The sad spectacle of Hillary Clinton’s slow-motion breakdown

Amadeus said:
I will post where I like, and you will either like it or you won't. This thread is a sad symptom of how Republicans, Trump supporters and Putin sympathizers are eager to hold Clinton to a standard that Trump himself miserably fails to meet. Meanwhile, Trump is president and Hillary isn't. If you spent half as much time holding Trump accountable, maybe he'd get something done. Instead you give Trump free reign to do nothing but act the buffoon.
Click to expand...

Hillary keeps herself in the news. Did you hear about the Macedonian involvement in the US elections?
 
anatta said:
Hillary Clinton's Mostly False claim on photo ID, voter suppression in Wisconsin in 2016 election
http://www.politifact.com/wisconsin...y-clintons-mostly-false-claim-photo-id-voter/
The best estimate is that 200,000 people in Wisconsin were either denied or chilled in their efforts to vote," she said. "I don’t think we believed at the time, before the election, that it would be anything like that, anything as big as that."

Clinton’s claim is similar to one by U.S. Sen. Tammy Baldwin, D-Wis., that we rated Mostly False.

(The Washington Post Fact Checker later gave Baldwin three Pinocchios for the claim.)
Click to expand...

Hillary has completely lost it. She lives in bubble completely devoid of reality and lives stuck in a time warp. I think she truly believes that all her lies and shady dealings throughout her miserable life are actually virtuous. This and the Newsday article you posted are spot-on. :cool:
 
Hillary-Clinton-Wearing-a-Barcode-Gag-39984-1.jpg
 
Amadeus said:
Perhaps since Hillary isn't the leader of the Democrats, isn't president, and never will be president, maybe there should be some focus on politically relevant figures like President Trump. Maybe. I know it's hard to hold your own leaders accountable, but at least put forth some effort.
Click to expand...

Says one of many still kissing Obama's ass.
 
What's the count up to for those she's blaming for losing the election? 22 was the last number I saw. Not surprisingly, she didn't blame herself.
 
Just let her back into the woods. Give her a fur coat, .....around hunting season.......preferably around dusk or dawn.....
 
Stretch said:
She's probably pacing the floor as we speak and screeching at Bubba to help her come up with more reasons.
Click to expand...

It's funny that the press still holds her in such awe they can't say, "Yeah, but Hillary....the Macedonians?"

They just let that slide by like it was never said and can never be repeated.
 
anatta said:
image.jpeg

Hillary Clinton delivers her keynote address during the Medgar Evers CollegeÕs 46th commencement ceremony at the Barclays Center in Brooklyn Thursday, June 8, 2017
http://www.newsday.com/opinion/comm...ry-clinton-s-slow-motion-breakdown-1.13725240

Hillary Clinton seems to have launched yet another political campaign, one to convince Americans they absolutely did the right thing by not electing her president.

But Clinton’s ongoing public struggle with herself is alienating even supporters and it’s crippling the required remodeling and rejuvenation of her aged Democratic Party, which needs a long rehab at some political spa.

The only thing Democrats have going for them right now is an undisciplined president and Republican disunity.

There’s no end in sight for her such self-imposed scab-picking; Clinton has not one but two books coming out this fall that will put her on stage after stage across the country with obsequious hosts feeding the Clinton ego with continuous curiosity about her thoughts and doings. Oh, and how in the world could Donald Trump have won?

At some point you’d think a remorseless Clinton might run out of people, countries and conspiracies to blame for that historic upset in November. It was truly a devastating loss, perhaps the most shocking since Tom Dewey’s unanticipated flop in 1948. It’s understandable, if ominous, that the wannabe commander-in-chief was shattered and unable to appear election night.

In fact, that’s one of the reasons Clinton cites for losing. Not Dewey, but the expectation that the immense campaign she’d planned for so many years would indeed succeed. She lost, she explains, as “the victim of a very broad assumption that I was going to win.” Say what? :whoa:

She lost because “for whatever reason” FBI Director James Comey reopened the investigation into her email scandal just before the election. She lost because of the Russians. You know, the people she helped gain control of 20 percent of U.S. uranium, the folks who paid her husband a small fortune for one speech.

She lost because of American misogyny. She lost because of big money, even though hers was by far the biggest money. And she got pretty big bucks for her closed Wall Street speeches.

She lost because of the media. She lost because Americans do not like giving a third straight White House term to the same party, even though they did in 1988 and - oh, look - in 1948, the fifth straight Democratic term in the White House.

And she lost because the Democratic National Committee, the happily hackable crowd that was quietly subverting the primary campaign of her party competitor Sen. Bernie Sanders, was useless and bankrupt.

She actually lost because of a quarter-century of political baggage and scandals. But she doesn’t say that because it’s the truth. She lost because even after all this ambition-fueled plotting, no one on her staff would hand her a rationale for why she should be president. But she doesn’t say that because, shouldn’t the candidate herself have an inkling about that?

She lost because of that darned Comey investigation. But wait! He’d have nothing to investigate if she herself hadn’t ignored official warnings and constructed an illicit, unsecured private email server to dodge public transparency during her government service. There, Clinton and aides were wheeling and dealing favors for Clinton Foundation donors and sharing national security secrets like teen girls texting prom gossip.

The 69-year-old lost because despite years of practice, she was just a terrible, maladroit campaigner who could not stop coughing and collapsed on national TV.

American voters don’t always pay attention to politics. There’s so much other news of little consequence to consume. But when they do, they can smell insincerity through a TV screen. :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

She lost...
get over it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top