can cover their cyber tracks and/or plant a false flag by making it appear Russia [or anyone else, for that matter] was behind it. Kelly had no answer for it because nobody does.

Couple that with Assange's claim that Russians weren't behind the leaks and the fact nobody in the IC has seen first hand evidence that implicates Russia [they need the DNC server for that] the case against Russia is paper thin.

In fact, any self respecting and halfway competent judge would throw the case out of court if it were a criminal trial.

You got sucked in on it.
 
Darth Omar said:
Meh, Russians having been 'hacking' elections for years. That hardly ever comes up.

And I'm not convinced they did anything out of the ordinary in the past election. Putin made Megyn Kelly look silly in her big interview by pointing out the obvious: Putin said a three year old can cover their cyber tracks and/or plant a false flag by making it appear Russia [or anyone else, for that matter] was behind it. Kelly had no answer for it because nobody does.

Couple that with Assange's claim that Russians weren't behind the leaks and the fact nobody in the IC has seen first hand evidence that implicates Russia [they need the DNC server for that] the case against Russia is paper thin.

In fact, any self respecting and halfway competent judge would throw the case out of court if it were a criminal trial.

You got sucked in on it.
Click to expand...
I think it is fascinating that you, like Trump, believe Putin instead of our 17 agencies.
 
Althea said:
Except for the fact that our country was attacked by Russia, and nobody in the entire trump team asked the FBI about it. Ever.
Click to expand...
it's assumed the CIA uses counter-measures. Recall a whole lot of cyber malware was hacked.
So do the CIA use this stuff or do they just accumulate it?

Besides we've already sanctioned Russia over and over for what good it does.
Maybe we should push back with some cyber-wars of our own.
And then it won't be so hysterical when they do the same
 
Darth Omar said:
Meh, Russians having been 'hacking' elections for years. That hardly ever comes up.

And I'm not convinced they did anything out of the ordinary in the past election. Putin made Megyn Kelly look silly in her big interview by pointing out the obvious: Putin said a three year old can cover their cyber tracks and/or plant a false flag by making it appear Russia [or anyone else, for that matter] was behind it. Kelly had no answer for it because nobody does.

Couple that with Assange's claim that Russians weren't behind the leaks and the fact nobody in the IC has seen first hand evidence that implicates Russia [they need the DNC server for that] the case against Russia is paper thin.

In fact, any self respecting and halfway competent judge would throw the case out of court if it were a criminal trial.

You got sucked in on it.
Click to expand...
Only the NSA has first hand knowledge ( not "17 intel agencies")
and the FBI didn't even investigate the DNC server because the Clinton's wouldn't let them
 
Althea said:
Except for the fact that our country was attacked by Russia, and nobody in the entire trump team asked the FBI about it. Ever.
Click to expand...

Of course Russia picked the stupid clown to be our Potus. Why would they want the smart one woman who gets it?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top